RULA analysis Modeling and evaluating the seat design

M.Y. Rosnaha et al. AJE Vol.9 2009 1-17 6 in a risk score between one and seven, where higher scores signify greater levels of apparent risk. RULA analysis examines the following risk factors: number of movements, static muscle work, force, working posture, and time worked without a break. RULA evaluates stress on each body part; the level of severity suggests which features of the chair should be modified to make it more comfortable.

2.4.2. Current seat measurement

Several measurements were taken on the current seat Figure 3.

3. Results

3.1. Sampling and Observation

The seats in the three buses sampled, none had armrests, headrests or seatbelts. Armrests support the arms and prevent or reduce arm, shoulder, and neck fatigue. The headrest supports the weight of the head to reduce amount of stress on the body. Therefore adding armrests and a headrest should reduce fatigue among bus drivers. However, the lack of a seat belt simply showed a disregard for safety.

3.2. Body part Symptom survey

The respondents for this study were mostly 12 31-40 years old and had worked as bus drivers for an average of 5-7 years. Of the 25 respondents, 18 indicated that they experience some musculoskeletal problems and 16 of these indicated that these problems first occurred after they had become drivers. In 23 of the workers, the most frequent problems were in the lower back, followed by pain in the neck or head 21, in the ankle or leg 20, in the thigh 17 and in the arm or hand 15. This result is consistent with that of the larger survey. Based on interviews and chair design observation, possible causes of the prevalent problems were identified Table 1.

3.4. Current Seat measurement

The measurements the current seat Table 3 will be compared with the relevant anthropometric data to recommend a new seat design. Development and Evaluation of Bus Seat Dimension to Improve the Fit and Comfort of Malaysian Bus Drivers 7 Figure 3. Seat dimensions measured. a. seat pan height, b. seat width, c. seat depth, d. backrest height, e. backrest width and g. lumbar support height, f. angle of inclination. Table 1. Summary of complaints and possible causes Driver Complaints Observation of Seat Used Lower back Absent or improper lumbar support Neckhead No headrest AnkleLeg Inadequate support; Inadequate leg room Thigh Seat height is not adjustable Armhand No armrest Table 2. Mean and standard deviation anthropometric. Dimension Mean SD Stature 164.63 5.57 Weight 72.31 11.88 Eye height 115.28 4.57 Shoulder height 98.54 4.06 Elbow-rest-height 64.37 3.31 Knee height with shoes 52.79 3.06 Knee height without shoes 50.15 2.48 Popliteal height with shoes 43.06 2.53 Popliteal height wo shoes 40.88 2.27 Elbow breadth 47.03 5.06 Hip breadth 35.23 4.11 Buttock-to-popliteal depth 43.47 3.04 Buttock-to-knee depth 54.10 3.37 Lumbar support height 42.50 9.16 Note: N=25, Units are in centimeters except for weight kg.

Dokumen yang terkait

Aplikasi Integrasi Metode Fuzzy Servqual dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan (Studi Kasus: SMP Swasta Cinta Rakyat 3 Pematangsiantar)

10 125 85

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

9 100 164

Integrasi Metode QFD (Quality Function Deployment) dan AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Produk Sabun Mandi Padat Antiseptik (Studi Kasus : Di PT. Oleochem and Soap Industri)

18 109 164

Penerapan Metode Kano, Quality Function Deployment Dan Value Engineering Untuk Peningkatan Mutu Produk Sarung Tangan Karet

11 73 101

Aplikasi Kansei Engineering Dan Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Serta Teoriya Resheniya Izobretatelskikh Zadatch (TRIZ) Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Rumah Sakit Pada Instalasi Hemodialisis

9 92 70

Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Menggunakan Metode Quality Function Deployment (Qfd); (Studi Kasus Japanese Mathematics Center Sakamoto Method Cabang Multatuli Medan)

8 152 80

Integrasi Aplikasi Metode Quality Function Deployment (QFD) dengan Blue Ocean Strategy (BOS) untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pelayanan Hotel, Studi Kasus: Hotel Grand Angkasa Internasional Medan

15 91 169

Redesign Of Perforator Through Integration Of Ergonomics Approach And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 4 24

Redesign Of A Cradle For Aircraft Maintenance Using Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24

Redesign Of A Hand Pallet Truck For Manufacturing Industry Using Integration Of Ergonomics Analysis And Quality Function Deployment (QFD).

0 2 24