Interaction of individual comfort and discomfort on comfort and discomfort perception

Laboratory Study of Factors Affecting Sitting Comfort and Discomfort 91

3.7 Interactions of discomfort factors with relax in comfort perception

An almost extreme level of mean comfort 6.5 was perceived by the subjects in the presence of extreme levels of relaxation while sitting. Extremes levels of mean comfort were associated with extreme levels of relaxation and lower levels of discomfort factors. Generally, relaxation levels 5 and 6 in association with discomfort factor level 5 produced below-moderate levels of mean comfort Table 9. Relaxation level 7 in association with discomfort factor level 6 produced mean comfort of 3.0. These results suggest that higher levels of discomfort factors were dominant over the higher levels of relaxation in perceiving comfort while sitting. Higher levels of emotional factor relaxation became secondary when moderate or higher levels of physical discomfort factors were present. The results obtained support the findings by Helander and Zhang 1997 that physical factors are dominant over emotional factors in comfort and discomfort perception. The present results indicate that physical comfort needs are primary. Unless physical comfort needs are fulfilled, emotional comfort factors will affect comfort perception. Generally, the presence of higher levels of relaxation factor i.e., 5, 6 and 7 was higher with the lower levels of discomfort factors below 4. These associations also produced higher levels of mean comfort in general than did other combinations Table 9. Higher levels of relaxation were less frequent in the presence of higher levels of discomfort factors i.e., 5, 6 and 7 than at lower levels of discomfort. However, any association of this kind produced low levels of mean comfort. When relaxation level increased, mean comfort increased and this happened only while discomfort level was below 4. The results suggest that the transition of the sensation of relaxation from its dominant state to non-dominant state occurs at relaxation level 5 and when discomfort factor levels are level 4 or greater. The transition of discomfort factors from a dominant state to a non-dominant state may occur at discomfort levels 4 or less. According to the results presented, non-dominant zone for relaxation and discomfort factors may include relaxation levels between 1 and 5 and discomfort factors levels between 1 and 4. This may indicate that discomfort factors and relaxation can co-exist at certain levels. This is almost consistent with those obtained in Thariq and Munasinghe under review. Table 9. Interactions of discomfort factors average ratings of discomfort factors with relaxation in comfort perception Discomfort factor level Relaxation Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 -- -- 2.0 -- 1.0 -- 2 4.0 4.0 4.3 3.0 2.0 -- 3 3.0 3.3 3.6 3.3 1.7 -- 4 4.7 4.2 4.1 3.7 4.0 -- 5 5.0 4.9 5.1 4.0 3.0 -- 6 6.0 5.8 6.0 5.0 3.0 -- 7 5.0 6.5 -- -- -- 3.0 Note: ‘--‘ means combination of factors was not observed . M.G.Mohamed Thariq et al. AJE Vol.9 2009 79-98 92

3.8 Interactions of discomfort factors with relief in comfort perception

An extreme level of mean comfort level 7 was produced while relief was at extreme levels and sensation of discomfort factors was at lower levels Table 10. The association of relief levels 5 and 6 with discomfort factor level 5 produced mean comfort of 3.0 in both cases. These results show that the feeling of relief at higher levels is influenced when higher levels of discomfort factors are present. This suggests that the presence of higher levels of discomfort factors physical strain factor influences comfort perception. The results presented further indicate that physical comfort needs are primary. If physical comfort needs are not satisfied i.e., if higher levels of discomfort factors are present, the contribution of a higher sensation of relief to comfort perception diminishes. Generally, the presence of higher levels of relief i.e., 5, 6 and 7 was higher when the discomfort levels were below level 4. These interactions also produced higher levels of mean comfort in general than did other combinations Table 10. The presence of higher levels of relief sensations was very low in the presence of higher levels of discomfort factors. However, this type of association produced low levels of mean comfort. When relief level increased, mean comfort increased and this happened while discomfort level was below 4. The results suggest that, at similar sensations of relaxation, the transition of the sensations of relief from a dominant state to a non-dominant state may occur at level 5. At this stage discomfort factors levels reach level 4 from lower levels. The transition of discomfort factors from a dominant state to a non-dominant state may take place at level 4 or below. Therefore, the non-dominant zone between relief and discomfort factors may include relief levels from 1 to 5 and discomfort factors levels from 1 to 4. The results also suggest, as in the case of impression and relax, that discomfort factors and relief factor can co-exist at certain levels. These results are consistent with those by Thariq and Munasinghe under review. Table 10. Interactions of relief with discomfort factors average ratings of discomfort factors in comfort perception Discomfort factor level Relief Level 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 -- -- 5.0 -- 1.0 -- 2 -- 3.8 3.5 3.2 2.2 -- 3 -- 3.3 3.4 3.0 1.5 -- 4 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.8 4.0 3.0 5 5.2 5.1 4.7 4.8 3.0 -- 6 6.0 6.1 5.7 -- 3.0 -- 7 6.5 7.0 7.0 -- -- -- Note: ‘--‘ means combination of factors was not observed .

Dokumen yang terkait

Aplikasi Integrasi Metode Fuzzy Servqual dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus: SMP Swasta Cinta Rakyat 3 Pematangsiantar)

10 125 85

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

9 100 164

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : Di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

18 109 164

Penerapan Metode Kano, Quality Function Deployment Dan Value Engineering Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Produk Sarung Tangan Karet

11 73 101

Aplikasi Kansei Engineering Dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Serta Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch (TRIZ) Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Pada Instalasi Hemodialisis

9 92 70

Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Menggunakan Metode Quality Function Deployment (Qfd); (Studi Kasus Japanese Mathematics Center Sakamoto Method Cabang Multatuli Medan)

8 152 80

Integrasi Aplikasi Metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD) dengan Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Hotel, Studi Kasus: Hotel Grand Angkasa Internasional Medan

15 91 169

Redesign Of Perforator Through Integration Of Ergonomics Approach And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 4 24

Redesign Of A Cradle For Aircraft Maintenance Using Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24

Redesign Of A Hand Pallet Truck For Manufacturing Industry Using Integration Of Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24