79
c. Observing for Cycle 3
In  this  stage,  the  researcher  had  roles  as  an  observer  and  a  teacher. Observing  the  teaching- learning  activity  was  done  in  the  same  time  with
implementation activity. The data was obtained from observation sheet results and students’ participation checklist results.
1 Observation Sheet Results
Table 4.8 Observation Sheet of Researcher’s Activity
No. Aspects
Teacher’s Response
Yes No
1. The teacher gives the students some question related to the
material in the beginning of the lesson 
2. The teacher explains the material from the handout
 3.
The teacher gives the opportunity to the students to ask about the material to the teacher
 4.
The teacher divided the students in a group of six in the home group
 5.
The teacher asks the students to read the text loudly in the home group
 6.
The teacher asks the students to move to the same text group 
7. The teacher asks the students to share their  text in the expert
group 
8. The teacher asks the students to ask their friend about the text
in the expert group 
9. The teacher asks the students to come back in their home
group 
10.  The teacher asks the students to tell the content of their text to their home group
 11.  The teacher interacts and involves with the students in the
group 
12.  The teacher moves around in each group 
13.  The teacher asks the students to answer the worksheet 
14.  The teacher warns the students who make noises 
15.  The teacher gives feedback to the students 
80 Table  4.8  showed  that  the  researcher  could  deliver  the  material  orderly.
The  researcher  could  also  manage  the  time  wisely.  There  was  time  to  give feedback  and  discuss  the  material  in  the  end  of  the  lesson.  The  researcher
motivated the students to be active by  letting the students ask questions about the material. Besides, the researcher interacted with the students by moving around in
the groups. The researcher encouraged them to comprehend the text in the group.
Table 4.9 Observation Sheet of Students’ Activity
No. Aspects
Students’ Response
Yes No
1. The students answer questions related to the material in the
beginning of the lesson 
2. The students pay attention to the teacher in explaining the
material 
3. The students ask questions about material to the teacher
 4.
The students gather in a group of six in the home group 
5. The students read the text loudly in the home group
 6.
The students move to the same text group 
7. The students share their text in the expert group
 8.
The students ask their friend about the text in the expert group 
9. The students return to their home group
 10.  The students tell the content of their  text to their home group
 11.  The students answer the worksheet
Table  4.9  revealed  that  the  students  obeyed  the  instruction.  They  paid attention to  the researcher
’s explanation about. The students used the opportunity to  ask  about  difficult  vocabularies  and  the  material.  The  students  actively
participated in the groups by sharing their ideas. The students helped each other to understand  the  meaning of  the  text.  They considered  their  friends as the  resource
to  comprehend  the  text.  In  this  cycle,  the  researcher  could  see  the  students’ participation increased maximally. All students answered the worksheet.
81
2 Students’ Participation Checklist Result
In this observation, the researcher divided the results into home group part 1  result,  expert  group  result,  home  group  part  2  result,  and  the  students’
participation table. a Home Group Part 1 Result
In  the home  group, the students read the text one by one. In this cycle, 30 students  read  the  text  loudly.  The  students  were  accustomed  to  do ing  the
activities. All students read  the text  loudly by  standing  in  front of  their  friends  in the group. This home group part 1 activity took ten minutes.
b Expert Group Result There  were  22  students  who  asked  their  friends  about  the  text.  In  this
section,  the  students  made  improvement  in  asking  their  friends  about  the  text.  It was  because  there  were  some  difficult  vocabularies  which  offered  in  each  text.
Besides,  27  students  shared  the  content  of  the  text  in  this  expert  group.  They comprehended  the  content  of  the  text  by  checking  the  difficult  words  in  the
dictionaries. In this  cycle, the students contributed their participation  maximally. This expert group activity took twenty five minutes.
c Home Group Part 2 Result There  were 29 students  who retold the content of the  text.  They retold the
content of the text by  using  Indonesian and English. The students told the content of  the  text  with  their  own  words.  In  this  cycle,  the  researcher  felt  satisfy  to  see
their  performance  in  the  home  group.  The  students  returned  to  their  normal  sit
82 place  to  fill the worksheet. 30  students answered  the questions  in the worksheet.
They  could  work  individually.  This  home  group  part  2  activity  took  thirty  five minutes.
d Students’ Participation Table
Table 4.10 Students’ Participation of Cycle 3
No. Criteria
Quantity  Percentage  Qualification 1.
Reading the text loudly 30
100 High
2. Asking questions related to the
text to their friends 22
73.3 Medium
3. Sharing the content of the text to
friends 27
90 High
4. Retelling the content of the text
to their friends 29
96.7 High
5. Answering questions related to
the text in worksheet 30
100 High
6. Asking question related the
material to the teacher 18
60 Medium
Table 4.10 showed that the students’ participation increased in almost all aspects. The students gave their contribution each activity. The qualification of the
students’  participation  showed  that  the  students  revealed  the  high  and  medium levels. The result  indicated  to  finish
the cycle because the students’ participation had already  in  high achievement.  The students could  follow the  use of  the jigsaw
technique in learning various descriptive texts.
d. Reflecting for Cycle 3