1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Conceptual Framework Theoretical Hypothesis

analyzing and assessing the students’ writing test in pre-test and post-test, the analytic scale was used as described in table 3.1. 3 Table 3.1 Scale for a ssessing the students’ writing test Categories Score Criteria Content 30 —27 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Knowledge. Substantive. Thorough development of thesis. relevant to assigned topic. 26 —22 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Some knowledge of subject. Adequate range. Limited development of thesis. Mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail. 21 —17 FAIR TO POOR: Limited knowledge of subject. Little substance. Inadequate development of topic. 16 —13 VERY POOR: Does not show knowledge of subject. Non- substantive, non pertinent, or not enough to evaluate. Organization 20 —18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Fluent expression. Ideas clearly statedsupported. Succinct. Wellorganized. Logical sequencing. Cohesive. 17 —14 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Somewhat choppy. Loosely organized but main ideas stand out. Limited support. Logical but incomplete sequencing. 3 Arthur Hughes, Testing for Language Teacher, Second Edition, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2005 p. 104. Categories Score Criteria Organization 13 —10 FAIR TO POOR: Non-fluent. Ideas confused or disconnected. Lacks logical sequencing development. 9 —7 VERY POOR: Does not communicate. No organization.or not enough to evaluate. Vocabulary 20 —18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Sophisticated range. Effective wordidiom choice and usage. Word form mastery. Appropriate register. 17 —14 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Adequate range. Occasional errors of wordidiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured. 13 —10 FAIR TO POOR: Limited range. Frequent errors of wordidiom form, choice, usage. Meaning confused or obscured. 9 —7 VERY POOR: Essentially translation. Little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word form. Or not enough to evaluate. Language Use 25 —22 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Efffective complex constructions. Few errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions.

Dokumen yang terkait

A Descriptive Study on Grammatical Errors of the Eighth Grade Students' Narrative Text Writing at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 3

The Effect of Using Comic Strips on the Eighth Grade Students’ Recount Writing Achievement at SMPN 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

0 6 4

The Effect of Using Picture in Series on the Eighth Year Students' Writing Achievement at SMP Negeri 1 Tempurejo Jember

0 3 4

The Effect of Using Roundtable Technique on the Eighth Grade Students' Writing Achievement at SMPN 1 Wuluhan Jember in the 2014/2015 Academic Year

0 4 4

Grammatical Error Analysis of the Eighth Grade Students in Writing Descriptive Text at SMP Negeri 1 Jember in the 2013/2014 Academic Year

1 7 3

The Effectiveness of Using Storyboard Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Tenth Grade of MAN 1 Tangerang Selatan)

3 41 145

An Analysis of Students' Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP Trimulia Jakarta))

16 39 151

An Error Analysis on Students' Recount Writing (A Case Study at Second Year Students of SMP Mutiara Harapan)

0 12 0

The Relationship between Students' Creative Thinking Ability and Their Writing Recount Text Skill (A Corelational Study at the Eleventh Grade students of MA Khasanah Kebajikan Tangerang Selatan Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 10 0

The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method towards Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 11 Tangerang Selatan year 2015/2016)

0 3 72