8.9 8.5 7.7 7.4 7.0 5.7 7.2 7.1 7.0 6.6 6.5 6.4 5.7 5.3 5.0 Background Information: Respondents were asked to indicate their current position,

29 VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness Importance of Sectoral Areas

9.2 8.9

8.8 8.8

8.7 8.5

8.3 8.2

8.0 8.0

8.0 7.9

7.8 7.7

7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5

7.5 7.4

7.3 7.3 7.2 7.2

7.2 7.0

6.9 6.9 6.8 6.8 6.7 6.7

5.9 5.7

5.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Education Agricultural development Energy Economic growth Poverty reduction Securitystabilizationreconstruction Job creationemployment Health Rural development Trade and exports Natural resource management Transport Private sector development Water and sanitation Foreign direct investment Public sector governance reform Urban development Financial markets Information and communications technology Disaster management Regional integration and cooperation Food security Equality of opportunity Anti corruption Local governance and institutions Social protection Law and justice Environmental sustainability Communicablenon-communicable diseases Social cohesion Gender equity Climate change Regional conflict and tensions Regulatory framework Crime and violence Mean Importance Rating In your opinion, how IMPORTANT is it for the World Bank Group to be involved in the following areas of development in Afghanistan? 1-Not important at all, 10-Very important 30 VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness continued Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas 7.7 7.7

7.5 7.2

7.2 7.1

7.1 7.0

6.9 6.9 6.8 6.8

6.7 6.6

6.6 6.5

6.5 6.5

6.5 6.4

6.3 6.3

6.2 6.1

6.1 6.1

6.0 5.8

5.8 5.7

5.7 5.3

5.1 5.0

4.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rural development Education Agricultural development Economic growth Health Information and communications technology Transport Poverty reduction Urban development Private sector development Securitystabilizationreconstruction Job creationemployment Food security Water and sanitation Foreign direct investment Trade and exports Communicablenon-communicable diseases Gender equity Local governance and institutions Energy Natural resource management Environmental sustainability Disaster management Regional integration and cooperation Social protection Public sector governance reform Financial markets Law and justice Social cohesion Climate change Equality of opportunity Regulatory framework Regional conflict and tensions Anti corruption Crime and violence Mean Effectiveness Rating How EFFECTIVE do you believe the World Bank Group is in terms of the work it does in the following areas of development in Afghanistan? 1-Not effective at all, 10-Very effective 31 VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness continued Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas continued  Stakeholder groups: There were significant stakeholder differences in respondents’ ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness in nine of the thirty five sectoral areas. In most cases, respondents from the Office of PresidentCEOMinister gave the highest ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness, whereas respondents from the media tended to give significantly lower ratings. There sectoral areas include:  Transport;  Urban development;  Regulatory framework;  Poverty reduction;  Local governance and institutions;  Disaster management;  Regional integration and cooperation;  Social protection; and  Climate change.  Geographic locations: There were no significant geographic differences in respondents’ ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness any of the thirty five sectoral areas.  Areas of specialization: It is worth pointing out that respondents who specialize in “education” 16 of the sample gave significantly lower ratings for the WBG’s effectiveness in six of the thirty five sectoral areas listed below than respondents specializing in other areas.  Information and communications technology;  Regulatory framework;  Communicablenon-communicable diseases;  Rural development;  Regional integration and cooperation; and  Climate change.  Note in the Appendix on the sectoral effectiveness Appendix A, page 78 that primarily informed stakeholders responded to this question. Respondents were given the option of “don’t know” if they did not have exposure to the WBG’s work in certain development areas. 32 VI. Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness continued Effectiveness of Sectoral Areas: Year Comparison 9 9 Only those sectoral areas that were asked in the FY’08, FY’12 and FY’15 Country Surveys are explored in this chart. All means presented in this chart are calculated based on weighted data. See Appendix F for details. 7.7 7.7

7.6 7.4