Qualifier-Claim-Ground-Warrant-Rebuttal Jokowi’s Argument Structures .1 Claim-Ground

4.1.1.7 Qualifier-Claim-Ground-Warrant-Rebuttal

In answering Prabowo’s question about how to defend Indonesia’s territorial, Jokowi employed Q-C-G-W-R. He claimed that he wants to prioritize government to government diplomation.Why did he claim that? Because he has 3 diplomation stategies which are jitubi, bitubi and pitupi see ground. He warranted his claim and ground by saying that those ways could solve the problems.Moreover, Jokowi added a rebuttal where he said that if the diplomation does not work, the problem needs to be taken to International Supreme Court see rebuttal of D3S3J. It is classified as rebuttal because it is a condition where the claim is not 100 working for any situation and it also weakens the authority of warrants. In the claim, Jokowi said that he wants to do diplomation, but then if the case has not gone to a clear point, then he said the problem needs to be taken to court which is an exception of claim and weakens the warrant as it is said government to government diplomacy can finish the territorial problem. In fact, Jokowi mentioned reporting the problem to court. Tadi sudah saya sampaikan bahwa ada tiga strategi diplomasi yang akan kita gunakan yaitu GtoG, BtoB dan PtoP [I have informed that there are three diplomatic strategies that we will use which are GtoG , BtoB and PtoP] Ground Oleh sebab itu, kalau ada sebuah benturan, ada dinamika dengan negara yang lain masalah tapal batas tentu saja yang kita utamakan. Yang kita kedepankan yang terlebih dahulu adalah diplomasi pemerintah dengan pemerintah [Therefore, if there is a collision, there are dynamics with other countries, of course we prioritize the state boundary problem. The thing we put forward the first is government to government diplomacy] Qualifier, Claim dengan cara-cara seperti itulah saya kira nanti tapal batas kita, baik yang di darat maupun yang di laut akan bisa kita selesaikan [with those ways, I think the boundary either on the land or sea we can solve] Warrant tetapi kalau yang dimasalahkan ini tidak selesai, tentu saja bisa- masih bisa kita carikan jalan keluar lagi tanpa melalui perang. Selalu saya sampaikan bahwa diplomasi dialog, diplomasi pemerintah dengan pemerintah inilah yang akan terus kita lakukan. Kalau mentok-mentoknya, ya dibawa ke mahkamah internasional untuk diputuskan [but if the problem is not solved. Of course we can- still can find the way out without going through war. I always say diplomatic dialogue, government to government diplomacy are what we will continue to do. If no more way out, we can take to the international court to be decided] Rebuttal D3S3J

4.1.1.8 Claim-Ground-Warrant-Backing