38
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Based on the result of the analysis in the previous chapter, the writer concludes that:
1. The students’ progress during the teaching and learning activity by using
Total Physical response TPR is better. The main factors affecting this success are the students’ interest in teaching and learning activities given
using TPR, and the students’ achievement in learning preposition of place by
Total Physical response TPR has a significant improvement. It can be seen in the result of students’ score in pre-test and post-test I in the first cycle and
post-test II in the second cycle. 2.
Furthermore, the improvements of students’ understanding of prepositions of place can be seen clearly in the improvement of their achievement in pretest
and posttest. The result of pretest and posttest showed the significant improvement.
3. The data gained from the pretest, the post test in cycle 1 and posttest in cycle
2. Mean score of pretest before cycle 1 is 53,2; mean score of posttest in cycle 1 is 61,5 and mean score in posttest in cycle 2 is 71. It means that in cycle 2
Classroom Action Research CAR, there are 16 students of 20 who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- KriteriaKetuntasan Minimal KKM and
only 4 students are still bellow the KKM. The writer conclude that Total Physical Response Method can improve students ability in using preposition
of place.
B. Suggestion
Based on the conclusion above, the writer would like to offer the suggestion. The suggestion is;
Using Total Physical response TPR in teaching preposition of place is
recommended for English teacher, because by using Total Physical response not only makes students enjoy, fun and relax in learning English but also take
longer in their mind in memorizing the vocabularies, because they response the command by their physical.
Kategori