Research Instrument RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

prepositions, but meaning seldom obscured 17 – 11 FAIR TO POOR: major problems in simplecomplex contructions, frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions andor fragments, run ons, deletions, meaning confused or obscured 10 – 5 VERY POOR: virtually no mastery of sentence contruction rules, dominated by errors, does not communicate, or not enough to evaluate MECHANICS 5 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: demonstrate matery of conventions, few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing 4 GOOD TO AVERAGE: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, but meaning not obscured 3 FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, poor handwriting, meaning confused or obscured 2 VERY POOR:no mastery conventions, dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting illegible, or not enough evaluate

F. Data Analysis Technique

SPSS v.22 and t-test formula are used for analyzing the data. SPSS v.22 is used for analyzing normality and homogeneity of the test. Normality test is used to know whether the data from experimental and controlled class are normally distributed or not while homogeneity test is used to find out whether the data from two classes have the same variant in order that hypothesis can be tested by t-test or not. Furthermore, the use of t-test formula is to know the difference score between students who are taught with guided question technique and without the guided question technique. The formula of the t-test is: 3 t o = Explanation: t o = The value of ‘t’ count M x = Mean variable of experimental class M y = Mean variable of controlled class SE M1 = Standard error of experimental class SE M2 = Standard error of controlled class The procedures used are as follow: 1. Determining Mean Variable X: M x = ∑ 2. Determining Mean Variable Y: M y = ∑ 3. Determining Deviation Standard of Score of Variable X: SD x = ∑ 4. Determining Deviation Standard of Score of Variable Y: 3 Anas Sudijono, Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan,, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2014, p.314- 316. SD y = ∑ 5. Determining Standard Error of Mean Variable X: SE Mx = 6. Determining Standard Error of Mean Variable Y: SE My = 7. Determining Standard Error of difference of Mean Variable X and Mean Variable Y: SE Mx - My = 8. Determining t o with formula: t o = 9. Determining degree of freedom: df = N x + N y – 2

G. Statistical Hypothesis

The researcher stated the hypothesis as follow: 1. Null Hypothesis H o : There is no significant difference between the result after teaching recount text writing by using guided question technique and without using guided question technique at the eighth grade students of MTs. Negeri 13 Jakarta. 2. Alternative Hypothesis Ha: There is a significant difference between the result after teaching recount text writing by using guided question technique and without using guided question technique at the eighth grade students of MTs. Negeri 13 Jakarta. The criteria used to prove the hypothesis is as follow: a. If t-test t o t- table t t in significance degree 5, null hypothesis H o is rejected or alternative hypothesis H a is accepted. b. If t-test t o t- table t t in significance degree 5, null hypothesis H o is accepted. 34

CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS

A. Data Description

The result of this research was acquired from a writing test. The writing test was divided into pre-test and post-test. Pre-test was given in the first meeting and post test was given in the last meeting into both classes VIII-B as an experimental class and VIII-A as a controlled class. The data of each class will be explained below.

1. The Data of Experimental Class

The following table is the score of pre-test and post-test in the experimental class VIII-B. Table 4.1 The Students’ Pre-test and Post-test Score of Experimental Class Students Number Pre-test Post-test Gained Score 1 56 77 21 2 61 74 13 3 50 74 24 4 64 76 12 5 64 77 13 6 56 69 13 7 61 76 15 8 66 76 10 9 66 81 15 10 61 83 22 11 57 74 17 12 59 83 24 13 56 72 16 14 57 74 17

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of small group discussion on students' speaking skill A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of MTs. Darul Ma'arif Jakarta

0 3 89

The effectiveness of guided questions in teaching students’ narrative writing: an experimental study at the eighth grade students of MTs Pembangunan UIN Jakarta

0 4 101

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “FIND SOMEONE WHO” GAME TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL (A Pre-experimental Study of First Grade Students of Culinary Department at SMK Negeri 3 Tangerang)

1 19 117

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED WRITING FOR TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP N 1 Tulis in the Academic Year of 2014 2015)

0 15 175

The Effectiveness of Using Photograph Towards Students' Skill in Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Year Students of Nusantara Plus Junior High School)

0 10 121

The Effectiveness of Diary Writing on Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 166 Jakarta in the Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 13 112

The Effectiveness of Question Generation Strategy on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Tambun Selatan)

1 10 143

The Effectiveness of Using Story Mapping Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 127 Jakarta)

0 12 159