performing scenario acting from time to time and the impact toward the process of teaching and learning activities in the classroom.
4. Reflecting
This is the last phase in Kurt Lewin’s cycle in which the teacher and the writer discuss about the implementation and data they gathered. If the problem
is unfinished in the first cycle or still might have found some problems, so they should plan again a second cycle with the same concept as the first one; re-
planning, re-acting, re-observing.
H. The Result of Action Intervention
The successful in using Transformation Drill are divided into several categories; first, by using Transformation Drill expected develop students’
understanding in learning verb I present tense and verb II past tense, reduce their stress and create a positive mood in teaching learning process. Second, it can develop
students’ ability in using verb I present tense and verb II past tense. Third, it can improve students’ score in pre-test up to post-test. Finally, they can pass of the
Minimum Mastery Criterion Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM is sixty 60.
I. The data and Source of the Data 1. Data
Data to this study were about the observation of the data and the research of the data. Observation of the data is the data which is used to
control acting that was in planning and the result. Meanwhile, the researcher of the data is about the students’ ability in using verb I present tense and
verb II past tense.
2. Source of the Data
Source of data in this study was the VII. 6 grade students of SMPN 238 Jakarta, academic year 2010 2011. They consist of 36 students, 15 boys
and 21 girls.
J. The Instrument of Data Collection
The instrument of data collection that is used by researcher are; first is test. Test was used to know the students’ achievement in understanding verb I present
tense and verb II past tense, the teacher gave 3 tests, they are pre-test, post-test 1 after first cycle and post-test 2 after second cycle. The items were consisted of 15
items multiple choice, and 10 items fill in the blank. Second, observation, it was conducted before and after implementation of Classroom Action Research CAR. In
doing the observation, the researcher prepared structured form of observation each of cycle, and the observer gave the score by choosing “yes or no”. if choose “yes” so the
score is one 1. To know the percentage result the observation, the researcher used the formula:
The result of percentage : items number X 100
Maximum score
Third, interview, it was conducted before and after implementation of CAR. The interview that was conducted before implementation of CAR is to know the
problem in teaching grammar and the students’ difficulties in learning grammar. And the interview that was conducted after implementation of CAR is to know the success
of using Transformation Drill, the teacher opinion about the general English class during CAR, the difficulty of teacher in CAR and the teacher overcomes the problems
and difficulties in using transformation drill in CAR. Finally, field note, it was used to observe and to know activities of teacher and students in teaching learning process.
They are about the class situation and students’ participation.
K. The Technique of Collecting Data
Techniques of collecting data in this research are using qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative is derived from observation within the physical activity
in the classroom and interview to be presented for the teacher. On the other side, the quantitative data in this research uses questionnaire and test in which the test consists
of pre-test and post-test. Here are the explanations:
