The Technique of Data Analysis

25

CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the research findings based on the analysis of data collected from the implementation of TPR to teaching Preposition of Place. The research findings are described in three parts: data description, data analyzing and data interpretation.

A. Data Description

1. Before Implementing the Action

a. The Result of Pre Interview

Pre Interview was conducted in this study was the unstructured interview. It was held on Thursday, 18 th September 2012. The writer ask the teacher some questions, including: The general condition in English class primarily on students performance and students achievement, the difficulty faced by students in understanding preposition of place and the teacher strategy to solve the students difficulties in understanding preposition of place. First category discussed about the general condition in English class primarily on students’ grammar achievement of the test and students’ activities. The teacher said that most of students who did not like English class; they gained low competence in English. Besides, they still faced obstacle in following the English lesson. They thought English as a complicated then considered that grammar as the most difficult one in learning English primarily on VII class which derived the lowest score of grammar test among the other second grade classes. Moreover, the teacher stated that most of them were hardly to pass the Criterion of Minimum Completeness KKM concerning the school policy. The second category discussed abou t the students’ difficulties in understanding preposition of place. It was related to the students’ difficulties in understanding the formula of the sentence and remembering the pattern. The teacher said students usually forgot about the usage of preposition of place. The third category was related to the strategy used by the teacher to solve students’ difficulties in understanding preposition of place. The teacher said he usually gave a brief explanation and focused on students’ who really have difficulties in understanding preposition of place. He also gave some exercises from the students’ hand book LKS or English text book, and some time he took the material from internet. Unfortunately, it did not really solve the problem. Then, the writer suggested using TPR method to solve the problem. Besides, through TPR method, hopefully students are able to understand Preposition of Place easily. Finally, the teacher and the writer agreed to use TPR Method in teaching Preposition of Place.

b. The Result of Pre Observation

The result pre observation was conducted to know the process of teaching and learning preposition of place before implementing TPR. It was conducted at first year students of MTs. Soebono Mantofani Jombang, Ciputat. The class consists of twenty 20 students. In the class, the teacher used teacher-centered during the activity because the teacher actually dominated the classroom activity then it made the student passive in the class and less motivation to learn preposition of place. Generally, the teacher wrote the material preposition of place then the students wrote after his. Afterwards, if they did not know about the material, the student could ask to the teacher. This activity made the students bored in English class because the teacher center method of teaching activity.

c. The Result of Pre Questionnaire

The researcher delivered the questionnaire to the students in two sessions; before implementation of the action and after the implementation the action. The questionnaire consists of fifth teen 15 statements the questionnaire covers three categories; the students’ response in learning grammar question number 1- 6, the second category was the students’ understanding on preposition of place question number 7- 12, an d students’ activity in teaching learning process question number 13- 15. To find out students’ response and experience about the ideas of learning preposition of place before implementing the action, the writer used the following formula. P = the percentage f = frequency of the percentage is being calculated N = number of students The detail percentage of the students’ response before the implementing of TPR is presented into a table as following: Table4.1 The Result of Pre Questionnaire No Students’ Answer The Result of Student’s Answer Yes No 1 Students feel satisfied with their English score. 5 25 15 75 2 Students like to learn English grammar. 16 80 4 20 3 English is an important lesson 17 85 3 15

Dokumen yang terkait

Teaching preposition of place through contextual teaching and learning (an experimental study at the fifth grade of SDN Pondok Cabe Ilir III Pondok Cabe, Tangerang Selatan)

0 5 75

TEACHING PREPOSITION OF PLACE USING LEGO TO THE FIFTH GRADE OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

0 9 110

The Effectiveness of Total Physical Response Method on students ability in using prepositions of place

0 4 89

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE AT The Implementation Of Teaching English Vocabulary Using Total Physical Response At The Fifth Grade Of Sdn 2 Bonagung In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 13

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE AT The Implementation Of Teaching English Vocabulary Using Total Physical Response At The Fifth Grade Of Sdn 2 Bonagung In 2014/2015 Academic Year.

0 2 13

TEACHING ENGLISH PREPOSITION USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE IN THE FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SD N 01 KENDALSARI PETARUKAN PEMALANG IN 2009/2010 ACADEMIC YEARS.

0 1 6

TEACHING ENGLISH TO THE STUDENTS OF KINDERGARTEN USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR).

0 0 5

The Implementation of the total physical response technique in teaching english vocabulary to the fourth grade of the elementary school.

0 0 128

THE USE OF TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD IN ENGLISH PREPOSITION TEACHING (to the fifth grade students of the academic year 2006/ 2007 SDN Tajuk I Getasan Kab. Semarang).

0 2 63

THE ENGLISH PREPOSITION MASTERY OF THE FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SDN 2 KARANGANYAR DEMAK IN ACADEMIC YEAR 20122013 TAUGHT BY TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE

0 0 16