Previous Studies Literature Review
23
She analyzed speech acts in
“
Date Night ” movie. The research objectives were to
find out the types of speech acts focusing on illocutionary act and also to analyze the conversational implicature.
The results of the study showed that there were two important points. First, there were four kinds of illocutionary acts performed in Date Night based on
Searle’s categorization. They were representatives, directives, commissives, and expressive. Second, there were two types of conversational implicatures found in
the main character’s speech. They were generalized conversational implicature in which the main character’s intention was explicitly uttered and particularized
conversational implicature in which the main character’s intention was implicitly uttered.
Another pragmatic analysis of speech acts was conducted by Rayi Denok Sunestri 2012 in her thesis entitled
“
A Pragmatic Analysis of Speech Acts of Hester Prynne in Roland Joffe’s The Scarlet Letter as Reflection of American
Society in 17th Century ”. Her research had two objectives. The first was to find
out the classification and functions of speech acts based on illocutionary act. The second was to identify the characteristic of American society in 17
th
century based on the theory of context by Holmes.
The results of the study showed that there were four types of speech acts used by Hester Prynne in the film. They were representatives, expressives,
directives, and commissives. The declaration was not performed since Hester had no authority. The highest frequency was representatives, while commanding got
the highest frequency as the sub types among others. Second, the characteristic of
24
American society in 17
th
century was reflected by Hester’s speech acts in the
society dominance of religion in society, since religion controls all things in the society including controlling how to communicate, how to dress, how to decide
one’s punishment, how to control the mourning times, and how religion control women’s lives in society.
Similar to previous research, the researcher also analyzes pragmatics in term of speech acts. This research tries to find out the types of speech acts based
on Searle’s classification and the way they are delivered. The differences between this research and the previous research are in the object of the research and the
objectives. These differences will lead to different discussion and findings.