Conclusions Implications CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

107 pronounce it correctly. It helped them to repair the students’ mistakes in pronouncing the words. It can be implied that giving feedbacks made the students more confidence and it could repair their mistakes.

C. Suggestions

Some suggestions are given to the participants who are closely related to this research. The suggestions are made based on the conclusions and implications of this research. They are presented as follows: 1. For the English teacher The English teacher should consider the students’ needs and interest before designing the speaking materials. It is important for the teacher to use various techniques that are appropriate with the students’ needs because it can reduce the students’ boredom and monotonous during teaching and learning process. It is useful for them to use TPS technique as one of the appropriate techniques in teaching speaking. 2. For Students Through the Think-Pair-Share technique, the students have opportunities to share their ideas. It also improves students’ ability and motivation. 3. For Other Researchers The weakness of this study is its limited time in implementing the actions. Other researchers who are interested in the same field are recommended to 108 implement the actions in a longer period of time to get more maximum results so that the improvement will be more significantly seen. 109 REFERENCES Arends, R.I. 2008. Learning to Teach: Belajar untuk Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan BSNP. 2006. Standar Kompetensi dan Kompetensi Dasar SMPMTS. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 2th ed. New York: Addison Wesley Longman,Inc. _________. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc. Burns, A. 1999. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press. _________. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching; A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Routledge. EAS 6 7. 2006. On Target: Strategies that Differentiate Instruction Grade K-4. Rapid City: BHSSCA. Accessed on www.decd.sa.gov.au February, 14 th 2014. Felder, R.M., Rebecca Brent. 2007. Cooperative Learning. In P.A. Mabrouk ed, Active Learning: Models from the analytical sciences pp.34- 53.Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. Harmer, J. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Longman. Johnson, D., Roger T.J., Marry, B.S. 2000. Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnerta Johnson, W., Roger, T. 2009. An Overview of Cooperative Learning. http: www.co-operation.org pagesoverviewpaper.html accessed Wednesday, December 18, 2013. Kagan, S. 1994. Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publications. Kaufman, D., Sutow, E. Dunn, K. 1997. Three Approaches of Cooperative Learning in Higher Education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, XXVII 2,3, 37-66. http:www.ojs.library.ubc.ca . Accessed on June 2, 2014 110 Kayi, H. 2006. Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No. 11, November 2006. http:iteslj.orgArticlesKayi Teaching Speaking.html. Retrieved on February 18, 2014. Knight, J. 2009. Cooperative Learning: version 1-2- October 16, 2009. Kansas: the Kansas Coaching Project. www.Instructional.org accessed Wednesday, December 18, 2013. Lie, A. 2008. Cooperative Learning: Mempraktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang- Ruang Kelas. Jakarta: PT Grasindo. Lyman, F. T. 1981. The Responsive Classroom Discussion: the Inclusion of all Students. In A. Anderson Ed., Mainstreaming Digest pp. 109-113. College Park: University of Maryland Press. Macpherson, A. 2007. Cooperative Learning Group Activities for Collage Courses- A Guide for Instructor. Surrey: Kwantlen University Collage McKay, S. L. 2008. Researching Second Language Classrooms. New Jersey: LEA Publishers. McTighe, J and F.T. Lyman. 1988. “Cuing Thinking in the Classroom: The Promise of Theory- Embedded Tools”, Educational Leadership, 1988, Vol.45, pp. 18- 24. Nunan, D. 2003. The Impact of English as a Global Language on Educatinal Policies and Practices in the Asia-Pasific Region TESOL Quarterly 374.589-613 Richardss, J. C., Renandya, W. A. 2002. Methodology in Language Teaching; An Anthology of Current Practice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Robertson, K. 2006. Increase Student Interaction with “Think-Pair-Shares” and “Circle Chats”. http:www.colorincolorado.org. Accessed on June 2, 2014. SCIMAST, E. 1994. Cooperative Learning. Classroom Compass 12. 2- 10. http:www.seld.org. Accessed on June 2, 2014. Spratt, M., Pulverness, A., Williams, M. 2005. The TKT Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Thornbury, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. London: Longman.