CEI model and its framework

Seyyed Ali Moussavi-Najarkola AJE Vol.9 2009 63-78 66 Rating criterion Light Somewhat difficult Difficult Very difficult Near maximal Maximal Mean of force exertion perceived according to Borg 0-2 3 4-5 6-7 8-10 10 Mean of force exertion in of MVC 0-20 30 40-50 60-70 80-100 100 Multiplier factor 1 3 6 9 13 17

3.1. Force Exertion FE

FE can be defined as the amount of physical effort required to perform a task or maintain control of equipment 1, 2; it depends on the type of grip, the weight of the object, body posture, the type of activity, and the duration of the task 2. FE may depend on static or dynamic contractions 1. The need to exert force during work-related activities may be due to handling, lifting, lowering, moving or holding objects, or keeping them in a given position 3. The required force for performing various occupational actions is a critical factor producing WMSDs. The rate of exerted load or force on hand muscles can exceed hundreds of pounds. FE can be estimated using the Borg CR-l0 scale or by knowing the percent of Maximum Voluntary Contraction MVC from Table 1, which was derived from the model of CEN investigation 15 and the SI method 12.

3.2. Posture of Upper Limbs PU

Prolonged exposure to repetitive forceful exertion of the hand and wrist, especially in awkward postures, is strongly associated with tendon and nerve damage at the wrist and hand 17. Awkward postures include repeated or prolonged reaching, twisting, turning and bending hands, working with hands or arms, holding fixed positions, working with wrist bent for 2 hours per day 4; pressing the upper limbs against a hard or sharp edge, which can result in placing too much pressure on nerves, tendons and blood vessels; and using the palm of hand as a hammer regularly, or typing while resting arms or wrists on the hard desk edge 1. UEMSDs may be attributable to occupational, non- occupational and individual factors 2. In the CEI method, the posture of upper limbs includes those of the hand and fingers, wrist, forearm, elbow, arm, and shoulder. CEI assigns a score 4 for each of these parts and every part is divided into four awkward posture items. Thereby every part of the upper limbs can receive a maximal score of 4. The items which must be considered include 10: • Hand fingers: 1 Pinch grip Chronic Exposure Index Model to Assess Ergonomic Risk Factor Related to Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders 67 2 Tight grip 3 Hook grip 4 Palmar grip • Wrist: 1 Flexion 2 Extension 3 Radial deviation 4 Ulnar deviation • Forearm: 1 Supination 2 Pronation 3 Radial deviation 4 Ulnar deviation • Elbow: 1 Supination 2 Pronation 3 Flexion 4 Extension • Arm : 1 Abduction 2 Contracting arm for a long term 3 Turning inward 4 Turning outward • Shoulder : 1 Abduction 2 Pulling forward 3 Pulling backward 4 Holding at higher than shoulder level for a long term 3. Finally, the multiplier factor for PU of upper limbs Table 2 was extracted from 15 16 using the SI method 12. Table 2. Parameters for determining the multiplier factor for posture of upper limbs PU Rating criterion Very good Good Fair Bad Very bad Score of upper limb posture ≤ 4 5-8 9-12 13-16 16 Multiplier factor 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2.5 Table 3. Parameters for determining the multiplier factor for frequency of force FF exertion Frequency of force exertion per minute 4 4-8 9-14 15-19 19 Multiplier factor 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 Table 4. Parameters for determining the multiplier factor for duration of force exertion DF

Dokumen yang terkait

Aplikasi Integrasi Metode Fuzzy Servqual dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus: SMP Swasta Cinta Rakyat 3 Pematangsiantar)

10 125 85

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

9 100 164

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : Di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

18 109 164

Penerapan Metode Kano, Quality Function Deployment Dan Value Engineering Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Produk Sarung Tangan Karet

11 73 101

Aplikasi Kansei Engineering Dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Serta Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch (TRIZ) Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Pada Instalasi Hemodialisis

9 92 70

Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Menggunakan Metode Quality Function Deployment (Qfd); (Studi Kasus Japanese Mathematics Center Sakamoto Method Cabang Multatuli Medan)

8 152 80

Integrasi Aplikasi Metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD) dengan Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Hotel, Studi Kasus: Hotel Grand Angkasa Internasional Medan

15 91 169

Redesign Of Perforator Through Integration Of Ergonomics Approach And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 4 24

Redesign Of A Cradle For Aircraft Maintenance Using Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24

Redesign Of A Hand Pallet Truck For Manufacturing Industry Using Integration Of Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24