The Unit Design Research Findings 1. The Results of the Needs Analysis

67 c. Unit 3 In Unit 3, the materials are developed based on the syllabus made based on core competences 1, 2, 3, 4, and basic competences 1.1, 2.3, 3.6, 4.9 and 4.10. The title of this unit is “How to Manage a Hotel” and the topic is hotel management. As the title, the whole unit will discuss various methods in running a hotel. The unit clearly focuses on procedure texts. The focus of the grammar is the use of the imperative sentence. The core competences and basic competences require the students to be able to analyze the social function, the text structure, and the language features of procedure text and also to produce the text in both spoken and written form. The unit is divided into two cycles. They are spoken cycle and written cycle in which each consists of several tasks. In Unit 3, there are 25 tasks: 3 tasks belong to warm-up activities, 10 tasks belong to reading and writing activities, 11 tasks belong to listening and speaking activities, and 1 task belongs to homework activity. The description of each task is in Appendix E.

5. The Expert Judgment

After the first draft of the materials was developed, the next step was the expert judgment. As the name, in this step, the materials were evaluated and judged by an expert. The expert was Suharso, M.Pd. He is a lecturer of English Education Department of Yogyakarta State University who has thirty-year experience of teaching. The results of the expert judgment will be elaborated as follows: 68

a. The Results of the Expert Judgment and Revisions of Unit 1

1 The Results of the Expert Judgment of Unit 1 In the process of expert judgment, there were four aspects of materials that were evaluated: the appropriateness of the content, the appropriateness of the language, the appropriateness of the presentation, and the appropriateness of the graphic. Following are the results of the analysis of the expert judgment of Unit 1. a The Appropriateness of the Content In evaluating the developed materials, the first aspec t to evaluate is the appropriateness of the content. The results of the analysis of the appropriateness of the content of Unit 1 are presented in Table 35. In Table 35, it is shown that the mean value of the appropriateness of the content of Unit 1 is 3.1. This value is in the range of 2.5 ≤ X ¯ ≤ 3.24 which means that the appropriateness of the content of Unit 1 is categorized as “Good”. Form this result, it can be concluded that the content of the materials was appropriate. However, there were some inputs and suggestions given by the expert. The expert suggested that the texts in Unit 1 should be more relevant to the two core competences. Some texts in Unit 1 needed to be revised in some parts so that it would become appropriate for the students to learn