English Teachers Teachers in General Future Researchers

101 the other words rather than to ask them in the same terminology as Reflective Pedagogy phases, such as changing the word “reflection’ with “questions”. Meanwhile the second conclusion was to summarize the discussion of the second problem, which was to find the extents that the students improved though Reflective Pedagogy implementation. The second conclusion is taken from the data presentation at the students’ writing result. From the data taken from the writing submission of the fifth-grade students Class B of Kanisius Sengkan Elementary School, the researcher found some extents that the students improved during the learning process by implementing reflective pedagogy. The extents were the students’ ideas finding and organization ability and diction, or word choices, and spelling ability. From the research it concluded that the implementation of Reflective Pedagogy phases and writing steps could help the students in finding and organizing ideas as well as finding a good diction and spelling.

B. Suggestions

By experiencing the process of Reflective Pedagogy, the researcher found some many meaningful values. From the data presentation, the findings, and the discussion, the researcher purposed some suggestions to English teachers and also to the future researchers.

1. English Teachers

Since implementing Reflective Pedagogy, which comprised five learning phases, learning context, experience, reflection, action, and evaluation, was PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 102 effective in the writing activities, the researcher recommended for English teachers to apply those phases in their teaching activities. They probably could take not all of the phases in sequence but rather take just some of them depending on the students’ needs. Since offering enjoyable learning activities for students, elementary school students in particular, Reflective Pedagogy is suitable for students in case that a teacher cannot force them to learn but giving them interesting activities.

2. Teachers in General

In the process of conducting this research, the researcher realized that Reflective Pedagogy can be applied for any subjects, levels of learners, and schools, not only limited for Catholic schools and Elementary School students. Therefore, on this occasion, the researcher did recommend to all teachers teaching any subject and any level to apply Reflective Pedagogy in their teaching activities. Reflective pedagogy is completely suitable for all subjects. Providing students context to learn, experience with the topic, reflection on what the students feel, see, and hear, action based on the understanding on the topic, and evaluation could give the student interesting and valuable learning activities. Further, it could help the students learn the topic better and more effectively.

3. Future Researchers

In this research, the researcher combined Reflective Pedagogy phases with the writing process which included brainstorming, drafting, revising, and submitting. It seemed that the activities in each phase were merely from the PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 103 writing process itself. Therefore, here the researcher invited researchers to conduct a research on Reflective Pedagogy implementation in the English writing skills with different writing activities or process. Furthermore, the researcher also invites those who are interested in Reflective Pedagogy to conduct a research on the implementation of Reflective Pedagogy in a different skill and level. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 104 REFERENCES Aqid, Z. 2007. Penelitian Tindak Kelas: untuk Guru. Bandung: Yama Widya. Aries, E. F. S. 2008. Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Deskripsi Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Islam Sabilillah Malang melalui Strategi Roulette Writing. Retrieved October 16,2010, from http:www.iched.orgcmsscripts . Cohen, L., Lawrence M., and Keith M. Eds.. 2000. Research Method in Education. London: RoutedgeFalmer. Corbetta, P. 2003. Social Research Theory, Methods and Techniques. London: SAGE Publications. Drost, J. 2001. Ignatian Pedagogy: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: T.P Heaton, J. B. 1975. Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman Group Limited. Hopkins, D. 1985. A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. Milton Keyness: Open University Press. Jacobs, G.M., Power, M.A., Loh, W.I. 2002. The Teacher’s Sourcebook for Cooperative Learning: Practical Techniques, Basic Principles, and Frequently Asked Questions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. 1986. Circles of Learning: Cooperative Learning. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company. Kepner. C. H. and Benjamin B. T. 1976. The Rationale Manager. New Jersey: Kepner-Tregoe, IMC. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 105 Kvale, D. 1996. Interviews. London: SAGE Publications. Nunan, D. 1999. Second Language Teaching-Learning. Boston, USA: Heinle Heinle Publisher. Tribble, C. 1996. Writing. London: Oxford University Press. Watson, J. 1996. Reflection through Interaction: the Classroom Experience of Pupils with Learning Difficulties. London: The Falmer Press. Zuber-Sherritt, O. 1996. New Direction in Action Research. London: Falmer. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 106 APPENDICES PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 107 APPENDIX A Research Permission Letter from PBI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 108 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 109 APPENDIX B Competence Standard and Basic Competence of English Lesson for Fifth-Grade Elementary School Semester II PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 110 Standar Kompetensi Kompetensi Dasar Menulis 8. Mengeja dan menyalin kalimat sangat sederhana dalam konteks sekolah 8.1 Mengeja kalimat sangat sederhana secara tepat dan berterima 8.2 Menyalin dan menulis kalimat sangat sederhana secara tepat dan berterima dengan tanda baca yang tepat Competence Standard Basic Competence Writing 8. Spelling and copying very simple sentences in a school context 8.1. Spelling very simple sentences accurately and acceptably. 8.2. Copying and writing very simple sentences accurately and acceptably with correct punctuations PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 111 APPENDIX C Research Instruments PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 112

1. WORKSHEET