The Concept of Anti-Authoritarian Nationalism
“business competition, which is also a conflict of human interests and activities” or “still more like State policy, which again, on its part may be looked upon as a
kind of business competition on a great scale Clausewitsz.2001 The tax dollars cuts come up as the third issue. In Clinton’s term, the tax
cuts are meant to the high incomes but contrarily in Bush’s term, it is purposed for the middle-working class. The policy of the tax cuts enacted in 2001 when Bush
lead as the U.S president. To argue about the tax cuts, the economists were separated into two groups. The proponents state that the policy brings some
positive impacts such as increasing pace of the economy growth and providing employment. Another group states that the policy of tax burden the low and
middle income class while the wealthy people will be more prosperous. The economy growth though positive does not mean that it will solve the
employment problems. It is even potential to cause the income inequality. The condition surely is a burden for the middle-working class. Bush tax cuts have
shifted the burden from the rich to the middle-working class. One of the problem makers is about the corporate scandals. The corporations have escaped to pay
their fair share as the result of Bush tax cuts. The proponents’ confidence that the tax cuts will bring benefits for both the rich and the middle-working class is out of
expectation. Obviously, the tax cuts failed. It contributed to the budget deficit which practically reduces government ability to fund essential services for the
schools, health, infrastructures and even basic research. Absolutely, it is fall to produce the economy growth. Therefore, during more than decades American got
less income. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI