Kesimpulan Saran KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

53

BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

A. Kesimpulan

Lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul mempunyai korelasi negatif yang tidak bermakna dengan kekuatan korelasi sangat lemah tehadap kadar glukosa darah puasa pada responden pria, sedangkan terdapat korelasi positif yang tidak bermakna antara lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang- panggul terhadap kadar glukosa darah puasa pada responden wanita yang merupakan penyandang diabetes melitus tipe 2 di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung.

B. Saran

1. Perlu dilakukannya penelitian lanjutan dengan memperbanyak jumlah sampel. 2. Pada penelitian korelasi selanjutnya dapat digunakan 2 kelompok responden, yaitu kelompok kontrol tanpa diabetes melitus tipe 2 dan kelompok responden dengan diabetes melitus tipe 2. Kelompok kontrol digunakan sebagai pembanding, sehingga dapat menunjukkan dan menjelaskan perbedaan hasil korelasi pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 dan tanpa diabetes melitus tipe 2. 3. Perlu dilakukannya wawancara lebih mendalam dengan responden terkait obat-obat yang dikonsumsi, berapa lama responden penelitian menderita DM, dan berapa lama responden berpuasa sebelum dilakukannya pengambilan darah, serta perlu dibandingkannya hasil wawancara dengan medical record responden agar didapatkan informasi yang lebih jelas terkait obat-obatan yang dikonsumsi responden. 4. Menggunakan rentang usia responden yang lebih dekat, yaitu per 10 tahun, misalnya rentang usia 40-50 tahun atau 50-60 tahun. Daftar Pustaka Al-khazrajy, Anwar, L., Raheem, Y.A., dan Hanoon, Y.K., 2010, Sex Differences in the Impact of Body Mass Index BMI and WaistHip WH Ratio on Patients with Metabolic Risk Factors in Baghdad, Global Journal of Health Science , 2 2, pp. 162. Chehrei, A., Sadrnia, S., Keshteli, A., Daneshmand, A., dan Rezaei, J., 2007, Correlation of Dyslipidemia with Waist to Height Ratio, Waist Circumference, and Body Mass Index in Iranian Adults, Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007 , 16 2, pp. 250. Cogill, B., 2003, Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guide, Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Washington, D.C., pp. 9. Dahlan, M..S., 2012, Statistik untuk Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, Deskriptif, Bivariat, dan Multivariat Dilengkapi Aplikasi dengan Menggunakan SPSS, Edisi 5, Salemba Medika, Jakarta, pp, 62-75, 170- 175. Dalton, M., Cameron, A.J., Zimmet, P.Z., Shaw, J.E., Jolley, D., Dunstan, D.W., et al ., 2003, Waist Circumference, Waist-Hip Ratio and Body Mass Index and Their Correlation With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Australian Adults, Journal of Internal Medicine, pp. 556, 560. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2008, Pedoman Pengendalian Diabetes Melitus dan Penyakit Metabolik , Direktorat Pengendalian Penyakit Tidak Menular, Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Penyakit dan Penyehatan Lingkungan, pp. 13. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 2009, Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah , pp. 38. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 2011, Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah , pp. 39. Dioum, A., Gartner, A., Bernard. M., Delpeuch, F., and Wade, S., 2005, Body Composition Predicted from Skinfold in African Women: a CrossValidation Study Using Air- Displacement Plethysmography and a Black-Specific Equation, National Institute of Health, pp. 93, 973-980. Direktorat Bina Pelayanan Penunjang Medik, 2011, Uji Fungsi Alat Kimia Klinis dan Hematologi , Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, pp. 2. Dudekula, A.B., Naik, J.L, dan Reddy, K.S.N., 2012, Correlation Bettwen Blood Sugars and Body Mass Index, Waist Circumference with Blood Presure Among The Type 2 Diabetes Patient, Asian J Exp Biol SCI, 3 2, pp. 380- 381. Eid, W.E, 2011, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in South Dakota: Focused Insight Into Prevalence, Physiology and Treatment, South Dakota Medicine , pp. 69. Firmansyah, M.A., 2013, Tatalaksana Diabetes Melitus Saat Puasa Ramadhan, Medical Education , 40 5, pp. 343. Grundy, S.M., 2004, Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Disease, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism , 89 6, pp. 2597. Gupta, R., Rastogi, P., Sarna, M., Gupta, VP., Sharma, SK., and Kothari, K., 2007, Body-Mass Index, Waist-Size, Waist-Hip Ratio and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Urban Subjects, J Assoc Physicians India 2007 , 55, pp. 623-625. Hannon, T.S., Rao, G., dan Arslanian, S.A., 2005, Chilhood Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Pediatrics, 116 2, pp. 475. Hardiman, S. L., Benanthus, I. L., Rustati,P. K., dan Susiyanti, E., 2009, Waist Circumference as a Predictor for Blood Glucuse Level, Univ Med, 28 2. Haris, S., dan Tambunan, T., 2009, Hipertensi pada Sindrom Metabolik, 11 4, pp. 259-260. Humayun, Anjum, Shah, Arbab, dan Sher, 2010, Comparison of Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference in Predicting Incident Diabetes, Pak J Physiol 2010 , 6 1, pp. 48. International Chair on Cardiometabolic Risk, 2011, WHR, Health Risk, and Intraabdominal Fat , http:www.myhealthywaist.orgevaluatingcmr clinicaltools waist-to-hip-ratiopage2index.htmlEbookPage, diakses pada 29 September 2013. International Diabetes Federation, 2006, Metabolic Syndrome, The IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of The Metabolic Syndrome , IDF Comunication, pp. 10-11. Jalal, F., Liputo, N.I., Susanti, N., dan Oenzil,F., 2006, Hubungan Lingkar Pinggang dengan Kadar Glukosa Darah, Trigliserida dan Tekanan Darah pada Etnis Minang di Kabupaten Padang Pariaman, Sumatra Barat , pp. 3-5, 13. Janghorbani, M., Amini, M., Rezvanian, H., Gouya, M., Delavari, A., Alikhani, S., et al., 2008, Association of Body Mass Index and Abdominal Obesity with Marital Status in Adult, Iranian Medicine, 11 3, pp. 274, 278. Kamath, A., Shivaprakash, G., dan Adhikari,P., 2012, Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patient Attending a Diabetes Clinic, Int J Biol Med Res, 2 3, pp. 637. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2010, Pedoman Teknis Sarana dan Prasarana Rumah Sakit Tipe B, Pusat Sarana, Prasarana dan Peralatan Kesehatan , Jakarta, pp. 56. Khairani, R., 2007, Prevalensi Dibetes Melitus dan Hubungannya dengan Kualitas Hidup Lanjut Usia di Masyarakat , 26 1, pp. 21. Kurniawan, I., 2010, Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 pada Usia Lanjut, 60 12, pp. 578. Lear, S.A., Humphries, K.H., Kohli, S., Chockalingam, A., Frohlich, J.J., dan Birmingham, C.L., 2007, Visceral Adipose Tissue Accumulation Differs According to Ethnic Background: Results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial M-CHAT, Am J Clin Nutr, pp. 86, 353. Liao, Y.L., Lin,S., dan Hsu, C.H, 2011, Waist Circumference is a Better Predictor than Body Mass Index of Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes, Int J Diabetes Metab , pp. 36-37. Lipoeto, N.I., Yerizel, E., Edward, E.Y.Z., dan Widuri, I., 2007, Hubungan Antara Nilai Antropometri dengan Kadar Glukosa Darah, Skripsi , Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Andalas, Sumatra Barat, pp. 3. Marjani, dan Abdoljalal, 2011, Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, Hip Circumference and Waist-To-Hip Ratio in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Gorgan, Iran, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 5 2, pp. 202. Munadi dan Ardinata, D., 2008, Perubahan Kadar Glukosa Darah Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 yang Terkonrol Setelah Mengkonsumsi Kurma, Majalah Kedokteran Nusantara , 41 1 pp. 30. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007, Anthropometry Procedures Manual , CDC, USA, pp. 1-3. National Obesity Forum, 2006, Waist Circumference, http:www.nationalobesityforum.org.ukhealthcareprofessionalsmainme nu-155assessment-mainmenu-168171-waist-circumference.html , diakses tanggal 10 Juli 2013. NHLBI, 2012, According to Waist Circumference, Guidelines on Overweight and Obesity: Electronic Textbook , http:www.nhlbi.nih.govguidelines obesitye_txtbktxgd4142.htm, diakses tanggal 25 April 2013. Notoatmodjo, S., 2005, Metodologi Penelitian Kesehatan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, pp. 145-147. Odenigbo, U.M., Odennigbo, U.C., Oguejiofor, O.C., and Adogu, P.O.U, 2011 Relationship of Waist Circumreference-Waist Hip Ratio and Body Mass Index as Predictors of Obesity in Adult Nigerians, Pak. J.Nutr., 10 1, pp. 15-18. Ohnishi, Saitoh, Takagi, Katoh, Chiba, Akasaka, et al., 2006, Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes in Individuals With Central Obesity in a Rural Japanese Population, Diabetes Care, 29 5, pp. 1128. Park, J., Choe, S.S., Choi, A.H., Kim, K.H., Yoon, M.J., Suganami, T., et al., 2006, Increase in Glucose-6-Phospate Dehydrogenase in Adipocytes Stimulates Oxidative Stress and Inflamatory Signals, Diabetes, 55, pp. 2939. Pongsatha, S., Morakot, N., Sangchun, K., and Chaovisitsaree, S., 2012, Correlation Between Waist Circumference and Other Factor in Menopausal Women in Thailand, Healt, 4 2, pp. 62-63. Retnaningsih, E., 2010, Model Prediksi Prevalensi Obesitas Pada Penduduk Umur Diatas 15 Tahun di Indonesia, Jurnal Pembangunan Manusia, 10 1, pp. 6. Rodrigues, L., 2011, What Do Men Really Look for in Women?, http:www.learnbodylanguage.orgbody_language_courting.html , diakses pada 25 April 2013. Sargowo, D. dan Andarini, S., 2011, The Relationship Between Food Intake and Adolescent Metabolic Syndrome, Kardiologi Indonesia, 32 1, pp. 20. Sastroasmoro, S. dan Ismael, S., 2010, Dasar-dasar Metodologi Penelitian Klinis, Sagung Seto, Jakarta, pp. 88. Savage, D.B., Petersen, K.F., and Shulman, G.I., 2005, Mechanisms of Insulin Resistance in Human and Possible Links With Inflammation, Hypertension, 45, pp. 829-830. Seidell, J.C., Perusse, L., Depres, J.P., dan Bouchrad,C., 2001, Waist and Hip circumreference Have Independent and Opposite Effects on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: The Quebec Family Study, Am.J.Clin.Nurt ., 74 1, pp. 315-321. Setiawan, M., 2009, Peran Resistensi Insulin, Adiponektin dan Inflamasi pada Kejadian Dislipidemia Ateroenik, Saintika Medika, 5 11, pp. 167-168. Shah, A., Bhandary, S., Malik, S.L, Risal, P., dan Koju.R., 2009, Waist Circumference and Waist-hip Ratio as Predictors of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Nepalese Population of Kavre District, Nepal Medical College Journal : NCMJ 2009, 11 4, pp. 261-267. Sherwood, L. 2007, Fisiologi Manusia : Dari Sel ke Sistem, Edisi 6, Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC, Jakarta, pp. 705, 708. Siani, A., Cappuccio, F.P., Barba, G., Trevisan, M., Farinaro, E., Iacone, R., et al., 2002, The Relationship of Waist Circumference to Blood Pressure and Glucose : The Olivetti Heart Study, The American Journal of Hipertension , 15 9, pp. 783. Soetiarto, F., Roselinda, dan Suhardi, 2010, Hubungan Diabetes Mellitus Dengan Obesitas Berdasarkan Indeks Massa Tubuh dan Lingkar Pinggang Data Riskesdas 2007, Laporan Penelitian , Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Biomedis dan Farmasi, Jakarta. Spiegel, M., dan Stephens, L., 2007, Statistik, edisi ketiga, diterjemahkan oleh Kastawan, W. dan Harmein, I., Erlangga, Jakarta, pp. 150. Sulistioningrum, E., 2010, Tinjauan Molekular dan Aspek Klinis Resistensi Insulin, Mandala of Healt, 4 2, pp. 132. Tjekyan, R.M.S., 2007, Risiko Penyakit Diabetes Mellitus Tipe 2 di Kalangan Peminum Kopi di Kotamadya Palembang Tahun 2006-2001, Kesehatan, 11 2, pp. 54. Trisnawati, S.K., dan Setyorogo, S., 2013, Faktor Risiko Kejadian Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Puskesmas Kecamatan Cengkareng Jakarta Barat Tahun 2012, Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 5 1, pp. 8. Sulistyoningrum, E., 2010, Tinjauan Molekuler dan Aspek Klinis Resistensi Insulin, Mandala of Healt, 4 2, pp. 113. Utomo, O.M., Azam, M., Anggraini, D.N., 2012, Pengaruh Senam Terhadap Kadar Gula Darah Penderita Diabetes, Unnes Journal of Public Healt, 1 1, pp. 37. Wang, Z. dan Hoy, W.E., 2004, Waist Circumference, Body Mass Index, Hip Circumference and Waist-to-Hip Ratio as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in Aboriginal People, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, pp. 58, 888-893. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., and King, H., 2004, Global Prevalence of Diabetes, Diabetes Care , 27 5, pp. 1051. Windutama, I.M., Adam, F.M.S., dan Adam, J.M.F., 2009, Adiponectin and Metabolic Syndrome, The Indonesian of Medical Science, 2 1, pp. 11. World Health Organization, 2008, Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio:Report of A WHO Expert Consultation , WHO, Geneva, pp. 5-15, 20, 27. LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Surat Keterangan Ijin Penelitian Lampiran 2. Ethical Clearance Lampiran 3. Informed Consent Lampiran 4. Panduan Wawancara Lampiran 5. Leaflet C. Halaman Depan D. Halaman Belakang Lampiran 6. Hasil Tes Laboratorium Lampiran 7. Validasi Instrument Pengukuran Responden Pria Lingkar Pinggang Mean SD CV Lingkar Panggul Rasio Lingkar Pinggang Panggul Mean SD CV 75.5 75.54 0.049 0.065 85.5 0.88 0.882 4x10 -3 0.453 75.5 85.5 0.88 75.6 85.2 0.89 75.6 85.6 0.88 75.5 85.6 0.88 Responden Wanita Lingkar Pinggang Mean SD CV Lingkar Panggul Rasio Lingkar Pinggang Panggul Mean SD CV 65.5 65.52 0.045 0.069 88.2 0.74 0.742 4.472x10 -3 0.603 65.5 88.2 0.74 65.5 88.0 0.74 65.5 88.0 0.74 65.6 87.8 0.75 Lampiran 8. Analisis Statistik A. Normalitas Karakteristik Umur, Lingkar Pinggang, RLPP, dan Kadar Glukosa Darah Puasa Responden Pria Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent USIA 39 100.0 .0 39 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error USIA Mean 60.51 1.573 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 57.33 Upper Bound 63.70 5 Trimmed Mean 60.60 Median 60.00 Variance 96.520 Std. Deviation 9.824 Minimum 41 Maximum 78 Range 37 Interquartile Range 15 Skewness .077 .378 Kurtosis -.670 .741 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. USIA .085 39 .200 .974 39 .492 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction . This is a lower bound of the true significance. Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent LINGKAR PINGGANG 39 100.0 .0 39 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error LINGKAR PINGGANG Mean 93.9351 1.49403 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 90.9106 Upper Bound 96.9596 5 Trimmed Mean 93.1419 Median 92.1700 Variance 87.053 Std. Deviation 9.33021 Minimum 73.60 Maximum 126.00 Range 52.40 Interquartile Range 9.77 Skewness 1.470 .378 Kurtosis 4.046 .741 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig. LINGKAR PINGGANG .182 39 .002 .870 39 .000 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL 39 100.0 .0 39 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL Mean .9505 .01455 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound .9211 Upper Bound .9800 5 Trimmed Mean .9439 Median .9400 Variance .008 Std. Deviation .09084 Minimum .81 Maximum 1.21 Range .40 Interquartile Range .08 Skewness 1.533 .378 Kurtosis 2.934 .741 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL .229 39 .000 .838 39 .000 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA 39 100.0 .0 39 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA Mean 196.97 12.728 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 171.21 Upper Bound 222.74 5 Trimmed Mean 190.27 Median 182.00 Variance 6.318E3 Std. Deviation 79.484 Minimum 98 Maximum 456 Range 358 Interquartile Range 104 Skewness 1.239 .378 Kurtosis 1.734 .741 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA .134 39 .076 .903 39 .003 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction B. Normalitas Karakteristik Umur, Lingkar Pinggang, RLPP, dan Kadar Glukosa Darah Puasa Responden Wanita Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent USIA 59 100.0 .0 59 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error USIA Mean 59.41 1.119 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 57.17 Upper Bound 61.65 5 Trimmed Mean 59.31 Median 58.00 Variance 73.901 Std. Deviation 8.597 Minimum 44 Maximum 77 Range 33 Interquartile Range 12 Skewness .320 .311 Kurtosis -.615 .613 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. USIA .150 59 .002 .955 59 .030 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent LINGKAR PINGGANG 59 100.0 .0 59 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error LINGKAR PINGGANG Mean 93.4142 1.36627 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 90.6793 Upper Bound 96.1491 5 Trimmed Mean 93.1058 Median 92.6000 Variance 110.135 Std. Deviation 1.04945E1 Minimum 72.00 Maximum 121.00 Range 49.00 Interquartile Range 13.47 Skewness .568 .311 Kurtosis .156 .613 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic Df Sig. Statistic df Sig. LINGKAR PINGGANG .104 59 .181 .970 59 .161 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL 59 100.0 .0 59 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL Mean .9020 .00899 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound .8840 Upper Bound .9200 5 Trimmed Mean .9045 Median .9100 Variance .005 Std. Deviation .06908 Minimum .75 Maximum 1.02 Range .27 Interquartile Range .11 Skewness -.397 .311 Kurtosis -.636 .613 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. RASIO LINGKAR PINGGANG PANGGUL .099 59 .200 .962 59 .059 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error LINGKAR PINGGANG Mean 93.4142 1.36627 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 90.6793 Upper Bound 96.1491 5 Trimmed Mean 93.1058 Median 92.6000 Variance 110.135 Std. Deviation 1.04945E1 Minimum 72.00 Maximum 121.00 Range 49.00 Interquartile Range 13.47 Skewness .568 .311 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction . This is a lower bound of the true significance. Case Processing Summary Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA 59 100.0 .0 59 100.0 Descriptives Statistic Std. Error KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA Mean 170.75 8.959 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 152.81 Upper Bound 188.68 5 Trimmed Mean 168.06 Median 157.00 Variance 4.735E3 Std. Deviation 68.814 Minimum 50 Maximum 357 Range 307 Interquartile Range 116 Skewness .639 .311 Kurtosis -.472 .613 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA .127 59 .019 .934 59 .003 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction C. Uji Normalitas Kadar Glukosa Darah Puasa pada Kelompok Responden Pria berdasarkan Lingkar Pinggang Case Processing Summary KLASIFIKA SI LP Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent KADAR GLUKOSA DARAHPUASA =90 cm 13 100.0 .0 13 100.0 90 cm 26 100.0 .0 26 100.0 Descriptives KLASIFIKASI_LP Statistic Std. Error KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA =90 cm Mean 204.00 14.335 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 172.77 Upper Bound 235.23 5 Trimmed Mean 203.33 Median 200.00 Variance 2.671E3 Std. Deviation 51.685 Minimum 111 Maximum 309 Range 198 Interquartile Range 69 Skewness .237 .616 Kurtosis .365 1.191 90 cm Mean 193.46 17.848 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 156.70 Upper Bound 230.22 5 Trimmed Mean 185.22 Median 171.00 Variance 8.282E3 Std. Deviation 91.007 Minimum 98 Maximum 456 Range 358 Interquartile Range 123 Skewness 1.357 .456 Kurtosis 1.448 .887 Tests of Normality KLASIFIKA SI LP Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA =90 cm .077 13 .200 .992 13 1.000 90 cm .200 26 .009 .853 26 .002 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction . This is a lower bound of the true significance. D. Uji Normalitas Kadar Glukosa Darah Puasa pada Kelompok Responden Wanita berdasarkan Lingkar Pinggang Case Processing Summary KLASIFIKA SI LINGKAR PINGGAN G Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percent KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA =80 cm 6 100.0 .0 6 100.0 80 cm 53 100.0 .0 53 100.0 Descriptives KLASIFIKASI LINGKAR PINGGANG Statistic Std. Error KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA =80 cm Mean 175.67 30.356 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 97.63 Upper Bound 253.70 5 Trimmed Mean 172.74 Median 153.00 Variance 5.529E3 Std. Deviation 74.358 Minimum 106 Maximum 298 Range 192 Interquartile Range 130 Skewness .988 .845 Kurtosis -.083 1.741 80 cm Mean 170.19 9.464 95 Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 151.20 Upper Bound 189.18 5 Trimmed Mean 167.60 Median 157.00 Variance 4.747E3 Std. Deviation 68.898 Minimum 50 Maximum 357 Range 307 Interquartile Range 118 Skewness .630 .327 Kurtosis -.426 .644 Tests of Normality KLASIFIKA SI LINGKAR PINGGAN G Kolmogorov-Smirnov a Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig. KADAR GLUKOSA DARAH PUASA =80 cm .212 6 .200 .899 6 .370 80 cm .125 53 .037 .937 53 .008 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction . This is a lower bound of the true significance.

E. Uji Normalitas Kadar Glukosa Darah Puasa pada Kelompok Responden Pria berdasarkan RLPP

Dokumen yang terkait

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap rasio kadar LDL/HDL pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung.

1 1 167

Korelasi lingkar pingang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap kadar trigliserida pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung.

0 0 157

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap kadar glukosa darah puasa pada mahasiswa dan mahasiswi di kampus III Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.

0 1 124

Korelasi lingkar pingang dan rasio lingkar pinggang panggul terhadap kadar trigliserida pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung

0 1 155

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang panggul terhadap kadar glukosa darah puasa pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung

0 2 112

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang panggul terhadap rasio kadar LDL HDL pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung

0 1 165

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap kadar trigliserida dalam darah - USD Repository

0 0 83

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap kadar glukosa darah puasa - USD Repository

0 0 91

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap tekanan darah pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung - USD Repository

0 0 145

Korelasi lingkar pinggang dan rasio lingkar pinggang-panggul terhadap rasio kadar kolesterol total/HDL pada diabetes melitus tipe 2 di RSUD Kabupaten Temanggung - USD Repository

0 0 163