Discussions The Report of Cycle II

affect their total group score. In the end of the lesson, the groups who performed better would be given a reward. The success of the implementation of cooperative learning could be seen from the mean scores of the students’ score form the pretest to the posttest. The students’ scores had increased after the implementation of cooperative learning. The table below shows the comparison between the pre-test and post-test in general. Table 4.11 : The Comparison between the Pre-Test and Post-Test Results Score Pre-Test Post-Test Mean

62.3 81.2

The table above shows the changes on the students’ score which had significantly increased. The students who just gained 62.3 in the pre- test, managed to increase their score up to 81.2 in the post-test. It indicates that they were successful in making considerable improvement. In conclusion, cooperative learning was proven to be effective to improve the students’ writing ability. The change between the results of pre-test and post-test is presented in this following figure. Figure 4.1 : The Comparison between the Results of Pre-Test and Post-Test Meanwhile, the results of the students’ writing performance during the implementation are also presented to support the finding that cooperative learning could improve the students’ writing ability. The improvement of students’ writing ability performance during the implementation of the actions is presented in this following figure. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 pre-test post-test Improvement Improvement Figure 4.2 : The Mean Scores of the Students’ Performance on the Five Aspects of Writing Skills during the implementation 5 10 15 20 25 30 Pre-Test Progress Test Post-Test Content Organization Vocabulary Language Use Mechanics 103

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS, IMPLICATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

This chapter discusses about the conclusions of the research, implications and suggestions for the English teacher, the institutions of education, and the students, also to the other researchers. The discussions of each section are presented below.

A. Conclusions

This research was carried out to improve the writing ability of XI IPS 1 students at SMAN 1 Seyegan started in March 2014, during the second semester of the academic year of 20132014.This program was successful to improve the students’ writing ability through cooperative learning. The research was implemented in two cycles which were considered effective in improving students’ writing ability in terms of content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. The actions were implemented through cooperative learning strategies such as write-around, praise-question-polish, buzz-group, and three minute review. The researcher carried out the program in two cycles and found it effective to improve the writing ability of XI IPS 1 students at SMAN 1 Seyegan through cooperative learning. First, cooperative learning help students to learn each other before they are engaged in an individual test. Having students working in groups with mixed abilities would affect and help the students to get the ideas and better understandings especially for students