Summary FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS

used’ based on Oxford‘s classification. They were metacognitive strategy, compensation strategy, and social strategy. While the three other strategy groups fell into the category ‘sometimes used’, they were cognitive strategy, affective strategy, and memory strategy. From the finding above, it could be concluded that that indirect strategy groups being used more often that direct strategy groups by the respondents. The qualitative research found that respondents use each learning strategy in different rate. Memory strategy could be claimed as ‗rarely used‘ by the respondents. Then cognitive strategy could be claimed as ‗almost often‘ used. Compensation strategy fell into category of ‗almost often used‘ by respondents. And next metacognitive strategy is in the category of ‗almost often used‘. Then affective strategy is under the category of ‗quite often‘ used. Finally, social strategy was ‗rarely used‘by respondents.

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, AND SUGGESTIONS

In this chapter, three parts are presented. They are conclusions, implications, and suggestions. The discussion of each part is presented as follows.

A. Conclusions

As it has been mentioned above, the first research question is ‗what learning strategies are mostly used by the students?‘. This question will be answered by presenting the finding based on the two instruments used that have been mentioned in the previous part. The first instrument is a questionnaire adapted from Oxford‘s SILL Strategy Inventory Language Learning, which is the result later to be processed through computer programme SPSS 16.0 for windows. This results in some tables that had been presented and been discussed in the earlier chapter. The finding would be based on the result of the processed data from questionnaire that had been presented into a table. There are six groups of learning strategies in SILL that are divided into 50 statements. Each statement represents a certain learning strategy. The finding was on the mean score of each statement. The higher mean score means a strategy represented by the statement is more often used by respondents. Based on the finding, there are some learning strategies which are more dominant on each group. The first part is part A which represented ‘memory strategy’. There are nine statements in part A. Based on the finding, the strategies which is most dominant in part A is associatingelaborating, placing new words into context, and using keyword. The second part is part B which represents ‘cognitive strategy’. There are 14 statements in part B. The most dominant strategy in part B is using resources for receiving and sending messages, formally practicing with sounds and writing systems, recognizing using formulas and pattern, practising naturalistically, and repeating. The third part is part C which represented ‘compensation strategy’. There are six statements in part C. Based on the finding, the most dominant strategy in part C is using a circumlocution or synonym, using mime or gesture, guessing intelligently, and switching to the mother tongue. The fourth part is part D which represented ‘metacognitive strategy’. There are nine statements in part D and almost all statements in part D results in good mean score. This means that almost all strategies in metacognitive strategy are mostly used by respondents. The most dominant strategy in part D is finding out about language learning, paying attention, self-monitoring and self-evaluating, and seeking practice opportunities. The fifth part is part E which represented ‘affective strategy’. There are six statements in part E. The most dominant strategy in part E is lowering anxiety and encouraging yourself. The last part is part F which represented ‘social strategy’. There are six statements in part F. The most dominant strategy in part F is asking for clarification or verification and cooperating with peers. The second research question is ‗How do students apply the learning strategies to improve their English?‘. This can be answered by the interview result. Based on the interview result, some information is obtained on how respondents use learning strategies on their learning. First of all, almost all respondents stated they know only little information about learning strategy. Some respondents were also unaware that they had already used learning strategy

Dokumen yang terkait

A Technique Practiced By The Students Of English Department To Study English As A Foreign Language

0 36 43

The Ability Of Using Conditional Sentences By The Students Of Sma Cahaya Medan

1 57 80

The Realization Strategies of Refusals Used by Undergraduate Students of the English Department of State University of Semarang

0 9 95

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Apologizing Strategies Used By The Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 15

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISHDEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Apologizing Strategies Used By The Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 16

LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY THE EIGHTH GRADE OLYMPIC CLASS STUDENTS OF MTs Learning Strategies Used By The Eighth Grade Olympic Class Students Of MTs Negeri Tanon In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

1 3 19

LEARNING STRATEGIES IN READINGUSED BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS Learning Strategies In Reading Used By The Second Year Students Of Sma Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta.

0 1 13

DEVELOPING INTERACTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING MULTIMEDIA FOR THE STUDENTS OF PHYSICS EDUCATION DEPARTMENT YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2012/2013.

2 4 337

COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF DWIJENDRA UNIVERSITY IN LEARNING PROCESS

0 0 11

STRATEGIES USED BY STUDENTS IN LEARNING PHONOLOGY: A SURVEY AT THE SIXTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018 - Repository UNRAM

0 0 18