79
c. Observing for Cycle 3
In this stage, the researcher had roles as an observer and a teacher. Observing the teaching- learning activity was done in the same time with
implementation activity. The data was obtained from observation sheet results and students’ participation checklist results.
1 Observation Sheet Results
Table 4.8 Observation Sheet of Researcher’s Activity
No. Aspects
Teacher’s Response
Yes No
1. The teacher gives the students some question related to the
material in the beginning of the lesson
2. The teacher explains the material from the handout
3.
The teacher gives the opportunity to the students to ask about the material to the teacher
4.
The teacher divided the students in a group of six in the home group
5.
The teacher asks the students to read the text loudly in the home group
6.
The teacher asks the students to move to the same text group
7. The teacher asks the students to share their text in the expert
group
8. The teacher asks the students to ask their friend about the text
in the expert group
9. The teacher asks the students to come back in their home
group
10. The teacher asks the students to tell the content of their text to their home group
11. The teacher interacts and involves with the students in the
group
12. The teacher moves around in each group
13. The teacher asks the students to answer the worksheet
14. The teacher warns the students who make noises
15. The teacher gives feedback to the students
80 Table 4.8 showed that the researcher could deliver the material orderly.
The researcher could also manage the time wisely. There was time to give feedback and discuss the material in the end of the lesson. The researcher
motivated the students to be active by letting the students ask questions about the material. Besides, the researcher interacted with the students by moving around in
the groups. The researcher encouraged them to comprehend the text in the group.
Table 4.9 Observation Sheet of Students’ Activity
No. Aspects
Students’ Response
Yes No
1. The students answer questions related to the material in the
beginning of the lesson
2. The students pay attention to the teacher in explaining the
material
3. The students ask questions about material to the teacher
4.
The students gather in a group of six in the home group
5. The students read the text loudly in the home group
6.
The students move to the same text group
7. The students share their text in the expert group
8.
The students ask their friend about the text in the expert group
9. The students return to their home group
10. The students tell the content of their text to their home group
11. The students answer the worksheet
Table 4.9 revealed that the students obeyed the instruction. They paid attention to the researcher
’s explanation about. The students used the opportunity to ask about difficult vocabularies and the material. The students actively
participated in the groups by sharing their ideas. The students helped each other to understand the meaning of the text. They considered their friends as the resource
to comprehend the text. In this cycle, the researcher could see the students’ participation increased maximally. All students answered the worksheet.
81
2 Students’ Participation Checklist Result
In this observation, the researcher divided the results into home group part 1 result, expert group result, home group part 2 result, and the students’
participation table. a Home Group Part 1 Result
In the home group, the students read the text one by one. In this cycle, 30 students read the text loudly. The students were accustomed to do ing the
activities. All students read the text loudly by standing in front of their friends in the group. This home group part 1 activity took ten minutes.
b Expert Group Result There were 22 students who asked their friends about the text. In this
section, the students made improvement in asking their friends about the text. It was because there were some difficult vocabularies which offered in each text.
Besides, 27 students shared the content of the text in this expert group. They comprehended the content of the text by checking the difficult words in the
dictionaries. In this cycle, the students contributed their participation maximally. This expert group activity took twenty five minutes.
c Home Group Part 2 Result There were 29 students who retold the content of the text. They retold the
content of the text by using Indonesian and English. The students told the content of the text with their own words. In this cycle, the researcher felt satisfy to see
their performance in the home group. The students returned to their normal sit
82 place to fill the worksheet. 30 students answered the questions in the worksheet.
They could work individually. This home group part 2 activity took thirty five minutes.
d Students’ Participation Table
Table 4.10 Students’ Participation of Cycle 3
No. Criteria
Quantity Percentage Qualification 1.
Reading the text loudly 30
100 High
2. Asking questions related to the
text to their friends 22
73.3 Medium
3. Sharing the content of the text to
friends 27
90 High
4. Retelling the content of the text
to their friends 29
96.7 High
5. Answering questions related to
the text in worksheet 30
100 High
6. Asking question related the
material to the teacher 18
60 Medium
Table 4.10 showed that the students’ participation increased in almost all aspects. The students gave their contribution each activity. The qualification of the
students’ participation showed that the students revealed the high and medium levels. The result indicated to finish
the cycle because the students’ participation had already in high achievement. The students could follow the use of the jigsaw
technique in learning various descriptive texts.
d. Reflecting for Cycle 3