Implications for teaching practice

• students receive more specialised instruction from two sources, which are, fundamentally, the same processes of reading and writing. For literacy programs in cross-cultural traditional societies, these implications mean that • teacher-training courses can be short because all aspects of the two instructional processes do not need to be taught initially to each trainee • less financial outlay is needed than would be necessary for longer training courses when teaching all aspects to all participants • teachers can concentrate on the preparation and instruction of only one area, which allows for more control, greater motivation, and less competition between teachers, and • students have two teachers to whom they relate, which allows for a better understanding of the two areas of emphasis and more control over their own learning. One further implication for teaching practice is evident from a combination of the literature review in Chapter 2—on the importance of the syllable in beginning literacy instruction Adams 1990; and others—and the research results of the two empirical studies in this project. In aspects of the teaching program that address bottom-up strategies, it is recommended that, for phonemically written orthographies, the syllable is the unit from which to begin breaking the code. The syllable seems to be the optimal point from which both learning to read and write words and by extension, sentences, and texts, and learning to manipulate and control phonemes for spelling and reading accuracy can be initiated. In Chapter 2 also, a particular point of discussion centred on the inconclusive evidence regarding a connection between the orthographic regularity of the soundsymbol correspondence and teaching method. This discussion suggests that a pedagogical framework is needed that capitalises on and makes room for the different kinds of orthographic soundsymbol relationships and the relationship between such orthographies and the construction of meaning in text. Evidence from this project suggests that the Multi-Strategy method provides such a framework. It allows for a multiplicity of soundscript relationships to be accommodated productively, regardless of differences in regularity and whatever unit of representation phoneme, morpheme, syllable, or word is required for a specific language. Such a framework seeks to capitalise on the long history of literacy instructional methods practised in industrial societies, in order to allow a range of techniques for literacy acquisition to be accommodated. One area of difficulty for implementation of the method in rural areas, where means of economic gain are minimal, is that finance is needed for two teachers’ salaries instead of one. The attrition rate can be high so a surplus of teachers needs to be trained. There are fewer problems with salaries when a group of teachers work together. When there are two teachers per class, mutual help can be given so that the classes can continue when teachers need to be absent. Training teachers by holistic, “model-do” techniques—which cover the basic structure and application of the lessons similar to the pattern described in Chapter 2 Davis 1991:53—fits the cultural learning pattern the teachers in the Tok Pisin program described as “show and do; look and follow.” In the two studies, training in short courses followed by practical application in the classroom with regular in-service, discussion, and practice as described in Chapter 3 was found to be an acceptable and practical way of training. The type of in-service that developed through the expertise of the supervisor in the Urat program was the “model-do” method of interaction which lessened embarrassment through non- threatening participation. There was focus on each specific lesson in a routine that allowed • each teacher to explain the procedure or demonstrate the way the lesson was presented in the classroom, and • discussion • to highlight the differences and emphasise the preferred way to do each activity • to clarify the main principles, verify the purpose for each activity and thus, teach theory in context after practical experience, and • to encourage the use of innovative ideas that kept the principles intact. As mentioned earlier, the attitude of the teacher was a strategic factor in the practical application of training. Previous training and experience determined the authority over the way the material was presented in some cases, despite demonstrations and encouragement to follow the goals and instructional procedures of the particular program. There was a marked difference between the way that the teachers in each method preferred to work. This research revealed that, in times of insecurity, there was a tendency for the teachers to revert to teaching with well-known strategies learned from previous experience. It was important that enough teacher-training be given to help the trainees master the procedural patterns and gain some understanding of the purpose behind each activity, so that they felt secure in their role as teacher. These studies also revealed that it was more beneficial to help teachers understand theoretical orientation in short in-service courses after periods of practical experience, rather than to hold prolonged courses of training in the initial stages. The nature of the research, with high motivation and pressure to proceed, was such that time was not allowed for a full trial of the materials. This meant that the person chosen as the supervisor was not experienced in teaching practice or in the methods of instruction. It seemed that not having these two prerequisites in place was a potential drawback for the programs and the research. Steps were taken to give the supervisor as much training and experience as possible with the two methods prior to the beginning of the program. It was also decided that this man should take part in the teaching program to give him vital experience for his ongoing supervisory role. One of the parameters for the research was to fit the programs to the particular circumstances of the communities involved, with the community members participating in all decisions. This condition took precedence over aspirations for ideal preparation and follow-up procedures. It is recommended that in setting up a new program steps be taken for full preparation of all aspects of the research methodology chosen see Bhola 1990b, to minimise problems during implementation. In summary, some general guidelines for successful, ongoing literacy follow from this research. These guidelines are strongly supported by the outcomes of the two studies, particularly in respect to Urat, and they point to the following kinds of general principles: • Community members should be involved and should have a sense of control over the program. • The attitude of teachers and, by extension, the attitude of learners should be positive, with those involved understanding something of the purpose behind the teaching patterns so that motivation, progress, and an ongoing sense of accomplishment are fostered. • Adequate time should be allowed for systematic, controlled instruction to bring about learners’ awareness of the phonemegrapheme relationship, through the context of syllables, words, and sentences, and to foster learners’ accountability in the learning process. • Adequate involvement with print, where emphasis is on holistic activities with texts, should be included in the curriculum to ensure meaning-centred acquisition of the reading and writing processes by the learners. • Adequate care should be taken to match activities to the learners with respect to age and status.

6.3.4. Implications for administrators and policy makers

While the special focus has been on the two methods of instruction in this project, there also has been focus on supplementary issues related to the ease, control, and success of implementation of programs within specific cultural contexts. There is evidence that the principles stated by Gudschinsky in Chapter 3, and many of the suggestions for solving problems which are found in her publications, are sound for any pedagogy related to breaking the code into literacy with focus on the elements from a more bottom-up perspective. This research has shown, however, that holistic strategies, taught as a complement to the bottom-up strategies, furnish a complete framework where different styles of learning are introduced and emphasised. This dual emphasis gives opportunity for learners to experience the literacy process in different ways, to choose the strategies that suit them best and to take control of their own learning from the beginning of the process. Ernest Kilalang Vernacular School Coordinator, East New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea has stated the following: In the past, the expatriates came and did the work for us. But they left without showing us how. We want people who will come, work alongside of us and show us how. Then when they leave, we will be able to carry on by ourselves Summer Institute of Linguistics Literacy Section 1990:7. It has been demonstrated in this research that the Multi-Strategy teachers have understood the dual approach, have taken control, and have conducted literacy projects including ongoing classes for adults to gain access to knowledge that is available through print. A dual emphasis, giving learners access to the meaning-centred approach to literacy acquisition, complemented with a script-centred approach to literacy techniques, gives opportunities for maximum learning and the confidence to persevere into fluency. The manner in which some of the communities have encouraged the continuation of classes and trained new teachers who have begun the cycle over again in other communities without expatriate help is something not documented in the literature for other methods in similar circumstances in non-industrial countries. This research, developed in the East Sepik Province of Papua New Guinea, gives insight into the necessary components for a literacy program. In countries where there is much diversity with many multi-lingual and multi-cultural domains, before any uniform literacy effort can become viable, there needs to be an assessment made of the types of literacy teaching already in practice Street 1984. Evaluation of the components of each program through observation and measurement if feasible of the results, the responses of the recipients, and areas of confident control by those involved gives a basis for developing policies. [See Bhola 1990b:276–279 for a summary of the standards for evaluation.] The research presented in this project involves only two programs and is, therefore, limited. Nevertheless, issuing from the comparison of the two methods of instruction, conducted and evaluated in the two different environments, are clear indications of necessary components for a literacy curriculum as shown in Figure 6.3. READING WRITING WORD PARTS letters syllables to UNDERSTAND the NEW WORDS TEXTS sentences to UNDERSTAND the MEANING LETTER FORM AND SPELLING for OTHERS to READ the WORDS CREATIVE TEXTS for OTHERS to READ the MESSAGE Figure 6.3. Necessary components for an initial literacy curriculum Figure 6.3 shows that there are two basic areas of literacy: Reading and Writing. For these two areas to be fully mastered there are two components necessary for each area: • For Reading it is necessary to master reading • the parts of words—either by recognising and combining single letters or syllables—to understand how to read new words, and • of texts connected sentences that make sense with understanding of the meaning. • For Writing it is necessary to master the • skill of writing words accurately with clear letters and correct spelling so that others can read the text, and • process of thinking and writing down thoughts so that others can understand the message. Including instruction in reading and writing with focus on the “script code”—how to read and write accurately—separately but concurrently with focus on the “meaning code”—how to read and write to understand and convey the meaning—as presented in the Multi-Strategy method is an example of helping learners to acquire the necessary components for learning to read and write and to sustain literacy. This research has shown the value of presenting holistic, generative reading and writing consecutively, so that, cognitively, the creative purpose of the literacy task is realised and practised by the learner without being inhibited by the need for accuracy. The research also has shown the value of teaching the more meticulous, mechanical tasks of reading and writing consecutively, so that the learner can concentrate on learning to decipher the words of the text accurately and to spell automatically. This ensures understanding when reading and the ability to convey the message when writing. Any program which has adequate inclusion of the necessary components as stated above, regardless of implementation methodology, has potential for success. There are also a number of other criteria necessary for successful community literacy which have been addressed in the body of this study. The requirements in any local community will differ; Graddol 1994 summarised these points in relation to communities in India: The dominant form of educational discourse which will emerge in a particular community can be expected to be one which satisfies a variety of local cultural requirements. It must establish a proper authority relation between student and teacher; it must package knowledge in forms appropriate for the age and status of the students in that community; it must incorporate a model of learning which