The result of Post-test II

2. The Data of Questionnaire

The data from the questionnaire gained that after using Total Physical response in teaching Preposition of Place, the students gave positive responses. According to the students total Physical Response made them active in learning preposition of place, effective for preposition of place material and easy to learn preposition of place. Total Physical Response could make classroom more interesting in teaching and learning process of preposition of place.

3. The Data of Test

The data showed that the students’ mean score of posttest I in cycle I was 61.5. It proves that there are some improvements from the pretest mean score. It could be seen from the pretest mean score 53.2 to the mean score of posttest I 61.5. It improves 8.4 61.5-53.2 Next, the class percentage cycle II was 80. It means that in cycle II there were 16 students who passed the KKM and there were 4 students were below the KKM. The class percentage of posttest II obviously shows some improvements from the previous test.

C. Findings after Implementing the Classroom Action research

a. Result of Post Interview

After implementing total physical response method, the writer carried out the interview with the teacher. The writer want to know the teacher opinion about total physical response method in teaching learning preposition of place. In this case, the writer divided three categories question in the interview. There were the students’ condition in teaching preposition of place in the classroom and teachers’ opinion about total physical response. First category, was students’ condition in teaching preposition of place in classroom, the teacher said that the students’ condition was good, enthusiastic in getting material and had motivation for speaking English. Next, the students’ participant was good enough in learning preposition of place. Finally, the students more happy and active in learning preposition of place, they were not bored. Second category was the method was use in the classroom. The difficulties that faced by the students when the writer used total physical response in learning preposition of place was the class management uncontrolled and solve this problem, see the students and repeat the instruction which has deliver by the writer in teaching and learning process. Next, the total physical response method can improve the students’ ability in learning preposition of place. The last, the teacher ever implemented the total physical response method and she has motivation to use it in the classroom activities. The last category is the teachers’ opinion about total physical response. Teacher said total physical response was effective in learning preposition of place. The method can improve the students’ ability in using preposition of place. The teachers’ suggestion as a teacher we have to use total physical response in teaching and learning preposition of place.

b. The Result of Post Questionnaire

The post questionnaire was conducted to know about the students’ response after learning preposition of place through total physical response. The questionnaire used in the research was open questionnaire. The questionnaires were given to the seventh grade students of MTs. Soebono Mantofani Jombang, Ciputat on October 2012. The questionnaire has ten questions. 38

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion

Based on the result of the analysis in the previous chapter, the writer concludes that: 1. The students’ progress during the teaching and learning activity by using Total Physical response TPR is better. The main factors affecting this success are the students’ interest in teaching and learning activities given using TPR, and the students’ achievement in learning preposition of place by Total Physical response TPR has a significant improvement. It can be seen in the result of students’ score in pre-test and post-test I in the first cycle and post-test II in the second cycle. 2. Furthermore, the improvements of students’ understanding of prepositions of place can be seen clearly in the improvement of their achievement in pretest and posttest. The result of pretest and posttest showed the significant improvement. 3. The data gained from the pretest, the post test in cycle 1 and posttest in cycle 2. Mean score of pretest before cycle 1 is 53,2; mean score of posttest in cycle 1 is 61,5 and mean score in posttest in cycle 2 is 71. It means that in cycle 2 Classroom Action Research CAR, there are 16 students of 20 who passed the Minimum Mastery Criterion- KriteriaKetuntasan Minimal KKM and only 4 students are still bellow the KKM. The writer conclude that Total Physical Response Method can improve students ability in using preposition of place.