35
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS
A. Data Description
In the previous chapter, to collect the data the writer used a test which is given to the samples of the research. The test was  oral test form. The students were asked to
work in pair to make a dialogue, comprehend and present the dialogue in front of the class.
Those  are  who  also  included  as  the  samples  of  this  research  were  taken  by purposive  sampling  technique.  Thus,  the  writer  took  40  students  in  Senior  High
School  Darussalam  Ciputat.  The  samples  consisted  of  twenty students  as  the
experimental class form XI IPS 3 and twenty students as the controlled class from XI IPS 4.
The  experimental  class  and  the  controlled  class  were  taught  with  different technique  in  teaching  speaking.  The  experimental  class  was  taught  using  the
information gap activities, whereas the controlled class used conventional technique. In the experimental class, the writer asked every student in that class to share about
her or his information that they have gotten. They must share it to their friends who did not get the information. Then, the oral test score of each group can be seen in the
tables for data analysis as follow:
1. Experimental Class
In the experimental class the writer gave the test. The results of the test as follow:
Table 4.1 Score of the Experimental Class X
Student Pre-Test
Post-Test Gain Score
S1 54
74 20
S2 54
72 18
S3 56
74 18
S4 52
74 22
S5 74
86 12
S6 64
80 16
S7 60
70 10
S8 60
66 6
S9 54
68 14
S10 54
68 14
S11 52
66 14
S12 52
68 16
S13 64
82 18
S14 54
64 10
S15 54
68 14
S16 56
66 10
S17 48
74 26
S18 52
70 18
S19 48
68 20
S20 48
70 22
∑=1110 ∑=1428
∑X=318
Based on the table 4.1, the highest score in experimental class was 86 obtained by one  student  whereas  the  lowest  score  in  experimental  class  was  64  obtained  by  one
student.  The  differences  score  obtained  between  the  highest  score  and  the  lowest
score which showed 12 for the highest score and 10 for the lowest score as the result in the gain score, it can be concluded that there was significant influence in teaching
speaking using information gap activities.
2. Controlled Class
In the controlled class the writer also gave the test. The results of the test as follow:
Table 4.2 Score of the Controlled Class Y
Student Pre-Test
Post-Test Gain Score
S1 54
62 8
S2 46
56 10
S3 52
58 6
S4 54
58 4
S5 54
64 10
S6 52
62 10
S7 68
62 -6
S8 54
64 10
S9 56
66 10
S10 52
62 10
S11 38
56 18
S12 54
54 S13
50 62
12 S14
48 60
12 S15
54 60
6 S16
54 60
6