Time of The Research Data Collecting Technique
The dialogic validity is the process of peer review that is commonly used in the academic research. This validity was fulfilled by discussing the research
findings with the collaborator and some students of English Education Department at UNY. The members of the discussion gave their opinions and their
criticisms about the research report. To enhance the trustworthiness of the data and to reduce the subjectivity in
analyzing the data, I used triangulation. Burns 1999: 163 states that triangulation is a way of arguing that
„if different methods of investigation produce the same result, then the data is likely to be valid‟. Furthermore, Burns 1999: 164
proposes four forms of triangulation. They are time, space, investigator, and theoretical triangulation. This research had time triangulation because the data of
the research were collected over a period of time in order to identify the factors that were involved in the change process. Then, to get the investigator
triangulation, I asked the collaborators to help me in the reflection steps so that it could avoid the biased interpretations. Also, this research had theoretical
triangulation since the data were analyzed from more than one perspective. In addition, in order to ensure the reliability, I used the scores of the
studen ts‟ vocabulary, interview transcripts and field notes. To obtain the data
about the teaching and learning process, I interviewed the collaborators, observed the teaching and learning processes, and interviewed the students who joined the
lesson.