Conceptual Framework LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

25 used to classify and analyze the data found in the conversation from the main character in the game. This research also finds out the types of speech acts based on the way they are delivered by using language. When the speaker clearly states their intention, the listener will easily understand the purpose. However, sometimes utterances mean differently from what the speaker is intended to say or the speaker indirectly say what he or she means. Thus, the listener needs to pay more attention on the utterances made by the speaker. This language phenomenon is called indirect speech act. The research employs Searle’s theory of indirect speech act. In analyzing indirect speech act, there are some felicity conditions which are violated and at the same time, there are true felicities that give the clue of the real illocutionary force. In order to analyze the discussed issue, an analytical construct is presented briefly in the chart as follows. 26 Figure 1. Analytical Construct Pragmatics Speech Acts Context Bully Video Game Deixis Cooperative Principles Politeness Inference and Reference A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts in Bully Chapters I and II Video Game Felicity Conditions Types of Speech Acts Speech Acts Based on the Way They Are Delivered Direct Speech Acts Searle’s Classification Austin’s Classification Indirect Speech Acts Locutionary Act Illocutionary Act Perlocutionary Act Representatives Commissives Directives Expressives Declarations 27

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD

The objectives of this research were to identify the type of speech acts based on Searle’s classification and to identify the way they were delivered, as reflected by the main character in Bully video game. In accordance with the objectives, an appropriate methodology is needed to achieve the goal of the research.

A. Type of the Research

This research employed a descriptive qualitative research. According to Vanderstoep and Johnston 2009:310, qualitative research is making a narrative or textual descriptions on the phenomena under study. In other words, qualitative research describes the phenomena found in the study without making a modification or manipulating the data. In addition, Bogdan and Biklen in Sugiyono 20012:13 state that qualitative research occurs in natural setting and it is descriptive. It produces descriptive data of people’s own written or spoken words and observable behavior. The descriptive qualitative was employed in describing the data or in interpreting the findings. This research describes the phenomena of speech acts which were found in the conversation from the main character in Bully video game. Quantitative method was also employed in this research to find out the percentage to support analysis of the data. Therefore, this research belonged to quantitative-qualitative research. 28

B. Source, Form and Context of the Data

According to Vanderstoep and Johnston 2009:48, data is a collection of variables from a research sample. Qualitative research is descriptive, therefore the data in qualitative research are in the form of words rather than number, Bogdan and Biklen in Sugiyono 2012:13. The source of the data was the Bully video game ’s script. The source of the data of this research were taken from the scenes which appeared in each mission through Chapters I and II of the game. Thus, in this research the data were in the form of lingual unit, such as words, phrases, clauses, or sentences which contained speech acts. Meanwhile, the context of the data was dialogue since the research ’s object was video game.

C. Instrument of the Research

This research employed a qualitative method. As Bogdan and Biklen state in Sugiyono 2012:13, qualitative research has the natural setting as the direct source of data and researcher is the key instrument. Furthermore, Sugiyono, 2012:222 says that in qualitative the researcher is human instrument. The instrument functions as the one who decides the focus of research, collects, analyzes, and interprets the data, and also makes conclusion of the finding. In addition, Heigham and Croker 2009:11 state that in qualitative research, the researcher is the primary research instrument. Moreover, Creswell 2007:38 states that the qualitative researchers collect the data themselves through examining document, observing behavior, and interviewing participants. They