69
c. She forgot to explain the goal of the meeting.
d. She did not manage the class well, thus the students make some noise. And
she also let the students to talk out of the topic. The students sometimes did not obey her command.
e. She delivered complicated instruction especially in the role play section. It
made the students confused about what they should do.
f. She also had fair reinforcement to the students. Her verbal reinforcement were
not variety since she only used the word “good” and “ok” for every action from the students.
g. On the questioning skill part, she only used a technique that was directly
mentioning the name of the students.
h. She had a poor set closure since she could not manage the time well. She had
no time to make the review. In the other word she concluded the lesson hastily.
The result of second respondent first teaching practice: The second respondent’s strengths
:
a. In general, she had a good teaching presentation. Her confidence,
pronunciation, appearance, and speaking fluency are very good.
b. She also had a good set induction skill. The warming up activity she delivered
was appropriate with the lesson. Moreover she could encourage the students to think about the lesson learnt.
70
c. Her stimulus variation was in a good order.
d. She also has managed the verbal reinforcement well.
e. She managed the class well.
f. She warned the students who make some noise to pay attention to the class
activities.
The second respondent’s weaknesses :
a. She forgot to mention the goal of the lesson.
b. She could not choose an appropriate material for SMA students.
c. The recording provided was not clear so that the students could not do the
exercise well.
d. She had poor non verbal reinforcement.
e. Her questioning skill only used few techniques.
f. She had poor set closure skill yet she could not manage the time well.
The result of third respondent first teaching practice: The third respondent’s strengths:
a. Her appearance was very good. She pronounced every word and sentence in
correct way. Her material mastery, basic grammar, and speaking fluency was okay.
71
b. She was also good in teacher movement and gesture. She walked around the
class and check whether her students have already understood to the material or not.
c. She also has showed good eye contact to all of the students. Her eye contact
