ExocentricBahuvrihi Compounds Headless Compounds

15

2.1.2.1.2 Left-headed Compounds

As the name implies, left-headed compounds are those whose heads are in the left-hand element of the compound. Like the right-hand head rule, these compounds are also referred to as endocentric compounds because the head is inside the compound Plag, 2003; Nida, 1949. It is mentioned earlier that an inflectional affix is attached in the head component as mentioned by Katamba 1993 that “the genuine generalisation which we should attempt to capture is that inflectional affixes are normally attached to the head, regardless of whether it is on the left or on the right o f a compound” p.319. Thus, the affix or in this case, a plural morpheme is inflected in the left element, as seen in the list below Quirk and Greenbaum, 1973, p.84. singular plural passer-by passers-by passer-bys notary public notaries public notary publics grant-in-aid grants-in-aid grant-in-aids coat of mail coats of mail coat of mails mother-in-law mothers-in-law mother-in-laws

2.1.2.2 Headless Compounds

There are two categories of headless compounds, namely exocentricbahuvrihi and copulativedvandva compounds.

2.1.2.2.1 ExocentricBahuvrihi Compounds

Unlike endocentric compounds, the semantic head of exocentric compounds is outside the compounds Plag, 2003. Like what Nida 1949 states that “exocentric constructions are those in which the unit as a whole belongs to a different external distribution class from the nuclear constituent or from both of the immediate constituents” p.94. In line with this statement, Spencer 1991 mentions that “a compound which lacks a head is called exocentric. Such compounds are sometimes called bahuvrihi compounds, a term used by Sanskrit PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 16 grammarians. Examples in English are not common” p.311. Here are the examples: pickpocket redneck loudmouth From a semantic point of view, those compounds are headless because the meaning of the entire compound does not refer to any of the meanings of its constituents. They lack heads, meaning that the head is not determined within the compound, and the meaning of this type of compound is outside the head itself Carstairs McCarthy, 2002 Spencer, 1991. A pickpocket is someone who picks pocket. It does not mean a kind of pocket. A redneck is not a kind of neck but a kind of person, and loudmouth refers to a kind of person as well. They are not related to a kind of neck or mouth. “Many of those that do exist are pred ominantly pejorative terms referring to people” Spencer, 1991, p.311. The compounds normally refer to “someone or something marked by what is expressed in the composite determinant” Marchand 1969, as cited in Szymanek 1989. In other words, the meaning of an exocentric compound is not predictable “so there is a case for listing their meanings in the lexicon” Katamba, 1993, p.320. From a syntactic point of view, however, these compounds are not headless because they are established according to the phrase structure rule in which the compound pickpocket is generated by the rule N  V N, while the compounds redneck and loudmouth are generated by the rule N  A N Katamba, 1993. They basically apply RHR. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 17

2.1.2.2.2 CopulativeDvandva Compounds