Findings Based on Questionnaire 6 17 27 23 15 6.8 19.3 30.7 26.1 17.0 2727 1.16192

mean derived from the total score of the summary score divided by the total number of the participants. And the last column was standard deviation. Based on Oxford‘s classification, the range of mean could be described as follows. The first one was the highest range, which was 4.5 to 5; meant the strategy was ‗always or almost always used‘, then the second was ranged from 3.5 to 4.4; meant the strategy was sometimes used, and the third was ranged from 2.5 to 3.4; meant the strategy ‗generally not used‘, and the last was ranged from 1.0 to 1.4; meant that the strategy was ‗never or almost never used‘. Then, only strategies which had mean above 3.5 would be discussed later in discussion part. Part A Statement Frequency Percentage Mean St. Dev 1 2

3 4

5 1

2 3

4 5 Par t A

1. 1

5 32 33 17

1.1 5.7

36.4 37.5 19.3 3.6818 .89115 2.

1 7 42 29 9 1.1

8.0 47.7 33.0 10.2 3.4318 .82762

3. 6 17 27 23 15 6.8 19.3 30.7 26.1 17.0 3.2727 1.16192

4. 8 19 27 24 10 9.1 21.6 30.7 27.3 11.4 3.1023 1.14510

5. 12 31 23 17 5 13.6 35.2 26.1 19.3 5.7 2.6818 1.10947

6. 29 29 19 8

3 33.0 33.0 21.6 9.1 3.4 2.1705 1.09567

7. 6 16 30 28 8

6.8 18.2 34.1 31.8 9.1 3.1818 1.05640 8.

1 20 43 19 5 1.1 22.7 48.9 21.6 5.7 3.0795 .84719 9. 8 11 25 25 19 9.1 12.5 28.4 28.4 21.6 3.4091 1.21897 Mean Total 3.1124 Table 3.1 Statistic result part A There are nine statements in part A. According to Oxford‘s classification, only one number that fulfilled the average of the statement which showed the term ―usually used‖, that has mean above 3.5. These were the statement number 1, number 2 and number 9. The highest score was the statement number 1 with mean of 3.6818, while the lowest score was the statement number 6 with mean of 2.1705. And the last was the total mean for this part A which is 3.1124. Part B Statement Frequency Percentage Mean St. Dev 1 2

3 4

5 1

2 3

4 5 Par t B

10. 1 11 29 33 14 1.1 12.5 33.0 37.5 15.9 3.5455 .94576

11. 1

6 21 37 23

1.1 6.8

23.9 42.0 26.1 3.8523 .92897 12.

1 3 23 41 20 1.1

3.4 26.1 46.6 22.7 3.8636 .84665

13. 2 11 34 30 11 2.3 12.5 38.6 34.1 12.5 3.4205 .94348

14. 2 21 26 31 8

2.3 23.9 29.5 35.2 9.1

3.2500 .99712 15. 1 5 22 25 35 1.1

5.7 25.0 28.4 39.8 4.0000 .99424

16. 1

9 30 31 17

1.1 10.2 34.1 35.2 19.3 3.6136 .95209

17. 2 18 36 20 12 2.3 20.5 40.9 22.7 13.6 3.2500 1.00858

18. 3

9 33 25 18

3.4 10.2 37.5 28.4 20.5 3.5227 1.03920

19. 3 17 26 32 10 3.4 19.3 29.5 36.4 11.4 3.3295 1.02522

20. 5 12 39 24 8

5.7 13.6 44.3 27.3 9.1

3.2045 .98447 21. 3 22 23 25 15 3.4 25.0 26.1 28.4 17.0 3.3068 1.12809 22. 6 12 27 26 17 6.8 13.6 30.7 29.5 19.3 3.4091 1.15108 23. 10 22 33 15 8 11.4 25.0 37.5 17.0 9.1 2.8750 1.11224 Mean Total 3.4602 Table 3.2 Statistic result part B There are 14 statements on part B. Based on the table above, some statements showed mean higher than 3.5. The statement with highest mean is the statement number 15. Then, the second highest is statement number 12, and the third highest is statement number 11. Then, statement number 16, number 10, and number 18 also have high mean above 3.5. The highest mean score for part B was the statement number 15 with mean 4.000, whilst the lowest score was the

Dokumen yang terkait

A Technique Practiced By The Students Of English Department To Study English As A Foreign Language

0 36 43

The Ability Of Using Conditional Sentences By The Students Of Sma Cahaya Medan

1 57 80

The Realization Strategies of Refusals Used by Undergraduate Students of the English Department of State University of Semarang

0 9 95

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Apologizing Strategies Used By The Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 15

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISHDEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Apologizing Strategies Used By The Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

0 2 16

LEARNING STRATEGIES USED BY THE EIGHTH GRADE OLYMPIC CLASS STUDENTS OF MTs Learning Strategies Used By The Eighth Grade Olympic Class Students Of MTs Negeri Tanon In 2016/2017 Academic Year.

1 3 19

LEARNING STRATEGIES IN READINGUSED BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS Learning Strategies In Reading Used By The Second Year Students Of Sma Muhammadiyah 1 Surakarta.

0 1 13

DEVELOPING INTERACTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING MULTIMEDIA FOR THE STUDENTS OF PHYSICS EDUCATION DEPARTMENT YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2012/2013.

2 4 337

COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES USED BY ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF DWIJENDRA UNIVERSITY IN LEARNING PROCESS

0 0 11

STRATEGIES USED BY STUDENTS IN LEARNING PHONOLOGY: A SURVEY AT THE SIXTH SEMESTER STUDENTS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM UNIVERSITY OF MATARAM IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018 - Repository UNRAM

0 0 18