5 and 1 are: t. table
�
�
at the significance level of 5 = 2.04 t. table
�
�
at the significance level of 1 = 2.75 Based on the formula above, the result of the statistic calculation indicated
that value of �
�
is 4.01and the value of df degree of freedom was 29 on degree of significance of 5 is 2.04. Comparing the
�
�
with each values of the degree of
significance, the result is 2.04 4.01 2.75.
Since �
�
score in the table is higher than �
�
score obtained from the result of calculating, so the alternative hypothesis
�
is accepted and null hypothesis is rejected.
B. The Analysis affects using Total Physical Respond Method in Learning
the Vocabulary of Experiment Result
From the explanation about the analysis of the result on the tables above, it can be interpreted that teaching vocabulary through TPR method is affective and
quite success than teaching vocabulary without using TPR method. It can be seen from the students’ improvement in learning vocabulary using TPR method and
using GTM. Based on the increasing of the students’ test result after learning the
vocabulary using TPR method in instructional activities, it was proved that the use of TPR method in instructional activities in teaching learning process is important
for student’s achievement. Besides, the students’ motivation increased. Moreover, it can be said that the students’ affect their vocabulary mastery in learning
vocabulary through TPR method; it can also be seen from the activities they followed in the class actively. It was compatible either with the students’ response
when the teaching learning process is going on, they did the teacher ’s commands
perfectly.
44
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SEGGESTIONS
This is the last chapter used to conclude this study. It presents the conclusions and some suggestions.
A. Conclusion
Based on the researcher conducted at MTs Khazanah Kebajikan Pondok Cabe Ilir, it can be concluded that the teaching vocabulary through TPR method
has shown positive significant difference in vocabulary teaching and learning process. It can be seen based on
the students’ post-test scores in learning vocabulary by using TPR method are higher rather than the students’ post-test
scores by using GTM method and it also can be seen as students’ responds of the writer’s commands, they look enjoyable learn vocabulary using vocabulary,
because they can practice directly. Finally, it can be concluded that using TPR method in teaching vocabulary
is quit success; it is really helpful in increasing the students’ ability and achievement in English vocabulary mastery.
B. Suggestions
Based on the conclusion stated previously, it could be given some suggestions as follows:
1. English teacher is expected to use the TPR method as an alternative
technique teaching in teaching vocabulary 2.
With using TPR method, the teacher is expected to be able to reduce stress of the students and make the student enjoyable in teaching vocabulary.
3. To Make sure that TPR method is successfully applied, the time provided
should be enough. 4.
The English teacher should give a command in the target language and perform it with the students several times
5.
The English teacher should give the students the opportunities to be active in learning vocabulary, so the teacher should be more like a students’
partner in teaching learning process.
BIBLIOGRAFHY
Adil, Al-Kufaishi, A vocabulary building program is a necessary not a luxury, English Teaching Forum, Vol XXVI, No.2, April 1988
Aebersold, Jo Ann and Mary Lee Field, From Reader to Reading Teacher, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997
Allen French Virginia, Techniques in Teaching Vocabulary, New York: Oxford University Press, 1983
Ary , Donald, Introduction to Research in Education, USA: Harcourt Brace Publisher, 1996
Bowers, Roger, Applied Linguistic and English Language Teaching, London: Macmillan Publishers, 1991
Brown, H. Douglas, Teaching by Principles-An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 2th Edition, San Fransisco: Longman,2001
Brown, H. Douglas, The Principles of Language Learning and Teaching: Second Edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc,,1987
Cattegno, Caleb, Teaching Foreign Language in School, New York: Educational Solution, 1963
Cellier- Macmillan International: A Division of the Macmillan Company, The Key to English: Vocabulary: English Language Service, London: Collier
Macmillan Limited, 1971
Curtain , Helena Anderson, Carol Ann Pesola, Language and Children making the Match: Foreign Language Instruction in the Elementary School,
Massachusetts, 1988
Finocchiaro, Mary, English as a Second Language from Theory to Practice, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, inc., 1989
Fries, Harles C., Teaching and Learning as A Foreign Language, Ann Arbor, the University of Michigan Press, 1995
Hatch Evelyn and Cheryl Brown, Vocabulary, Semantic, and Language Education, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997
