The Place of Social Wrong

96 society. The verbal process of said indicates the reported speech of Erwin. The material process of had made and resulted is categorized involving past tense. It means that the specific actions are affected by particular Actor SDA. The propaganda ac tion of SDA as the corruptor employs the Goal ‗the weakened position of the KPK‘ and the Attribute ‗multiple attacks‘. On the other hand, the relational process is indicated by withstood which means the strong resistance of opposition to several KPK bad lucks OALD 8. In sentence 47, the quoted speech of Erwin can be a consideration to represent that there is a conspiracy between SDA and police officers against KPK. The relational identifying process of was indicated that ‗his decision to skip the questioning session ‘ is the identified and ‗an attempt‘ is the identifier. The material process of result shows consequences of the specific cause OALD 8. ‗In promoting the criminalization of the KPK‘ is considered to be the main problem and is used to fight against KPK. Modal could determine the possibility of the negative effect that causes KPK in the total paralysis. In conclusion, TJP intends to state that Erwin as a representation of society is opposed to SDA and National Police fighting against KPK. The third is Miko Susanto Gintin g‘s proposition from the Center of Indonesian Legal and Policies Studies PSHKI. He criticizes SDA legal move through a pretrial mechanism challenging his suspect status and still gives support to KPK. This quotation can be a consideration for the researcher to criticize. Commonly, corruption cases win at the court level and KPK suffers the lost. The example is below: 48. Miko Susanto Ginting from the Center of Indonesian Legal and Policies Studies PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 97 PSHKI said he hoped that the court would reject Suryadharma‘s proposal and urged the KPK to continue its investigation regardless of the ex ministers move. 48, XIV, C 49. ―Every ruling has its own context so the court‘s decision approving Budi ‘s pretrial ruling does not mean the court will do the same on Suryadharma. That is not how the law works. A ruling is not a law but only a reference that cannot be blindly applied to other cases. ‖ Miko said. 53, XV, C In sentence 48, Miko Susanto Ginting from the Center of Indonesian Legal and Policies Studies PSHKI is indicated as Unmarked Interpersonal Theme. It is interesting while mental process hoped and reject can indicate Miko‘s desiderative representation. Modal would indicate inclination, a tendency to feel or to act related to SDA pretrial proposal OALD 8. The verbal process of said and urged to continue indicates Miko‘s verbiage about ‗investigation‘. On the other hand, in the sentence 49, the relational process has indicated as possessive ones. The possessor is ‗every ruling‘ and the possessed is ‗its own context. Law within the court, however, is the highest and more powerful body. The relational process of does not mean shows the carrier ‗Budi‘s pretrial ruling‘ construes the Attribute ‗the court will do the same on Suryadharma ‘. Modal will emerges indicating inclination, a court‘s tendency to feel or to act related to the SDA pretrial case OALD 8. Otherwise, modal can indicates the possibility of an action in the ruling . Negative polarity ‗not‘ emerges three times. The researcher concludes this negation represents Miko‘s attitude toward the case. Comment Adjunct ‗blindly‘ indicates Miko‘s subjectivity. These two sentences above can use as the representation of society against corruption. Many people, for instance, Miko Susanto, disagree to common practice proposing pretrial. Pretrial hearing done by the Judge does not examine the main content but do justice for those breaking the law or not. The prima facie PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI