Validity test of the assessment items

Seyyed Ali Moussavi-Najarkola AJE Vol.9 2009 76 The CEI method is a new model for assessing exposure to various risk factors that can cause UEMSDs in repetitive tasks. The method utilizes concepts from the OCRA method 10, the SI method 12, CEN 15, Kilbom 16 and ECSC 21,22,23. A CEI score of 2 must be achieved to prevent the incidence of UEMSDs. CEI can be used for classifying safe and hazardous tasks, and for proposing design solutions to correct awkward workplace situations. The model requires reliability and validation, particularly by means of a parallel and continuous study of induced UEMSDs in groups of exposed workers. CEI considers various risk factors. Parallel investigations are required to find more reasonable relationships between clinical effects and calculated index scores. Based on results obtained from tests, the model is found to be sensitive for assessing the interventions and changes in exposure and assessment items before and after ergonomic intervention. The model is also reliable, valid and applicable for a vast range of tasks and jobs. Assessment reliability, validity and exposure index applicability may improve if assessors’ training is improved. In test results the CEI model achieved “acceptable” inter-observer, intra-observer and validity agreement. References Nordin M, Andersson G 1997. Musculoskeletal Disorders in the workplace: Principles and practice . Mosby–year Book Inc. Buckle P, Devereux J 2002. The nature of work–related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Applied ergonomics, 333:207-17. Bernard BP 1997. Musculoskeletal disorders workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiological evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back pain . 1 st ed. Department of Health and Human Services DHHS NIOSH Press, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, pp.: 183-97. Putz-Anderson V1994. Cumulative trauma,a manual for musculoskeletal disprders of the upper limb . Taylor Francis Publishing. London. UK. Hagberg M, Silverstein B,Wells R, et al. 1995. Identification, measurement and evaluation of risk . In: work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders. A Reference Book for Prevention . Eds, I Kuorinka and L Foreier. Taylor Francis Publishing. 1 st Ed. London and Philadelphia. UK. Drury CG 1987. A biomechanical evaluation of the repetitive motion injury potential of industrial jobs, Seminars on Occupational Medicine. 2: 41-49. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ 1986. Hand-wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 43: 779-784. Tanaka J, Mcglothin JD 1993. A conceptual quantitative model for prevention of work-related carpal tunnel syndrome. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 11: 181-193 . Dempsey P G 1993.A critical review of biomechanical, epidemiological, physiological and psychological criteria for designing manual materials handling tasks. Ergonomics, 41: 73-88. Occhipinti E 1998. OCRA: a concise index for the assessment of exposure to repetitive movements of the upper limbs. Ergonomics, 41: 1290-1311. Chronic Exposure Index Model to Assess Ergonomic Risk Factor Related to Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders 77 Keyserling WM, Stetson DS, Silverstein B, et al.1993.A check list for evaluating ergonomic risk factor associated with upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders. Ergonomics, 36: 807-831. Moore JS, Garg A 1995. The strain index: a proposed method to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal , 56: 443-458. Li G, Buckle P 1999. Evaluating change in exposure to risk for musculoskeletal disorders- a practical tool . HSE Books CRR 2511999. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, et al. 1993. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36: 749-776. CEN 1993. Safety of machinery. Human physical performance. Part 3: Recommended force limits for machinery operation . Draft PR EN 1005-3,CEN. Kilbom A 1994a. Repetitive work of the upper extremities. Part 1:Guidelines for the practitioner.Part 2:The scientific basic knowledge base for the guide. International journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 14:51-86. Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, et al. 1993. A conceptual Model For Work-Related Neck And Upper–Limb Musculoskeletal Disorders, Scandinavian Journal Of Work, Environment And Health , 19:73-84. Karwowski W, Marras WS 1999. The occupational Ergonomics Handbook. CRC Press LCC. 1 st Ed. HSE 1998. Manual handling: Guide on regulations.2 nd Ed. HSE Books. London, UK. Worksafe WA 2000. Code of practice: Manual handling. Worksafe Western Australia. 1 st Ed.Queensland, Australia. Mital A, Nicholson AS, Ayoub MM 1997. A guide to Manual Material Handling. Taylor Francis Ltd. 2 nd Ed. pp. 13. EC Council Directive L156,160, C77 1994. Official Journal of the European Communities . pp. 9-13, 39. Aresini GA 2000. Regulatory issues in occupational ergonomics. In: Occupational ergonomics: work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb and neck . Eds, F Violante, T Armstrong, A Kilbom. Taylor Francis Publishing. 1 st Ed. London New York. UK US. pp.210-216. Van der Beek AJ, Frings-Dresen MHW 1998. Assessment of mechanical exposure in ergonomic epidemiology. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55: 291-99. Stok SH 1991. Workplace ergonomic factors and the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limbs: a meta- analysis. Am J Ind Med, 19:87- 107 . Hoogendoorn WE, Van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, et al. 2000. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine. 25 : 2114-2125. Bongers P, Kremer AM, Ter laak J 2002. Are psychosocial factors , risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder , elbow or handwrist?: a review of the epidemiological literature. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41: 315-342. Simoneau S, St.-Vincent M, Chicoine D 2003. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders WMSD s : a better understanding for more effective prevention . Technical guide RG126-ang. IRSST.Que َ bec. Winkel J, Mathiassen SE 1994. Assessment of physical workload in epidemiologic

Dokumen yang terkait

Aplikasi Integrasi Metode Fuzzy Servqual dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus: SMP Swasta Cinta Rakyat 3 Pematangsiantar)

10 125 85

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

9 100 164

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : Di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

18 109 164

Penerapan Metode Kano, Quality Function Deployment Dan Value Engineering Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Produk Sarung Tangan Karet

11 73 101

Aplikasi Kansei Engineering Dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Serta Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch (TRIZ) Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Pada Instalasi Hemodialisis

9 92 70

Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Menggunakan Metode Quality Function Deployment (Qfd); (Studi Kasus Japanese Mathematics Center Sakamoto Method Cabang Multatuli Medan)

8 152 80

Integrasi Aplikasi Metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD) dengan Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Hotel, Studi Kasus: Hotel Grand Angkasa Internasional Medan

15 91 169

Redesign Of Perforator Through Integration Of Ergonomics Approach And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 4 24

Redesign Of A Cradle For Aircraft Maintenance Using Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24

Redesign Of A Hand Pallet Truck For Manufacturing Industry Using Integration Of Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24