17
utterances. This will need a pragmatic approach to know the presupposition between the speaker and also the hearer. After that, the writer will find out
whether the intention of the speaker clearly understood or not by the hearer. If it is not clearly understood, some factors causing the misunderstood will be
revealed. The fourth step is organizing all of the collected data that have been
analyzed in the table which is placed in appendices pages to make them easier to be explained systematically.
18
CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
This chapter consists of two minor chapters related with the problem formulations in this present study. The first subchapter deals with the analysis to
answer the first problem formulated in chapter two, which is to classify the collected data by identify the purposes of the sarcastic utterances in Two Broke
Girls TV Series Episodes 1, Season 1 to Season 5. The problem will be answered by applying Salvatore Attardo
‟s theory in his article Humor and Irony in Interaction: From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection 2001 which listed six
purposes of sarcasm. The second subchapter covers the analysis of the second problem
formulated in this study, which is to identify how the response from the characters which being the hearer of the sarcastic utterances appearing in the Two Broke
Girls TV Series in Episodes 1 from Season 1 to Season 5 by applying the pragmatics theories related to how hearer infers the utterance looks at the co-text
and the context of the utterance.
A. Purposes of Sarcastic Utterances
In this first subchapter, the writer does the conversational analysis starting by classifying the collected data based on the purposes. The data taken
from the subtitles Two Broke Girls TV Series in Episodes 1 from Season 1 to Season 5 are the examples of conversational style among friends, in this case is
sarcasm. In order to understand any words spoken by the speaker, one must know PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
