Data Presentation and Analysis
Table 2: Degree of Agreement
Degree of Agreement Meaning
1 Strongly Disagree
2 Disagree
3 Doubt
4 Agree
5 Strongly Agree
The descriptive statistics of the participants’ opinions toward the designed materials were presented as follows:
Table 9: The Descriptive Statistics of Participants’ Opinions
Frequency of the Degree of
Agreement Central Tendency
No. Participant’s Opinion on ...
1 2
3 4
5 N
Mn Mdn
Md
1. The
major goals
of the
designed materials are well formulated.
7 7
4 4
4
2. The designed materials are
able to meet the goals and objectives
stated in
the Curriculum at the School
Level KTSP. 1
6 7
3.8 4
4
3. Generally, the contents of the
designed materials are well- elaborated.
7 7
4 4
4
4. The designed materials are
relevant to
the students’
knowledge and skills level. 7
7 4
4 4
5. The level of difficulty of the
designed materials
is appropriate with what should
be given to the students. 1
6 7
3.8 4
4
6. The tasks or activities in
each unit are relevant to the topic in each unit.
2 5
7 3.7
4 4
7. The tasks or activities in
each unit are well-elaborated and can facilitate the students
2 5
7 3.7
4 4
to achieve the goals and objectives.
8. The instruction in each task
or activity in each unit is clear
enough to
be understood by the students.
1 6
7 3.8
4 4
9. The tasks or activities are
interesting and
various enough to motivate students
to be more active. 1
6 7
3.8 4
4
10. The tasks and activities given
can help the students to understand the lesson taught.
2 5
7 3.7
4 4
11. Generally,
the pictures
provided can
help the
students to understand the lesson more.
7 7
4 4
4
12. Generally,
the designed
materials will
enable the
students to master both oral and written English.
3 4
7 3.6
4 4
Note:
N : Number of participants
Mn : Mean
Mdn : Median
Md : Mode
The result of the descriptive statistics indicated that the average degree of agreement on the evaluation of the materials was 3.8 from 3.6 up to 4. From this
result, it could be concluded that the designed materials are acceptable and appropriate to be used in the school. However, the materials were still needed to be
revised and improved as suggested by the participants of Preliminary Field Testing. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
The participants also gave comments, opinions, suggestions and criticism about the designed materials. The participants’ comments or opinions based on the
questionnaire were described as follows: 1. Generally, the materials were well-designed, well-formulated, and well-
elaborated. 2. The pictures in the materials were interesting and could attract the students’
attention to the materials. Besides, the pictures could help the teacher to make the students understand the material and activities easily.
3. The materials were appropriate for the students of SMKN 5 Yogyakarta. The participants’ suggestions or criticism were described as follows:
1. It would be better to add more written exercises in order to balance between oral and written activities.
2. For the evaluation, it would be better to add questions in the form of multiple choice and cutting-dialogue.
3. In chapter 2, it was suggested to give examples and exercises about describing things, not only describing people.
4. For the syllabus and lesson plans, they needed to be revised since the indicators in the syllabus and lesson plans were still not clear. It should use measurable
verbs. 5. Some pictures in the designed materials were not well laid out.
6. It should add more ESP materials and terms related to the applied-fine art department.