mean derived from the total score of the summary score divided by the total number of the participants. And the last column was standard deviation. Based on
Oxford‘s classification, the range of mean could be described as follows. The first one was the highest range, which was 4.5 to 5; meant the strategy was ‗always or
almost always used‘, then the second was ranged from 3.5 to 4.4; meant the strategy was sometimes used, and the third was ranged from 2.5 to 3.4; meant the
strategy ‗generally not used‘, and the last was ranged from 1.0 to 1.4; meant that the strategy was ‗never or almost never used‘. Then, only strategies which had
mean above 3.5 would be discussed later in discussion part.
Part A Statement
Frequency Percentage
Mean St. Dev
1 2
3 4
5 1
2 3
4 5
Par t A
1. 1
5 32 33 17
1.1 5.7
36.4 37.5 19.3 3.6818 .89115 2.
1 7
42 29 9 1.1
8.0 47.7 33.0 10.2 3.4318 .82762
3. 6 17 27 23 15 6.8 19.3 30.7 26.1 17.0 3.2727 1.16192
4. 8 19 27 24 10 9.1 21.6 30.7 27.3 11.4 3.1023 1.14510
5. 12 31 23 17 5 13.6 35.2 26.1 19.3 5.7 2.6818 1.10947
6. 29 29 19 8
3 33.0 33.0 21.6 9.1 3.4 2.1705 1.09567
7. 6 16 30 28 8
6.8 18.2 34.1 31.8 9.1 3.1818 1.05640 8.
1 20 43 19 5 1.1 22.7 48.9 21.6 5.7 3.0795 .84719
9. 8 11 25 25 19 9.1 12.5 28.4 28.4 21.6 3.4091 1.21897
Mean Total 3.1124
Table 3.1 Statistic result part A There are nine statements in part A. According to Oxford‘s classification,
only one number that fulfilled the average of the statement which showed the term ―usually used‖, that has mean above 3.5. These were the statement number 1,
number 2 and number 9. The highest score was the statement number 1 with mean
of 3.6818, while the lowest score was the statement number 6 with mean of 2.1705. And the last was the total mean for this part A which is 3.1124.
Part B Statement
Frequency Percentage
Mean St. Dev
1 2
3 4
5 1
2 3
4 5
Par t B
10. 1 11 29 33 14 1.1 12.5 33.0 37.5 15.9 3.5455 .94576
11. 1
6 21 37 23
1.1 6.8
23.9 42.0 26.1 3.8523 .92897 12.
1 3
23 41 20 1.1
3.4 26.1 46.6 22.7 3.8636 .84665
13. 2 11 34 30 11 2.3 12.5 38.6 34.1 12.5 3.4205 .94348
14. 2 21 26 31 8
2.3 23.9 29.5 35.2 9.1
3.2500 .99712 15.
1 5
22 25 35 1.1
5.7 25.0 28.4 39.8 4.0000 .99424
16. 1
9 30 31 17
1.1 10.2 34.1 35.2 19.3 3.6136 .95209
17. 2 18 36 20 12 2.3 20.5 40.9 22.7 13.6 3.2500 1.00858
18. 3
9 33 25 18
3.4 10.2 37.5 28.4 20.5 3.5227 1.03920
19. 3 17 26 32 10 3.4 19.3 29.5 36.4 11.4 3.3295 1.02522
20. 5 12 39 24 8
5.7 13.6 44.3 27.3 9.1
3.2045 .98447 21.
3 22 23 25 15 3.4 25.0 26.1 28.4 17.0 3.3068 1.12809 22.
6 12 27 26 17 6.8 13.6 30.7 29.5 19.3 3.4091 1.15108 23.
10 22 33 15 8 11.4 25.0 37.5 17.0 9.1 2.8750 1.11224 Mean Total
3.4602
Table 3.2 Statistic result part B There are 14 statements on part B. Based on the table above, some
statements showed mean higher than 3.5. The statement with highest mean is the statement number 15. Then, the second highest is statement number 12, and the
third highest is statement number 11. Then, statement number 16, number 10, and number 18 also have high mean above 3.5. The highest mean score for part B was
the statement number 15 with mean 4.000, whilst the lowest score was the