97
PSHKI said he hoped that the court
would
reject
Suryadharma‘s proposal and
urged the KPK to continue its investigation regardless of the ex ministers move. 48, XIV, C
49.
―Every ruling has its own context so the court‘s decision approving
Budi
‘s pretrial ruling does
not
mean the court
will
do the same on Suryadharma. That is
not
how the law works. A ruling is
not
a law but
only a reference that
cannot
be
blindly
applied to other cases.
‖ Miko
said. 53, XV, C
In sentence 48, Miko Susanto Ginting from the Center of Indonesian Legal and Policies Studies PSHKI is indicated as Unmarked Interpersonal Theme. It is
interesting while mental process hoped and reject
can indicate Miko‘s desiderative representation. Modal
would
indicate inclination, a tendency to feel or to act related
to SDA pretrial proposal OALD 8. The verbal process of said and urged to continue
indicates Miko‘s verbiage about ‗investigation‘.
On the other hand, in the sentence 49, the relational process has indicated as
possessive ones. The possessor is ‗every ruling‘ and the possessed is ‗its own context. Law within the court, however, is the highest and more powerful body.
The relational process of does not mean
shows the carrier ‗Budi‘s pretrial ruling‘ construes the Attribute ‗the court
will
do the same on Suryadharma
‘. Modal
will
emerges indicating inclination, a court‘s tendency to feel or to act related to the SDA pretrial case OALD 8. Otherwise, modal
can
indicates the possibility of an action in the ruling
. Negative polarity ‗not‘ emerges three times. The researcher concludes this negation represents Miko‘s attitude toward the case. Comment
Adjunct ‗blindly‘ indicates Miko‘s subjectivity. These two sentences above can use as the representation of society against
corruption. Many people, for instance, Miko Susanto, disagree to common practice proposing pretrial. Pretrial hearing done by the Judge does not examine
the main content but do justice for those breaking the law or not. The prima facie PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
98
would occur in this domain; to justify the truth if SDA and his lawyer proved the substantial contradictory evidence. However, the court decision remains inviolate
and every person has to obey the law. KPK as the legitimate body has the authorization to drag the corruptor into the prison by conducting examinations
and investigations. It is important to be noted in this issue that KPK ‘s move can
be stopped in the prosecutions at the court against those commit to corrupt acts. This miserable condition, at least, indicates how defendants employ various
objections inside andor outside the trial. The fourth proposition is stated by Benny Kabur Harman, as the
delegation of Democratic Party commenting anti-corruption movement toward Sutan Bathoegana SB. Dems attitude towards SB, its political leader in
Commission VII is surprisingly irony because the case is involving many politicians in the Representative. Anti-corruption discourse starts dominating when KPK
can detain the Representative member. TJP performs the social control reconstructing KPK. Here is the example:
50.
Democratic Party central board member Benny Kabur Harman said the party had anticipated that the Corruption Eradication Commission
KPK
would
move to arrest senior Dems politician Sutan Bhatoegana.
3, I, F 51.
―He has long been named a suspect and he was arrested yesterday.
It
‘s how the mechanism works; we‘re not surprised. We anticipated
the arrest,
‖ Benny told reporters on Tuesday. 5, II, F
In sentence 50, ‗Democratic Party central board member‘ indicated as Marked
Interpersonal Theme refers to Benny Kabur Harman. The verbal process of said
conveys ideas about Dems perspective toward SB case. The relational
identifying process of had anticipated reflects the expectation of the identifier
‗the party‘. The Corruption Eradication Commission KPK is the Actor in the PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
99
material process move to arrest
which affects the Goal ‗senior Dems politician Sutan Bhatoegana
‘. In sentence 51, the passive voice in the beginning of the clause reflects
Indonesian style of English and the effect is the absence of subject KPK. The grammatical metaphor of
―It‘s how the mechanism works‖ is indicated as a relational attributive process. Non-referential
it
then indicates the later sentence
about happening of the arrest. The verb
‗anticipate‘ refer to take an action before it can be done by someone else OALD8. The agents in this proposition
are personal pronouns ‗he‘ and ‗we‘. The usage of third personal pronoun
‗he‘ refers to the agent in the verbal process while the usage of first personal pronoun
‗we‘ is the agent in the material process. It is considered to be a possible way that there are the representations of anti-corruption movement
and establish rhetorically the reality of change. Hence, the vocabulary choice interestingly can be understood as
Democratic Party indifference to its senior politician. Found in the same text, Dems do not want to be involved in the case even though in the social reality: the
possibility for a party ‘s representative in the parliament which leads in the
governmental position should contribute for party sustainability. Here is the example, responding
Benny Kabur Harman‘s proposition: 52.
―We are stepping up our efforts to unravel the roles of other parties in
the case, ‖ Johan said. 63, XVII, E
In sentence 52, the material process is indicated by phrasal verb ‗step up‘ and its
expansion ‗to unravel‘ which means increasing KPK intensity of investigating and examining other on-
going cases OALD 8. The Actor ‗we‘ refers to KPK as the anti-
graft institution. The Goal ‗our efforts‘ is affected by the Actor, on the PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
100
other hand , the Scope ‗the roles of other parties‘ is not affected by the Actor. The
verbal process of said indicates that the Sayer is Johan Budi, KPK deputy for
prevention. His uttered words aim to convey KPK‘s intention for next working plan. In this part of analysis, at least, the researcher can identify how to
overcome the obstacles so that the social order need a change for better condition eradicating corruption.
4.5 Critical Reflection
In this part of analysis, the reflection emerges how the Commission Eradication Corruption KPK should be. Within several movements to eradicate
corruption, the representations of corruption itself need to critically explain that the application of anti-corruption education is necessary. The structure of
academic life is suitable to educate Indonesians what corruption and its criteria are. By getting into the curriculum of schools and organizing seminars and
lectures in the universities, the campaigns of anti-corruption issues are effectively and efficiently delivered. Hence, the educational institution is a
suitable umbrella to overcome discrimination and inequality. The existence of KPK then remains unchanged.
KPK is not a super body with powerful authority if corruptors exist and occupy the leader positions in its body. The initiative of the supervisory institution
over KPK, in hope, could bring justice so that the possibility of corruptor inversion in the body of governments would be eliminated. Eradicating corruption
is not merely a case of ≥ one billion grand corruption and involving
government. It is possible to handle the cases ≤ one billion petty corruption and
involving private companies so that the term of ‗corruption‘ itself might be
101
controlled and
disappeared ICW
in Koran
Tempo retrieved
on www.antikorupsi.org
on August 31st 2016. The term of corruption should be defined clearly within contexts. Since media
like
The Jakarta Post TJP
holds the legitimization to conduct news and to share information both nationally and internationally, it is great opportunity to claim that
media‘s role to construct perception through language use can educate the readers about several related terminologies to corruption concepts, such as bribe, graft,
collusion, and nepotism. TJP‟s power and domination influence its readers
continually and unconsciously. Its ideologies produce hegemony and the reproduction of ideologies can give a meaning to the social reality that social actions are formed by
media. In conclusion, the more suitable and effective solution to control social cognition is through the society agreement about corruption ideologies rather than the
coercive and force actions. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
102
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS
This last chapter provides the conclusion related to the findings in analysis and the suggestion for future researchers. The following parts briefly show, first,
the summary of these research findings and, second, the suggestion for the next researcher of the same topic especially in relation to the corruption discourse in
Indonesia.
5.1 Conclusions
In general, the critical discourse analysis in this study produces two statements based on the research problems. The first is social wrongs that
The Jakarta Post TJP
intends to reveal in relation to corruption. There are two social wrongs found in the TJP‘s texts: depoliticization of democracy and
politicization of media. Depoliticization of democracy refers to both unbalanced and unfair relation of power between common people society
and the government in the case of political domination, and the involvement of great politicians in the state bureaucracy ruling the law No. 302002 on
the Corruption Eradication Commission KPK. Otherwise, politicization of media is claimed as the representation of the socio-political situation. There
is a great importance and problem about KPK, based on media perspective. Media legitimate and represent within its language use the involvement of
society to speak publicly the power and domination which are unbalanced PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
103
and unfair. It calls for change and needs socio-cultural context to define who is being oppressed by whom.
The second statement is ideologies that
The Jakarta Post TJP
texts reflect in
Suryadharma Ali‘s and Sutan Bhatoegana‘s corruption case. Systemic Functional Grammar SFG is employed to reveal what happened in the
corruption practices dealing with those two great and influential politicians. Ideologies in online news articles of
TJP
have formed a power relation between the text producer and its reader, an underconscious belief. The marketization of
linguistic is argued to exercise the same representation of the world to the reader about corruption discourse. By applying Discourse Analysis DA and Systemic
Functional Grammar SFG, the ideological effectimplication within the text can be explained and the linguistic evidence can be interpreted so that research aims
can be achieved. From the six online news articles, the researcher found that ideologies
between Suryadharma Ali SDA and Sutan Bathoegana SB corruption cases are quite different. The different ideologies emerge in the term of transitivity analysis.
There are three ideologies of SDA case. The first is limitation of KPK‟s authority.
By employing material and mental processes of transitivity,
TJP
narrated how KPK is powerless to face SDA‘s political tactics avoiding possibilities of
detainment. The second is
unfavorable situation to KPK.
The verbal process can represent the dialogic interactions between two oppositional groups corruptor vs-
anti-graft and identify their political strategy shown in the TJP text. Meanwhile the existential process can prove that a propaganda action happens. The third is
charge denials of KPK
. Relational processes of attributive and identify represent PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
104
the contradiction situation of the corruption objectcorruptors. The relational attributive shows the coruptors‘ factual conditionreality but the relational identify
can explain the opposite, hope and expectation. The researcher found the different reporting SB. The ideologies of SB case
are
a powerful KPK
and limitation of KPK‟s authority. SB is the main object of
TJP
news while KPK is the subject. By employing material and verbal processes,
TJP
narrated how KPK is powerful in investigating and detaining SB. On the other hand, relational process of attributive and identify indicates that KPK seems
failed to prosecute him in the court level. However, the court has higher and greater position deciding the
defendant‘s status guilty or innocent. These
TJP
ideologies of S DA‘s and SB‘s case can briefly show either researcher‘s subjectivity
or an antithesis to support not only the powerless, minor, marginalized andor discriminated group but also to support the powerful group. It means that KPK as
the only institution in detaining corruptors should be more powerful dealing with its authority in Commission Law no 302002.
The implication of ideologies is viewed as reality and constructs an understanding of what social problem is. The depoliticization of democracy is
clearly defined in this section by indicating the involvement of government without a public presence in decision making. An assumption is produced that
Commission Law no 302002 does not work effectively and corruption practices remain still in the KPK body. Moreover, the House of Representatives offers
three points of proposals orders and commands to implement the Draft Revision of Commission Law no 302002 so that this ad-hoc institution cannot be as
possible as the most powerful body in eradicating corruption. The first proposal PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
