1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Place and Time of the Research Method of the Research

13 – 10 FAIR TO POOR: non-fluent, ideas confused or disconnected, lacks logical sequencing and development 9 – 7 VERY POOR: does not communicate, no organization, or not enough to evaluate VOCABULARY 20 – 18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: sophisticated range, effective wordidiom choice and usage, word form mastery, appropriate register 17 – 14 GOOD TO AVERAGE: adequete range, occasional errors of wordidiom form, choice, usage, meaning confused or obscured 13 – 10 FAIR TO POOR: limited range, frequent errors of wordidiom form, choice, usage, meaning confused or obscured 9 – 7 VERY POOR: essentially translation, little knowledge of english vocabulary, idiom, word form, or not enough LANGUAGE USE 25 – 22 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: effective complex constructions, few errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions 21 – 18 GOOD TO AVERAGE: effective but simple constructions, minor problems in complex contructions, several errors of agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions, but meaning seldom obscured 17 – 11 FAIR TO POOR: major problems in simplecomplex contructions, frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word orderfunction, articles, pronouns, prepositions andor fragments, run ons, deletions, meaning confused or obscured 10 – 5 VERY POOR: virtually no mastery of sentence contruction rules, dominated by errors, does not communicate, or not enough to evaluate MECHANICS 5 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: demonstrate matery of conventions, few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing 4 GOOD TO AVERAGE: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, but meaning not obscured 3 FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, poor handwriting, meaning confused or obscured 2 VERY POOR:no mastery conventions, dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting illegible, or not enough evaluate

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of small group discussion on students' speaking skill A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of MTs. Darul Ma'arif Jakarta

0 3 89

The effectiveness of guided questions in teaching students’ narrative writing: an experimental study at the eighth grade students of MTs Pembangunan UIN Jakarta

0 4 101

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PICTURE BOOKS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ SKILL IN WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP PGRI Ciputat)

1 18 147

The Effectiveness of Using Clustering Technique in Teaching Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Second Grade ofMts Negeri 3 Jakarta)

1 11 109

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF “FIND SOMEONE WHO” GAME TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILL (A Pre-experimental Study of First Grade Students of Culinary Department at SMK Negeri 3 Tangerang)

1 19 117

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED WRITING FOR TEACHING WRITING RECOUNT TEXT (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP N 1 Tulis in the Academic Year of 2014 2015)

0 15 175

The Effectiveness of Using Photograph Towards Students' Skill in Writing Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Year Students of Nusantara Plus Junior High School)

0 10 121

The Effectiveness of Diary Writing on Students' Writing of Recount Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade of SMPN 166 Jakarta in the Academic Year 2015/2016)

0 13 112

The Effectiveness of Question Generation Strategy on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Tambun Selatan)

1 10 143

The Effectiveness of Using Story Mapping Technique on Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (A Quasi-experimental Research at the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 127 Jakarta)

0 12 159