Data Gathering Technique METHODOLOGY

36 Notes: X = Mean Indicators of central tendency of the set of sources X = Raw score Σ = The sum of N = Number of cases scores The number of respondent In the preliminary field testing, the data showed whether the designed materials were good and acceptable or not. The assessment of the mean is classified as follows: 0 – 2 : the designed materials were poorly designed 2.1 – 3 : the designed materials were fairly designed 3.1 – 4 : the designed materials were good, but need revisions 4.1 − 5: the designed materials were well designed and acceptable

G. Research Procedure

In the following section, the writer discusses the procedures of how the study conducted. The writer adopted the research procedure from Educational Research and Development cycle. The steps could be seen as follows: 1. Research and Information Collecting This step could be considered as needs survey. The writer distributed the questionnaire to one group of participants, which was the first grade students at SMK 1 Bantul Yogyakarta. The writer distributed questionnaire to the students to know about what the learning needs at speaking class for the first grade students at SMK 1, Bantul Yogyakarta. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 37 2. Planning In this step, the writer determined goals, general purposes, topics, and learning objectives. The objective of this step was to prepare the important elements to develop form of product which was designing the materials. 3. Developing the Form of Product After the writer did the need analysis by conducting research and information collecting and prepared the important elements, the writer selected the syllabus type and formulated the subject contents in this step. The writer used the result of all the important elements to design the instructional materials. The writer used the research and information collecting and planning step result as the basis for the material development in designing the materials. 4. Preliminary Field Testing The writer distributed the questionnaire to the three teachers at SMK 1 Bantul Yogyakarta to get comments, feedback and suggestion in order to know the evaluation of the design, whether it needed improvement or not. 5. Main Product Revision After the writer conducted the preliminary field testing, the writer used the data result as the basis for revising the instructional materials. In this step the writer added and reduced several parts that were suggested by the post design participants in order to make the designed materials were more appropriate and acceptable for the students. 6. The writer presented the instructional materials Finally, the writer presented the English Instructional Speaking Materials Using Communicative Tasks for the First Grade Students of SMK Kesenian. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI