To State the Speaker’s Opinion

66

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

Based on the findings and discussion in Chapter IV, conclusion can be drawn . The researcher formulates the conclusion as follows . 1. There are five types of dispreferred responses found in How to Train Your Dragon 2 movie . They are the dispreferred response of 1 assessment- disagreement, 2 invitationoffer-rejection, 3 request-refusal, 4 question- nounexpected answer, and 5 blame-admission . From five types of dispreferred responses, the dispreferred responses of assessment-disagreement are the main type regularly performed by Hiccup in How to Train Your Dragon 2 movie . The relationship between Hiccup and the other characters is the main reason of the dispreferred responses found in this movie. Since Hiccup is a character that is seen a bit rebellious, he often responded to the first speaker’s assessment or opinion of him negatively . 2. There are six functions of dispreferred responses found in How to Train Your Dragon 2 movie . All functions are based on the situational context in which the conversations are produced . The functions of the dispreferred responses are 1 to state the speaker’s disagreement, 2 to defend the speaker’s argument, 3 to clear the misunderstanding, 4 to state the speaker’s own reason, 5 to show that the speaker is not interested in the topic, and 6 to state the speaker’s opinion . Among the six functions presented in the findings, it can be seen that Hiccup often uses the dispreferred responses to state the speaker’s disagreement and to state the speaker’s opinion . Those functions appear as a result of Hiccup’s disagreement with the first speaker’s opinion or assessment of him .

B. Suggestion

Due to her limited ability and time, the researcher only conducts a study on dispreferred responses found in How to Train Your Dragon 2 Movie. Thus, the researcher suggested that other researchers conduct a research in pragmatic field with different points of view and sources of data. There are many other topics regarding conversations that can be researched, such as cooperative principle, speech act, implicature, and politeness. 68 REFERENCES

A. Printed Source

Bogdan, R. C. Biklen, S. K. 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: an Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn Bacon. Burns, R. B. 1994. Introduction to Research Methods. 2 nd Edition. Melbourne: Longman. Farahsita, R. A. 2012. “A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Adjacency Pairs in the Classroom Scenes of Freedom Writers the Movie”. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: State University of Yogyakarta. Goodwin, C. Heritage, J. 1990. “Conversation Analysis”. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 19, 1990, pp. 283-307. Annual Reviews. Hancock, B., Ockleford, E. Windridge, K. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Nottingham: University Park. Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Liddicoat, A. J. 2007. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum. Mey, J. L. 2009. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier, Ltd. . 1993. Pragmatics: an Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. Nunan, D. 1993. Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin English. Ltd. Pomerantz, A. Heritage, J. 2012. “Preference”. In J. Sidnell T. Stivers Eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis pp. 210-228. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. Sacks. H., Schegloff, E. A. Jefferson, G. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation”. Language, Vol. 50, No.4, Part 1., pp. 696-735. Linguistic Society of America. Tsui, A. B. M. 1994. English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wardaugh, R. 2006. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Fifth Edition. Victoria: Blackwell Publishing. Wati, F. S. 2015. “A Conversational Analysis of Dispreferred Social Acts in Jumping the Broom Movie”. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: State University of Yogyakarta. Wiersma, W. 1995. Research Methods In Education: An Introduction. Sixth Edition. Boston: Allyn Bacon. Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

B. Electronic Source

Beach, W. A. 1993. “Transitional Regularites for Casual ‘Okay’ Usages”. Journal of Pragmatics. Retrieved from http:www- rohan.sdsu.edu~wbeachtransitional_regularity.pdf on June 28 th , 2015. DeBlois, D. 2014. How to Train Your Dragon 2. Retrieved from www.dwaawards.compdfscreenplay.pdf on March 1 st , 2015. Golafshani, N. 2003. “Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research”. The Qualitative Report, 84, 597-606. Retrieved from http:nsuworks.nova.edutqrvol8iss46 on April 27 th , 2015. Jalilifar, A. R. Dinarvand, R. 2013. “An Analysis of Iranian EFL Learners’ Dis- preferred Responses in Interactional Discourse”. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills JTLS. 5 1, Spring 2013, Ser. 704. Retrieved from http:jtls.shirazu.ac.irpdf_1492_03f8c7fd26d9b9bb594be4798def171 b on February 12 th , 2015.