together. The fact shows that Anti-Flag is serious to protest against the issues of nationalism and capitalism and serious in doing the revolution.
5.2 Recommendations
Some recommendations are proposed for the further studies in the similar research type which is Critical Discourse Analysis study. First is related to the
data. The present study restricts the data from a single band; Anti-Flag. The further studies conducting on more band or singers would be interesting and
challenges since there are a lot of punk rock musician who carry another interesting ideology in their lyrics. It is because the writer finds another
fascinating ideology during analyzing the lyrics. It is hope that the studies on the song lyrics at the future will be more systematic.
The second recommendation is related to methodology of the research. The study is restricted merely to the transitivity, modality and pronoun analysis
which means that the study is only about the ideational meanings and the interpersonal meanings. Thus, the writer recommends the analysis on the
thematization. It is an attractive part to be analyzed. At last, the recommendation is to conduct the study with other fields.
Since the present study is interlinked to the politics of capitalism and nationalism, the further researches may use the study on song lyrics by involving other fields
of study. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AZLyrics. Song from A to Z.. n.d.. Retrieved August 2, 2012, from http:. www.azlyrics.comaantiflag.html
Boulding, K. E. 1967 Towards a Theory of Protest: A Review of General Semantics. 24, 49-58.
Brake, Michael. 1985. Comparative Youth Culture: the Sociology of Youth Cultures and Youth Subcultures in America, Britain and Canada.
London: Routledge. Cambridge Advanced Learners’ Dictionary CALD3 3
rd
ed. 2008. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christie, D.J., Wagner, R.V., Winter, D.A. Ed.. 2001. Peace, Conflict and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21
st
Century. New Jersey: Prentice- Hall.
Cross, Ian 2005. Music and Social Being. Journal of Musicology Australia, 28 1, 114-126.
Denisoff, R. Serge. 1972. Sing a Song of Social Significance. Ohio: Bowling Green University Popular Press
Downing, Angela and Locke, Philip 2006. English Grammar: A University Course Second Edition. London: Routledge.
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2
nd
Edition. London: Bloomsbury Fairclough, N 1989. Language and Power. Harlow: Longman Group UK
Limited. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Essex: Longman Group Limited.
Fairclough, N. Wodak, R 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis in T.A van Dijk Ed., Discourse Studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Discourse as
Social Interaction, 2, 258-284. Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysis Discourse. London: Routledge.
Ferdinandi, Dillon 2010. Only Band That Matters: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Punk Rock and Culture. San Luis Obispo:
California Polytechnic State University. Fox, Kathryn J. 1987. Real Punks and Pretenders. The Social Organization of a
Counterculture. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 163, 344- 370.
Gerot, L. Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: GerdStabler.
Goatly, Andrew 2000. Critical Reading and Writing: An Introductory Coursebook. London; Routledge.
Halliday, M. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar Second Edition. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. 2002. On Grammar. Jonathan Webster, Ed. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. Matthiessen, C. M. 2004. An Introduction
to Functional
Grammar. London: Holder Arnold. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Hodge, Bob. 2012. Ideology, Identity, Interaction: Contradictions and Challenges for Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Approaches to
Discourse Analysis across Disciplines. 52, 1-18. Kananovich, Volha. 2014. Pussy Riot vs. Civil Obedience: A Critical Discourse
Analysis of Two Texts. Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 65-81. Jasper, James M. 2010. Social Movement Theory Today: Toward a Theory of
Action? Sociology Compass, 411, 965-976. doi: 10.1111j.1751- 9020.2010.00329.x
Johnson, Dave 2014, March 30. NAFTA at 20: A Vehicle to Increase Profits at the Expense of Democracy. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from website
http:www.truth-out.org Lock, Graham 1996. Functional English Grammar: An Introduction for Second
Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Metrolyrics.
n.d.. Retrieved
August 2,
2012 from
http: www.metrolyrics.comanti-flag-lyrics.html.
Porta, D. Donatella Diani, Mario 2006. Social Movement: An Introduction Second Edition. Malden: Blackwell
Quirk Cort, Mary Elizabeth. 2013. The Power of Lyrical Protest: Examining the Rhetorical Function of Protest Songs in the 2000s. Rochester Institute
of Technology. Taiwo, Rotimi. 2008. Discursive Practices in Nigerian Pentecostal Christian
Songs. California Linguistic Notes, 332. Sharififar, M. Rahimi, E. 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis of Political
Speeches: A Case Study of Obama’s and Rouhani’s Speeches at UN. Theory on Practice in Language Studies, 52, 343-349.
Thompson, Geoff 2004. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold Publications
Van Dijk, T.A. 1980. Macrostructure as Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction and Cognition. New Jersey:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Van Dijk, T.A 2000. Ideology and Discourse. London: Routledge
. Van Dijk, T.A. 2001. Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for Diversity R. Wodak
M. Michael, Ed. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis pp. 95-120. London: Sage
Van Dijk, T.A. 2008. Discourse and Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan Van Leeuwen, T.2008. Discourse and Practice: New tools for Critical Discourse
analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Wang, Junling. 2010. A Critical Dicourse Analysisof Barack Obama’s Speeches.
Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13, 254-261. Wodak, Ruth Ed.. 1989. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political
Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Wodak, R 2001. What is CDA about: a Summary of its History, Important
Concepts, and Its Developments. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis p 1-13. London: Sage
Wodak, R Meyer, M. Ed. 2009. Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology. London: Sage.
Wodak, R. 2007. Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis. Louis de Saussure and Peter K. Schulz, Ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yu Shi. 2005 Identity Construction of the Chinese Dispora. Ethnic Media Use, Community Formation, and the Possibility of Social Activism, 19 1.
