50 correction on her pronunciation. Formerly, the first respondent had well material
for set induction activity, but she decreased her set induction skill on the second teaching performance. Moreover, she did not explain the goal of the teaching and
learning activities. She also still used long and complicated instruction which could make students confused. It was also clear that she did not produce
reinforcement to the students’ participation. Furthermore, she still needed to design several kinds of questioning technique. In addition, her closing activity
should be strengthened yet she only made review by herself without asking students comprehension about the material taught.
It could be counted that the first respondent has reached 20 of significant improvements. Thus, the first respondent only did a few significant
improvements. She reached 2 improvements from 10 improvements should be done on the second teaching practice.
b. The significant Improvements of the Second Respondent
Number Significant Improvement
Improved Not Improved
1 Material mastery
√
2 Pronunciation
√
3 Time and Class Managemet
√
4 Teaching and learning goal
explanation
√
5 Verbal reinforcement skill
√
6 Probing and guiding
√
7 Closing activity
√
51
Table 8. The Significant Improvements of the Second Respondent The second respondent has already practiced reflective teaching. She has
performed the second teaching better. She has repaired almost all of the mistakes did in the first teaching simulation. The significant teaching skills improvement
was that firstly she designed the material better and improved her pronunciation. Those two things categorized as the general skill of teaching. Secondly, she
improved her set induction skill that she mentioned the teaching and learning goal before entering the main activities. Thirdly, the second respondent improved her
questioning skills that were about her probing and guiding skill. The last skill which got improvement was set closure skill. However, there still one thing which
has not improved was about explaining the goals of the teaching learning activities.
It was assumed that the second respondent had reached 85,7 of improvements on the second teaching practice. It could be argued that the second
respondent has done a large amount of improvements. It was because she could do 6 improvements from 7 improvements should be done.
c. The Significant Improvement of the Third Respondent
Number Significant improvement
Improved Not Improved
1 Confidence
√
2 Time and class management
√
3 Set Induction skill
√
52 Number
Significant improvement Improved
Not Improved 4 Focusing
skill
√
5 Verbal reinforcement skill
√
6 Non verbal reinforcement
skill
√
Table 9. The Significant Improvement of the Third Respondent The third respondent also has done a great job. She had better performance
on the second teaching presentation. Almost all her weaknesses in the first teaching have already improved. In other word she has been success being
reflective practitioner. As shown in the table above, the third respondent improved the general skill of a teacher that was improving confidence by managing her
emotion. She managed the time well and had a good set closure activity. She could give review toward teaching material in the set closure activity. Moreover, she
increased the set induction skill by arranging it in a good order. Next, she also improved her stimulus variation skill in the focusing skill. She arranged the
students to be more serious in following the teaching and learning activity. Furthermore, she improved her reinforcement skill especially for verbal
reinforcement toward students’ participation. For example, she designed some variety verbal reinforcement as appropriate as the students’ participation. One
thing which should get more attention was that she must improve her non verbal reinforcement skill.
It was argued that the third respondent had reached 83.3 significant improvements. Therefore, the fourth respondent has applied reflective teaching
53 well since she could improve 5 significant improvements from 6 significant
improvements should be done.
d. The significant Improvement of the Fourth Respondent
