26 scripted role play  to  improve their speaking  ability in Play Performance  class of
English  Language  Education  Study  Program  in  academic  year  20142015  in Sanata Dharma University.
B. Research Setting
The researcher conducted  this  study during semester 20142015  academic year in English Language Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University.
The  research  was  conducted  in  Play  Performance  course,  classes  A  and  B.  The researcher chose those classes because the classes performed the scripted role play
in front of audiences.
C. Research Participants
The  participants  of  this  study  were  the  students  of  English  Language Education  Study  Program  of  Sanata  Dharma  University  who  joined  Play
Performance  class  in  the  academic  year  20142015.  There  were  sixty  six  66 students  in  Play  Performance  class.  However,  there  were  only  sixty  one  61
students who came in the last meeting of Play Performance class. In this research, the participants should answer 36 close-ended questions in the questionnaire that
the researcher provided. The  researcher  distributed  the  questionnaire  and  conducted  the  interview
with the participants. The questionnaire was distributed to sixty one 61 students in  Play  Performance  class.  Then  the  interview  was  conducted  with  thirteen  13
students.  These  thirteen  13  students  were  selected  based  on  the  lecturer’s
27 suggestion. Moreover, they were the artists who performed the scripted role play
on the stage. Actually there were nineteen 19 students to be interviewed but six 6 students were unavailable for some reasons.
D. Research Instruments
In  this  study,  the  researcher  used  two  research  instruments,  namely  a questionnaire and an interview protocol.
1. Questionnaire
According  to  Cohen,  Manion,  and  Morrison  2003  a  questionnaire  is  a widely  used  and  useful  instruments  for  collecting  survey  information,  providing
structured,  often  numerical  data  being  able  to  be  administered  without  the presence  of  the  researcher  and  often  being  comparatively  straightforward  to
analyze p.245. There are two types of questions in the questionnaire. They are open-ended
and  close-ended  questions.  An  open-ended  question  asks  the  participants  to formulate their own question. A close-ended question asks the participants to pick
an  answer  from  the  given  number  of  options.  Leedy  and  Ormrod  2005 emphasize  that  a  close-ended  question  in  the  questionnaire  provides  limited
choices  to  answer  and  uses  simple,  clear,  and  unambiguous  language.  The researcher provided the close-ended questionnaire in order to limit the choices to
answer.
28 In this study, the questionnaire was in the form of Likert scale. Ary et al.
2002 state that Likert scale assesses attitudes toward the topic by presenting a set of statements about the topic and asking respondents to indicate for each whether
they  strongly  agree,  agree,  are  undecided,  disagree,  or  strongly  disagree  p.224. The  researcher  omitted  the  undecided  option  in  order  to  avoid  misunderstanding
because the undecided option did not contribute response in this study. Therefore, the  researcher  used  four  options  to  answer  the  research  problems,  which  were
strongly agree SA, agree A, strongly disagree SD, and disagree D. There were 36 close-ended questions in the questionnaire in this research.
The  questions  were  divided  into  four  parts.  The  first  part  is  about  students’ perception on the implementation of a scripted role play. The second part is about
students’ perception on the impact of a scripted role play. The third part is about students’ perception in performing the scripted role play, and the last part is about
students’ evaluation in performing the scripted role play. The questionnaire could be seen in Appendix C.
2. Interview Protocol
In  this  study,  the  researcher  used  an  interview  protocol.  Ary  et  al.  2002 state  that  an  interview  is
used to  gather data on subjects’ opinions, beliefs, and feelings  about  the  situation  in  their  own  words.  There  are  three  advantages  of
doing interview based on Ary et al. 2002. They are 1 supplying large volumes of  in-
depths  data  rather  quickly,  2  providing  insight  on  participants’ perspectives, the meaning of events for the people involved, information about the