38
VII. How the World Bank Group Operates
continued
The Wo ld Ba k G oup’s Wo k i Afghanistan: Year Comparison
10
Year comparison:
This year’s respondents had significantly lower levels of agreement with the statement that “Overall the WBG currently plays a relevant role in development
in Afghanistan ” than respondents in the FY’12 Country Survey.
10
All means presented in this chart are calculated based on weighted data. This is why the means in FY’15 in this chart are slightly different from those in the previous page. For more information about weighting, please see
Appendix F.
7.2
6.5
6.3 7.8
6.6
6.4 7.0
6.5
6.2
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Overall the World Bank Group currently plays a relevant role in development in Afghanistan¹
The Wo ld Ba k G oup’s o k is alig ed ith what I consider the development priorities for
Afghanistan¹
The World Bank Group supports programs and strategies that are realistic for Afghanistan
Mean Level of Agreement
FY 2015 FY 2012
FY 2008 To hat e te t do ou ag ee ith the follo i g state e ts a out the Wo ld Ba k G oup’s
work in Afghanistan? 1-Strongly disagree, 10-Strongly agree Significantly different between FY2015 and FY2012 ¹Indicator Question
Note: Means in this chart are calculated based on weighted data
39
VII. How the World Bank Group Operates
continued
The Wo ld Ba k G oup’s Wo k i Afghanistan: Collaboration
Collaboration: Respondents currently collaborating with the WBG had significantly
lower levels of agreement with the statement that “the WBG supports programs and
strategies that are realistic for Afghanistan ” than respondents who previously
collaborated with the institution. Regarding the other two statements, respondents across levels of collaboration had statistically similar levels of agreement.
7.4
6.8
5.7 7.9
6.9
7.3 7.0
6.5
5.8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
Overall the World Bank Group currently plays a relevant role in development in Afghanistan¹
The Wo ld Ba k G oup’s o k is alig ed ith what I consider the development priorities for
Afghanistan¹
The World Bank Group supports programs and st ategies that a e ealisti fo Afgha ista ⁱ
Mean Level of Agreement
Currently collaborating
Previously collaborated
Never collaborated
To hat e te t do ou ag ee ith the follo i g state e ts a out the Wo ld Ba k G oup’s work in Afghanistan? 1-Strongly disagree, 10-Strongly agree
ⁱ“ignifi antly different a ross le els of olla oration ¹Indicator Question
40
VII. How the World Bank Group Operates
continued
Overall Perceptions
Stakeholder groups: There were significant
differences in respondents’ levels of agreement with four statements about the WBG listed below. In most cases,
respondents from the Office of PresidentCEOMinister had significantly higher levels of agreement than respondents from other stakeholder groups:
The WBG treats clients and stakeholders in Afghanistan with respect The WBG effectively monitors and evaluates the projects and programs it
supports The WBG disburses funds promptly
The WBG provides effective implementation support
Geographic locations: Respondents located in Kabul were significantly more likely to
agree that “the WBG’s ‘Safeguard Policy’ requirements are reasonable” compared to respondents located outside Kabul.
7.7 7.2
