21
26 x
27 ny
This table displays the contrastive analysis of sound system between the students‟ native language Indonesian and their target language English. As
the  writer  discusses  previously  that  one  of  the  students‟  troublesome  in
producing English sound is because of some the English sounds does not exist in their native language, contrastively even the sounds that exist in their native
language, it is pronounced differently. Based  on  the  IPA  International  Phonetic  Association  and  the  other
resources for Indonesian‟ phonemic spelling, English has 20 vowels involving 12 single vowels consist of 7 short vowels and 5 long vowels and 8 diphthongs,
whilst  Indonesian  has  9  vowels  only;  it  classified  6  single  vowels  and  3 diphthongs. Moreover, consonants in English are 24 and 25 consonants exist in
Indonesia. In conclusion, the common problems in teaching learning pronunciation
are  because  the  different  sound  between  their  native  language  and  target language that make the students face the difficulty in transferring their mother
tongue into target language and the difficulty in practicing new sound appeared in their target language.
5. Preliminary Considerations in the Teaching of Pronunciation
Teaching  pronunciation  needs  some  considerations  that  support teaching-learning  activity  run  better,  for  example,  how  the  sounds  are
produced, how people create the words, what kind of sounds appear in English word or sentence, and what factors that courage the students to speak English.
Those may affect the students‟ improvement in practicing the pronunciation of their target language.
Avery and Erlich 2009 noticed some several factors to be considered in  the  teaching  pronunciation  in  the  EFL  classroom  that  may  influence  the
22
students ‟  encouraging  in  pronouncing  the  English  words  or  sentences,  there
are:
1.  Biological  factors
,  the  influence  of  the  students‟  mother  tongue  in acquiring native-like pronunciation in a second language.
2.  Socio-cultural  factors,  this  factor  are  strongly  influenced  the
students in different culture that also influence their achievement in transferring the sound native-like pronunciation in LT.
3.  Personality  factors;  the  students  who  are  out-going,  confident,  and
willing to take risks probably have the more opportunities to practice their  pronunciation  inside  and  outside  classroom.  These  factors
affect  the  acquisition  of  the  sound  system  of  a  foreign  and  second language.
42
Biological  factors  are  one  of  the  factors  that  influence  the  students „pronunciation improvement. These factors are related to their organ of speech
as  the  set  of  speech  productions.  As  the  writer  previously  presented  that  the wordssentences  as  a  collection  of  vowels  and  consonants  are  produced  by
organ of speech. In supporting this assumption, Avery and Erlich‟s statement,
biological factor is stated as the influence by the students‟ mother tongue.
43
As we  know  that  tongue  is  one  of  the  organs  of  speech  production.  Tongue
influences the student‟s acquiring in pronunciation because some of the sound system  in  English  does  not  exist  in  their  native  language,  so  they  seem  quite
confuse  how  to  pronounce  the  new  sounds  and  it  require  lots  of  practice  to make their tongue smoothly.
The  second  factor  is  socio-cultural.  This  factor  may  influence  the student‟s desire and motivation in exposing their target language, preliminary
in  practicing  their  English  out side of classroom. They  absolutely  don‟t  have
time enough if they just learn English inside classroom. But if there is no one help  student  to  practice  hisher  language,  it  seems  dilemma  for  student  even
though the students have highly-motivated.
44
The last factor recommended by Avery and Erlich is personality factor. This  factor  is  considered  as  the  main  factor  that  influences  people  effort  in
42
Peter Avery and Susan Ehrlich, Teaching American..., Second Edition, p.xv-xvi.
43
Peter Avery and Susan Ehrlich, Teaching American..., Second Edition, p.xv-xvi.
44
Peter Avery and Susan Ehrlich, Teaching American..., Second Edition, p.xv-xvi.
23
doing  everything,  even  less  in  le arning.  In  this  case,  student‟s  intern
motivation  and  attitude  is  highly  appreciated.  Student  is  assumed  who  has  a big desire, out-going, and confident could improve andor even expand hisher
English quickly. This student will practice and expose hisher target language into social-life, not only inside classroom.
45
In  this  case  the  writer  concludes,  the  considerations  in  the  teaching  of pronunciation  are  biological  factor  that  is  relating  to  the  students‟  way  in
pronouncing  word,  while  Socio- cultural  factor  affects  the  students‟  effort  in
developing  their  target  lang uage,  and  personality  factor  in  line  the  students‟
desire in expand practice their target language in the daily life.
B.  Minimal Pair Drills
Many  ways  could  be  done  by  the  language  learner  in  improving  their English  pronunciation.  One  of  the  ways  or  techniques  recommended  by  some
linguists is minimal pair drills. Michael Ashby and John Maidment 2008 argued, “In  order  to  prove  conclusively  that  a  phonetic  distinction  is  contrastive  in  a
particular  language  it  is  necessary  to  find  a  pair  of  words  in  the  language  that differ  in  only  one  segment.”
46
It  means  minimal  pair  is  one  of  the  appropriate techniques to prove that the single phonetic sound in a pair of words is contrasted.
In addition, acc ording to Avery and Erlich 2009, “minimal pair refers to pairs of
words  which  have  different  meanings  and  which  differ  in  pronunciation  on  the basis of one sound only.”
47
. In this case, minimal pair is viewed as a technique to distinguish  English  sound  in  the  words  that  have  quite  similar  sound  but  indeed
have been different meaning. Furthermore,  Bloomfield  1933  in  Marianne  Celce-Muria,  et.  Al  2009
defined, “minimal pair drill-drills that use words that differ by a single sound in the  same  position.  This  technique  based  on  the  concept  of  the  phoneme  as  a
minimally  distinctive  sound,  is  used  for  both  listening  practice  and  guided  oral
45
Peter Avery and Susan Ehrlich, Teaching American..., Second Edition, p.xv-xvi.
46
Michael Ashby and John Maidment, Introducing Phonetic …, p.136
47
Peter Avery and Susan Ehrlich, Teaching American..., Second Edition, p.207.
24
Production.”
48
Bloomfield  added  that  minimal  pair  is  appropriately  used  for listening practice and oral production.
Basically, those arguments  have the same aim which is  minimal  pair is  a technique that is used in teaching pronunciation to distinct the quite similar sound
that  have  the  same  position  in  a  word  or  sentence.  Students  sometimes don‟t
understand the difference of its sound and the effect of its differences. Eventhough this  seems  small  problem,  but  it  can  affect  the  understanding,  efficiency,  and
fluency in communication. So, this practice is regarded useful for both the speaker and the hearer.
There  are  two  kinds  of  sample  in  teaching  materials  of  minimal  pair,  it demonstrates in word drills and sentence drills.
49
Table 2.3 Sample Minimal Pair Teaching Materials
No. WORDS DRILLS
SENTENCE DRILLS A iy
B i Syntagmantic Drills
Paradigmatic Drills
1. 2.
3. 4.
5. Sheep
Green Least
Meet Deed
Ship Grin
List Mitt
Did
1.  Don‟t  sit  in  the seat.
2.  Did  you  at  least get the list?
1. a.Don‟t slip on the floor. b.Don‟t  sleep  on  the
floor.
2.  a. Is that a black sheep? b. Is that a black ship?
From the table, it can be seen that the sound differences in the words seem obvious, but  it may seem  strange and difficult to  a foreign learner who  does not
speak the target language. Minimal  pair can be demonstrated in  two drills: word drills  and sentence
drills.  In  the  word  drills,  teacher  drills  the  students  by  contrasting  two  different words  but  the  pronunciation  seems  similar,  but  actually  sound  of  the  words  is
different  in  one  sound.  Whilst,  in  the  sentence  drills,  there  are  two  kinds  of  the
48
Marianne Celce-Murcia, et. al. Teaching Pronunciation …, p.3
49
Marianne Celce-Murcia, et. al. Teaching Pronunciation …, p.3
25
materials that can be presented in teaching learning activity, they are syntagmatic drills  and  paradigmatic  drills.  Syntagmatic  drills  contrast  two  words  within  a
sentence,  while  paradigmatic  drills  contrast  two  words  across  two  sentences.
50
Minimal-pair  drills  helps  the  students  to  recognize  the  English  sounds  and contrast both the English sounds in their native language and their target language,
thus the sounds are able to be produced flexibility and smoothly. The advantage of minimal  pair  for  students  is  the  students  perceive  English  pronunciation
accurately and fluently. In sum up, minimal pair drill is one of the ways in teaching pronunciation
by drilling the words that have the quite similar sound in pair. This drill is to train the  students‟  tongue  being  smoothly  and  introduce  them  to  recognize  the
difference sound between the studen ts‟ native language and their target language.
Hopefully, they are familiar with English sound and practice its sound correctly.
50
Marianne Celce-Murcia, et. al. Teaching Pronunciation, … p.4