To What Extent Five-minute Freewriting Can Reduce
                                                                                52
open-ended  question  which  proved  that  they  were  more  confident  because  they could  find  ideas  faster.  They  explained  that  they  were  trained  to  write  anything
freely so that they were accustomed to writingand finally they could think faster. Besides, one student said that they had already known the steps of how to write a
paragraph  through  five-minute  freewriting  so  that  they  can  find  idea  faster  than before. Hence, the researcher concluded that most of the students can find ideas
faster after using five-minute freewriting. The second statement is related to whether students can develop their idea
faster  after  using  five-minute  freewriting.  The  result  showed  that  twenty  one respondents 75 chose “agree”, and seven respondents 25 chose “disagree”.
Since  75  of  the  respondents  agreed,  it  means  that  most  of  the  respondents  can develop their idea faster after using five-minute freewriting. It was also supported
by  the  respondents’  answer  from  open-ended  question  which  related  to  what extent five-minute free
writing can reduce students’ anxiety. The researcher found out  that  the  respondents  learned  how  to  develop  ideas  through  five-minute
freewriting.  It  was  also  strengthened  by  the  result  of  the  interview  which explained that they could develop their ideas because the felt free and confident
as Respondent A stated: “…It helps me to develop my idea because I feel free and confident”.
The researcher found that there was an improvement of ideas development of student’s writing product see Appendix 9. The first writing product showed
that the student  got  60C and the lecturer wrote a note that he needed to  arrange
53
the  idea  and  sentence  better.  On  the  second  writing  product,  the  student  could show a good progress and got 85A.
The  next  statements  found  out  whether  the  students  could  develop  their topic  sentence  faster  after  using  five-minute  freewriting.  The  result  showed  that
one  respondent  3. 6  chose  “strongly  agree”,  nineteen  respondents  67.85
chose  “agree”,  eight  respondents  28.57  chose  “disagree”,  and  no  one  0 chose  “strongly  disagree”.  It  showed  that  71.45  3.6  for  strongly  agree  and
67.85  for  agree  of  the  respondents  could  develop  their  topic  sentence  after using  five-minute  freewriting.  Hence,  their  confidence  and  vocabulary  were
improved  and  they  could  develop  the  topic  sentence.  From  this  result,  the researcher  concluded  that  most  of  the  respondents  can  also  develop  their  topic
sentence faster after using five-minute freewriting. The  fourth  statement  was  about  whether  the  students  can  develop  their
paragraph  faster  after  using  five-minute  freewriting.  Based  on  the  result,  the researcher found out three respondents 10.
71 chose “strongly agree”, nineteen respondents 67.
85 of twenty eight respondents chose “agree”, six respondents 21.
42 chose “disagree”, and no one 0 chose “strongly disagree”. It showed that 78.55 10.7 for strongly agree and 67.85 for agree of the respondents
can  develop  their  paragraph  faster  after  using  five-minute  freewriting.  They claimed that freewriting helped them to write anything bravely. Thus, they could
be  more  confident  in  developing  a  paragraph.  They  enjoyed  writing  a  paragraph without  worrying  to  make  mistakes.  It  was  because  their  confidence  was
improved  which  motivated  them  to  develop  a  paragraph.  Thus,  it  can  be
54
concluded  that  most  of  the  respondents  can  develop  their  paragraph  faster  after using five-minute freewriting.
The next statement is used to find out whether the students could produce many  sentences  in  their  writing  product  after  using  five-minute  freewriting.  The
result  showed  that  one  respondent  3. 6  chose  “strongly  agree”,  twenty  three
82.14  of  twenty  eight  respondents  chos e  “agree”,  four  respondents  14.3
chose  “disagree”,  and  no  one  0  chose  “strongly  disagree”.  It  showed  that 85.74 3.6 for strongly agree and 82.14  for agreeof the respondents  could
produce  many  sentences  in  their  writing.  The  researcher  found  out  that  the respondents were motivated by five-minute freewriting and they were improving
along  the  semester.  One  of  the  improvements  was  the  increasing  of  word production. They admitted that they could produce many words in a limited time.
The  researcher  calculated  the  number  of  word  production  from  the  first, third,  and  fourth  freewriting  of  each  student  in  Paragraph  Writing  class.  The
following figure shows the r esult of one of the respondents’ word production.
Figure 4.1. The Number of Word Production of One Respondent ’s
Freewriting Product in Paragraph Writing class
55
The first bar from the bottom described the number of word production in the  first  freewriting  when  he  still  produced  less  than  20  words.  The  second  bar
described the number of word production in the third freewriting. While the third bar  mainly  described  the  fourth  freewriting.  In  the  first  freewriting,  he  produced
16  words,  while  in  the  second  freewriting  they  could  produce  78  words. Furthermore,  they  could  produce  79  words  in  the  fourth  freewriting.  The
researcher calculated the improvement of each freewritings’ word production. The improvement from the first freewriting to the third freewriting was 79.48 while
the  improvement  from  the  third  to  the  fourth  freewriting  was  1.2  .  From  the result  gathered, the researcher concluded that there was  an improvement  in  their
word production even though they had different proportion of improvement. The  researcher  also  calculated  the  number  of  word  production  of  a
student’s writing product. The first  writing of a  student’s writing product could produce 88 words. While the second writing of a student’s writing product could
produce  146  words  see  Appendix  9.  There  was  an  improvement  of  word production from 88 words to 146 words.