not exactly compatible with the curriculum. That is proven by the fact that there are some of speaking materials suggested in curriculum not include in this
textbook. 2 The order of presentation of the speaking materials in this textbook is not presented systematically and not compatible with the latest curriculum. In
terms of the feasibility of language, the language that used in this textbook is simple and understandable.
37
b. The Analysis of English Textbook “Path way to English” Used in the First
Grade of Senior High School Based on Curriculum 2013.
This research is conducted by Arif Prasojo in 2014. He was a student of English Education Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher’s Training. The
aim of the study is to find out whether or not materials of English Textbook entitled “Pathway to English” compatible with Curriculum 2013 and to describe
the feasibility of content, language, and presentation of the textbook. This research used descriptive qualitative approach by using document analysis. The
writer took all exercise of listening, speaking, reading, and writing as the unit of analysis. The findings of the study stated that 1 the English Textbook of
“Pathway to English” compatible with the curriculum 2013. 2 The materials provided in the textbook completely developed, as all the suggested English
language skills exercises of writing, speaking, reading and listening materials in the curriculum 2013 are implemented. 3 The feasibility of content and
presentation has mostly met the standard of an English textbook in delivering curriculum 2013.
38
c. An Analysis of the Speaking Materials in “English Alive 2” Textbook for
the Eleventh Grade of Senior High School
This research has been conducted by Febriyan Dwi Cahyono dan Rahayu Kuswardany, students of English Education, Language and Art Faculty, Surabaya
37
Mailani. “An Analysis on Speaking Materials Written on English in Focus: An English Textbook for First Year of Junior High School”, Skripsi of Undergraduate of Syarif Hidayatullah
State Islamic University Jakarta, Jakarta, 2011, unpublished.
38
Arif Prasojo. “
The Analysis of English Textbook “Path way to English” Used in the First Grade of Senior High School Based on Curriculum 2013. Skripsi of Undergraduate of Syarif
Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, Jakarta, 2014, unpublished.
State University. The objectives of the study are to describe the presentation of speaking materials in “English Alive 2”textbook for the eleventh graders of Senior
High School based on the criteria of a good textbook proposed by Savignon, to describe the relevancy and the sequence of the speaking materia
ls in “English Alive 2” to the standard competence in School-Based curriculum or KTSP. This
study was designed to use descriptive qualitative belonged to a documentary analysis. The researchers took all speaking materials on the textbook as the unit of
analysis. Based on the analysis, the researchers found that the presentation of the textbook was arranged to meet the criteria proposed
by Savignon. The researcher also found that the relevancy of the speaking material was quite in line to the Standard Competence in the current
curriculum.
39
The similarities of these studies are about the object of study, method and design of study. All of them used content of textbook as their unit of analysis and
used document analysis as design of study. However, they have differentiation in the purpose, procedure and technique of analysis. The research that is conducted
by Mailani is to find out suitability between the speaking materials and KTSP and to describe the feasibility of content, language, and presentation of the textbook,
while the aim of Arif Prasojo’s research are to see whether or not exercise of
English Tex tbook entitled “Pathway to English” compatible with Curriculum
2013 and to describe the feasibility of content, language, and presentation of the textbook.. Different with Febriyan and Rahayu, their research are to see whether
or not the speaking materials on the textbook compatible with criteria of a good textbook proposed by Savignon and also KTSP.
The writer also used document analysis as design of the study; however she has differentiation about unit of analysis with all of the researchers above.
Unit analysis of the writer was not only the speaking material but also the
39
Febriyan and Rahayu,
“
An Analysis of the Speaking Materials in “English Alive 2” Textbook for the Eleventh Grade of Senior High School “, Skripsi of Undergraduate of Surabaya
State University.
