72 content of the text.
The result revealed that the students’ participation were not in low  levels  anymore.  Their  participation  increased  by  the  implementation  of  the
jigsaw technique.
d. Reflecting for Cycle 2
In this stage, the researcher obtained the data thro ugh teacher’s field notes
and researcher’s field notes. The researcher noted the important things occurred in the  class  in  the  field  notes.  The  English  teacher  of  class  VII.10  as  the  observer
also made field notes for the researcher.
1 Teacher’s Field Notes Result
The  English teacher stated that  when  the  researcher  left  the students who were discussing, they talked about other  things. She added  that some students did
not  pay  attention  to  the  students  who  retold  about  the  text  in  the  home  group. Therefore, it made them copied their friends
’ work to fill the worksheet.
2 Researcher’s Field Notes Result
The researcher  found  that the  students could comprehend the text clearly. It  was because each  group only  had  responsibility to comprehend one  text. They
really  tried  to  understand  their  texts  in  the  expert  group  by  translating  the  text. They  checked  the  meaning  of  the  difficult  vocabularies  in  the  dictionaries.
However, the researcher felt that the students’ participation in sharing the content of the text reduced rather than  in  the
previous cycle. The students’ situation was very  noisy. In this expert group, the students still  liked to talk about another thing
outside  the  material  when  they  had  already  comprehended  the  text.  Besides,  she
73 found  that  the  students  showed  their  texts  to  the  other  friends  when  they  retold
their text in the home group. Then, the  researcher summarized six  important things that occ urred  in the
implementation  of  the  jigsaw  technique  for  the  second  cycle.  They  were  1 grouping  movement was  faster than cycle one, 2 the students comprehended the
text  by  translating  the  text,  3  the  students  talked  another  thing  in  the  expert group,  4  the  students  still  copied
their  friends’ work  in answering questions  in the  worksheet,  5  they  have already been accustomed to standing  up when they
read  the  text  in  home  group,  6  s tudents’ participation  for sharing and retelling
the text in the group decreased from cycle one to cycle two.
3 The Planning to Solve the Problems
In  order  to  solve  the  problem  occurred  in  cycle  2,  the  researcher  tried  to make  the  best  solution.  In  the  case  of  c
opying  the  other  students’  work,  the researcher  had  to  consider  the  way  to  make  the  students  work  individually.  The
researcher planned to ask the students to do the worksheet in the normal sit, not in the  group.  Therefore,  they  could  answer  the  questions  in  the  worksheet
individually.  The researcher wanted to know their  individual  understanding of the text through the  use of the jigsaw technique. While  for the problem of decreasing
the students’ participation in sharing the text and retelling the content of the text, the researcher made a treatment for the students. The students must stand up when
they shared and retold the content of the text.
74 The  researcher  planned  to  make  a  new  activity  to  decrease  the  students
talk about other  things.  The teacher  made a  list of difficult  vocabularies  for each text  in  the  white  board.  The  students  had  responsibility  to  find  and  write  the
meaning of the vocabulary in the white board. It would make them busy with their works.
3. Cycle 3