65
28 Rijal Astian Hadly
44 52
60 29
Neneng intan Pandini 48
60
68
68 Nida Hadaya
52 64
72
31 Rafly Adi Saputra
48 60
68
32 Reynald Agusta Alex
44 60
72
33 Riki Anwar
48 56
68
34 Rizal Wahyudi
68 72
68
35 Ruliansyah
68 72
80
36 Sanju Yudistira Pradomas
44 52
68
37 Septi Kris Triastuti
56 68
68
38 Shafira Febianti
48 56
68
39 Shifa Ulniza
44 68
72
40 Suryani
52 68
68
41 Susanto
56 60
80
42 Vika Nurtila Adheliana
60 68
80
43 Viqi Indrianto
36 48
72
44 Wahyu Adia Widiasari
68 72
80
45 Yosef Oktavianus Mauboy
64 72
76 Total
2284 2748
3188 a.
The result of post-test 1
The result of post test 1 showed that there are only 19 of 45 students who passed the KKM 65. The mean score from the students
score is 61.1 and the percentage of students who passed the KKM is 42.2 . The improvement prom pre-test to post-test 1 is only 20.37 .
That is why the writer and the collaborator considered continuing the second cycle of that action.
b. The result of post-test 2
There is a great revulsion from the result of post-test 2. It showed that there are 37 of 45 students who passed the KKM 65. The
mean score from the students score is 70.84 and the percentage of students who passed the KKM is 82.2 . The improvement from pre
test to post test 2 is 39.56 . The post-test of cycle 2 has fulfilled the target of Classroom Action Research CAR success, that is above
66
75 students could pass the KKM. Automatically, it can be said that the Classroom Action Research CAR is success and the cycle is
stopped Furthermore, the writer covered the result of students’ speaking
improvement and class percentage including the pretest, posttest 1, and posttest 2 into charts as these following:
Figure 4.1 The Average of the Students’ Speaking Improvement
Figure 4.2 The Percentage of the Students’ Speaking Improvement
50 100
Pre test Post test I
Post test II
50 100
Pre test Post test I
Post Test II
Students’ Speaking Average
Students’ Speaking Percentage
67
CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTION
This chapter provides conclusions and suggestion. The conclusion in this study is derived from the data and factual conditions related to the
technique used which are found during this research conducted. The suggestions are presented in two kinds of suggestions; suggestion for English
teacher in teaching speaking, and suggestion for other researcher who want to conduct the study in similar field of study.
A. Conclusion
According to the result of implementing classroom action research in the seventh grade of students’ of SMP YMJ Yayasan Miftahul Jannah
Ciputat, it showed a great improvement that the mean score of students in pre test was 50.76, whereas from post test 1 was 61.1 and from post test 2 are
70.84. Besides, the students’ score percentage in the pretest is 20 , from post test 1 is 42.20 and 82.2 from post test of students who passed the KKM.
Next, the result of the students’ score improvement from pretest to posttest 1 is 20.37 , and from pretest to posttest 2 is 39.56 . So it achieved the
criteria of success. Based on the result of observational notes it showed that the students
enthusiastic, and actively participate in learning speaking by using communication games. Moreover the result of the questionnaire given to the
students after using communication games in teaching speaking showed that
