Pre-design Study Post-design Study

48

E. Data Analysis Technique

This section will elaborate the technique to analyze the obtained data in this study. In this study, the data were obtained from the interview and the questionnaire.

1. Pre-design Study

For the pre-design study, firstly, the writer analyzed the results of the preliminary study; that is, the interview results with two English teachers of Language Department of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta. The interview results were analyzed descriptively. After conducting the preliminary study, the writer distributed the questionnaire for the diagnosis of needs. The data from the 26 eleventh grade students of Language Department of SMA BOPKRI 2 Yogyakarta were analyzed by calculating the percentage of each item from the questionnaire. It was presented in the form of table attached in the Appendix C. The data presented the participants’ statements about the listening activity in class, difficulties in listening, interests and needs for listening activity.

2. Post-design Study

In the post-design study the writer analyzed the descriptive statistic data about the participants’ statements. For the closed form questionnaire, the judgment of the participants’ statements uses five points of agreement: 1 : strongly disagree with the statement 2 : disagree with the statement 3 : undecided with the statement PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 49 4 : agree with the statement 5 : strongly agree with the statement The writer used central tendency, which is regarded as the proper way to conclude the data since it represents the whole set of measurements. Central tendency is measured using mean, median, and mode. The table of the central tendency is presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 The Blueprint of Participants’ Opinions on the Designed Materials Central Tendency No Participants’ Opinion on N Mn Mdn Md Note: N : Number of respondents Mn : Mean the average score of the sources set Mdn : Median middle point occurring in the sources set Md : Mode the score that occurs most frequently in the set of sources The Mean was counted using the calculation below: X = Σ X N Note: X : the range point Σ X : the sum of all scores N : the number of respondents The mean as the result of the calculation above is determined whether it is acceptable or not based on the criteria on Table 3.3. 50 Table 3.3 The Criteria of The Mean of the Evaluation Analysis Results Mean The Criteria 1.00 – 1.99 Replace the rejected part of the design 2.00 – 2.99 Add more or modify part of the design based on the lack on the statements 3.00 – 3.99 Conduct more exploitation on the existing part of the design based on the statements 4.00 – 4.99 No revision on the content but revise some part of the design based on the suggestions on the statements 5.00 No revision For the open form questionnaire, the participants gave comments, evaluation, and suggestions on the designed materials. Furthermore, the results were used as the basis for improving and revising the designed materials into the final version.

F. Research Procedure