Karena dengan pembangunan manusia itulah kita akan mempunyai sebuah manusia-manusia yang produktif,
produktivitas kita meningkat. [Because of human development, t we will have productive
human beings, our productivity will increase.] Ground
dan kalau produktivitas kita sudah meningkat, kita akan mempunyai sebuah daya saing
[and if our productivity has increased, we will have a competitiveness]
Warrant
karena produktivitas akan memunculkan sebuah daya saing. [because productivity will bring a competitiveness.]
Backing D2S1J
4.1.1.10 Claim-Ground-Warrant-Backing
Jokowi was asked how he would stop forest damage. Jokowi claimed that one map policy is very important. That is the claim he wanted to bring forward. He had a
reason behind it which is because there have been overlaps of the forest concession. The warrant of this argument is implicit. However, we can infer from the ground
and claim that if there is no one map policy, forest regulation will be unorganized. That implicit warrant is authoritized by a backing. He gave an example of cases
happened in Kalimantan which caused overlaps see backing below. It is classified as backing since it supports ground as well as authoritizing the implicit warrant.
Sekarang ini karena kita tidak mempunyai one map policy, tidak mempunyai kebijakan satu peta sehingga yang terjadi adalah
sebuah tumpang tindih. Hutan lindung diberikan konsesi pertambangan, ada hutan lindung diberikan konsesi untuk
perkebunan. Ada hutan lindung diberi konsesi untuk sebuah produksi. Saya kira kekeliruan-kekeliruan seperti ini
disebabkan karena kita tidak mempunyai satu peta. [Now this is because we do not have one map policy, the policy
does not have a map so that there is an overlap. Protected forests Ground
are granted mining concessions. There is a protected forest with a plantation concession. There is a protected forest with a
production concession. I think mistakes like these are because we do not have one map.]
One map ini sangat penting sekali. [One map is very important.]
Claim
Tidak ada one map policy, regulasi hutan kacau [ There is no one map policy , forest regulation is chaotic]
Implicit warrant
Saya berikan contoh di sebuah provinsi di Kalimantan, saya tidak menyebutkan yang selatan, yang timur, atau yang tengah.
Ada 753 kasus hanya di dalam satu propinsi. Karena apa?
Tumpang tindih antara tambang dan hutan lindung. Antara tambang dan perkebunan, antara perkebunan dan hutan
lindung. Kalau ini tidak segera diselesaikan, hutan kita akan sedikit demi sedikit atau banyak mulai akan digerus untuk
kepentingan-kepentingan yang lain.
[I give an example in a province in Kalimantan, I did not mention the south, the east or the middle. There are 753 cases
only in one province. Because of what? Overlap between mining and protected forests. Between the mines and
plantations, between plantations and forests. If this is not resolved soon, our forests will soon or later begin to be crushed
to the interests of others.] Backing
D5S6J
4.1.1.11 Claim-Rebuttal
