The respondents gave their opinions, comments, and suggestions for the designed set of listening materials. The questionnaire for the respondents
contained of eighteen questions. The respondents gave their opinion by stating their agreement, disagreement and doubt by choosing one of the five points of
agreement on the fourteen first questions of the questionnaire. Indeed, the
respondents were asked to give their opinion, comment and suggestion on the designed materials for the four last questions. The result of the post design
questionnaire was used to evaluate and revise the designed material. The discussion on the description of the respondents and the data presentation are as
follows.
4.1.4.1 The Description of the Evaluation of the Materials Design Respondents
The description of the respondents of the preliminary filed testing is presented in Table 4. 4.
Table 4.4. The Description of the Respondents of the Preliminary Field Testing
Group of Participants No
Sex Educational Background
Teaching Experiences in years
M F
D3 S1
S2 S3
5 5-10
10 English Teacher in SMA
Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta
1 √
√ √
2 √
√ √
3 √
√ √
English Lecturer from Engish Study Program
Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta
4 √
√ √
5 √
√ √
Total 2
3 4
1 1
3 1
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4.1.4.2 Data Presentation and Analysis
The questionnaires were distributed to the respondents to gain the data about the evaluation of the designed materials. The respondents’ opinion were
classified into numbers that show their degree if agreement. The points of agreements are shown below.
1= strongly disagree with the statement 2= disagree with the statement
3= doubtful 4= agree with the statement
5= strongly agree with the statement The descriptive statistic resented the result of the writer’s calculation on
the data from the evaluation questionnaire using central tendency. The results were used to revise the designed materials. In the questionnaire, the respondents’
opinions were expressed in numbers which showed their degree of agreement as shown in Table 4.5. and the result of the respondents’ opinion is presented as
follows.
Table 4.5. The Result of the Design Materials Evaluation No
Respondents’ Opinion N
Central Tendency
Mean
1. The standard competencies
5 4.40
2. The standard competencies are well formulated
5 4.40
3. The indicators are well formulated.
5 4.20
4. The indicators are able to support the attainment
of basic competencies. 5
4.00 5.
The topics are well formulated. 5
4.20 6.
The listening materials are match with the competencies and indicators.
5 4.40
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
No Respondents’ Opinion
N Central
Tendency Mean
8. The materials are relevant to the topic.
5 4.60
9. The materials are able to develop the students’
listening skill. 5
4.00 10.
The tasks in each unit are sufficient for one meeting 2x30 minutes.
5 4.20
11. The tasks support competencies achievements.
5 4.60
12. The tasks in each topic are able to facilitate the
students to
comprehend the
topic being
discussed. 5
4.60
13. The instructions in each task are clear and easy
to be understood. 5
3.80 14.
Generally, the set of English instructional listening materials is well formulated.
5 4.20
The total mean of the designed materials was 4.2, it meant that the designed materials were good and acceptable for the eleventh grade students of SMA
Pangudi Luhur 1 Yogyakarta. However, the designed materials still needed
revisions based on the respondents’ evaluation comments, suggestion and feedback.
4.1.4.3 Comments on the Designed Set of Materials
