RIGHTS AIPP
AIPP Regional Capacity Building Program - Training Manual on the UNDRIP
174 NATIONAL LAWPOLICY
CONTENT FURTHER REFERENCES
Martial Law in Burma On 17 and 18 July 1989, the martial Amnesty International,
law administration empowered the Myanmar Burma New military to impose death sentences Martial Law Provisions
on political opponents, including Allowing Summary or
people not accused of violence, Arbitrary Executions and
through summary judicial Recent Death Sentences
procedures that fall short of Imposed Under These
international standards for fair trial Provisions, AI Index: A S A and are contrary to the safeguards
161589 DISTR: SCCO enshrined in the Myanmar Judicial
GR, http:burmalibrary. Law. These deficiencies include
orgdocs316-15-89-ocr.p allowing the death penalty for non-
df violent, not clearly criminal or else
only minor offences, elimination of the right of appeal to a higher court
and apparent curtailments of the right to a defense, particularly as
regards the calling of defense witnesses.
Armed forces special power Special authority for the military to http:www.hrw.orgenn
act AFSPA 1958, in India shoot and kill on mere suspicion. ews20080817india-r
The law grants the military wide epeal-armed-forces-specia powers to arrest without warrant,
l-powers-act shoot to kill, and destroy property in
so-called “disturbed areas.” It also protects military personnel
responsible for serious crimes from
prosecution, creating a pervasive culture of impunity.
Oplan Bantay Laya of the A long-term, top-level and
Armed Forces of the comprehensive military operational
Philippines AFP plan of the AFP aimed at destroying
the Communist Party of the Philippines and its New People’s
Army by 2010. The Oplan specifically targets indigenous peoples’
territories because these generally mountainous and thickly forested
areas are thought to be strategically important to the NPA as guerrilla
strongholds. The Oplan also targets legitimate indigenous peoples’
organizations as “front organizations” of the Communist Party.
Module-8
RIGHTS AIPP
AIPP Regional Capacity Building Program - Training Manual on the UNDRIP
175 NATIONAL LAWPOLICY
CONTENT FURTHER REFERENCES
Prevention of Terrorism This law was enacted to repeal other http:lib.ohchr.orgHRBo
Act 2002, India laws and consolidate their contents: diesUPRDocumentsSes
Internal Security Act MISA, sion1INLIB_IND_UPR_S
Terrorist and Disruptive Activities 1_2008_Liberation_uprsub
[Prevention] Act TADA, Prevention mission.pdf of Terrorism Act POTA, the
Disturbed Areas Act DAA, the Armed Forces Special Powers Act
AFSPA, the Assam Preventive Detention Act, National Security
Act, Essential Services Maintenance Act, and the Armed Forces [Jammu
and Kashmir] Special Powers Act 1990.
The succesor law of 2002 is more draconian and heinous than its
predecessor in trying to quell “terrorism” and “threats to
national unity.”
2. Positive laws NATIONAL LAWPOLICY
CONTENT FURTHER REFERENCES
Law No 39199 on human Human rights, including the rights of www.hrw.orglegacyasia
rights in Indonesia indigenous peoples to self-identity,
indonesia land and territory.
Establishment of human Monitoring and reporting the
www.komnasham.go.id rights institutions as
development of human rights in government bodies in
the respective countries. countries such as the
Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand.
Ratification of international State obligation to comply with civil human rights instruments, and political rights as well as social,
such as ICCPR and ICESCR, economic and cultural rights, of their by the Philippines,
respective peoples. Indonesia, and Thailand.
C. Challenges of Naional Laws and Policies
1. Positive laws are not implemented or only passively, while negative laws are more
actively implemented. National governments in most Asian countries have passed laws that
contain both positive and negative elements: some favorable and some oppressive to indige-
nous peoples. The general trend, however, is for oppressive laws to be more actively implement-
Input the following, elaborating with case studies or inviting participants to
discuss cases they know of.
Suggested Method Module-8
RIGHTS AIPP
AIPP Regional Capacity Building Program - Training Manual on the UNDRIP
176
ed while the positive laws are only barely or ineffectively implemented. Examples of oppressive laws that are being implemented in full force: martial law in Burma, AFSPA of 1958 in Northeast
India, and Oplan Bantay Laya in the Philippines.
2. Government uses inconsistent and fragmented approach rather than human rights- based approach. Governments often rely on compartmentalized or sectoral approaches that
result in fragmented, inconsistent, or even contradictory implementation of laws and social ser- vices as applied to indigenous peoples. This is in contrast to the holistic and human-rights-based
approach, which is more effective. In addition, corrupt practices that are rampant within the government result in the misuse and depletion of funds supposedly allocated for indigenous
peoples.
3. Conflicts between national and local governments. Conflicts commonly exist between
between the national and local governments, particularly in the jurisdiction or division of pow- ers and functions that are relevant to human rights police powers and courts, for example,
and in the allocation and use of public resources. In most cases, national government priorities predominate, and local government concerns are relegated to the sidelines. These issues are also
connected to the question of autonomy and self-government in indigenous territories.
4. Persistent militarist mindset. A persistent militarist mindset continues to exist not only
within the armed forces, but also among civilian agencies and supposedly civilian law enforce- ment services. This mindset is totally hostile to the concept of human rights and its strict ob-
servance even in war or emergency conditions. It constantly erodes efforts to strictly observe human rights in actual practice, especially during military and police operations.
5. Particular defects as well as openings in the legal and judicial system. In each coun-
try or state system, we can identify particular defects as well as openings in the legal and judicial system that pose either advantages or disadvantages in the implementation of human rights
laws. Examples of defects and disadvantages: legal technicalities such as prescription expiration of case due to passage of many years, non-applicability to cases prior to the adoption of human
rights laws, and immunity of officials to suit, which are often invoked by governments to escape accountability for their human rights violations. This is on top of judicial corruption and intimi-
dation, which results in the dismissal of human rights cases. Examples of openings and advan- tages: the possibility of indigenous systems of law being used instead of, or to complement, the
modern legal and judicial system in protecting the human rights of IPs and in pursuing human rights cases.
IV. EXPERIENCES AND LESSONS LEARNED
A. Advocacy, Collecive and Asserive Ac- ions
EXAMPLES OF ADVOCACY, COLLECTIVE AND ASSERTIVE ACTIONS
Philippines
1. People’s organizations and com- munities launched anti-militarization
mobilizations in Cordillera to demand the Share the examples provided below or
ask the participants to engage in a shar- ing of experiences, but provide questions
to guide them.
Synthesize and input the lessons and tips below.
Suggested Method Module-8