The Result of Post Interview

50 From that calculation, the mean score of the class in post-test 2 showed the valuably improvement, it is 91.41. To calculate the percentage of students‟ improvement of pronunciation test score between pre-test and post-test 2, the writer computes as follows: P= y2-y x 100 y P= 91.41-68.21 x 100 68.21 P= 23.2 x 100 68.21 P= 34.01 From that computation, it can be seen that the students‟ mean score of post-test 2 showed the higher improvement than the comparison of mean score in post-test 1, the percentage is 34.01.

D. The Interpretation of Test Result

The interpretation of the data results among pre-test, the pos-test of cycle 1 and the post-test of cycle 2 as follows: In the pre-test, the mean score of students on pronunciation test before using CAR and applying minimal pair drill in teaching pronunciation is 68.21. This mean score is viewed low because the minimal standard-mean score that the teacher declared is 70 seventy. So, mean score 68.21 is assumed as the low score achievement. Afterwards, to compare whether CAR succeed or not, it was done post-test that is carried out after implementing CAR for each cycle. The result of mean score in the post-test cycle 1 is 82.05. This is assumed as good achievement- mean score that the students got because they could pass the minimal standard score that the teacher declared. It can be said that the students‟ mean score from the pre-test to post-test improved. The improvement is 82.05-68.21 = 13.84 or the improvement percentage is 20.29. However, from this percentage, the CAR has 51 been failed. Because the criterion of the action success based on the writer and the teacher‟s agreement is 30. Furthermore, the mean score of post-test 2 is 91.41. It can be said that the students showed their best achievement. They proved the good improvement for each cycle. The percentage of mean score improvement between pre-test and post- test 2 is 34.01. From that percentage, it can be concluded that the CAR is success because the percentage of students‟ mean score of post-test 2 could pass the criterion of CAR success, 30. So, the writer and the teacher agreed that the cycle of CAR is stopped.

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving student's ability in writing reconunt text through picture sequences: a classroom action research at X grade MA Darul Ma'arif Cipete

0 3 121

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

Improving students' mastery of verb I (present tense) and verb II (past tense) forms by using transformation drill (a classroom action research in 7TH grade of SMPN 238 Jakarta)

0 21 147

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

Improving the seventh grade students reading skill by using collaborative learning: (A classroom action research at SMPIT darul muttaqien parung bogor)

0 6 122

Improving students' speaking ability by using role play: a classroom action research at VII Grade of SMPN 251 Jakarta - Timur

1 12 71

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION BY USING TRACKING AT THE THIRD GRADE OF SDN JETIS II SRAGEN: AN ACTION RESEARCH.

0 1 6

INTRODUCTION IMPROVING READING COMPREHENSION FOR THE FIRST GRADE STUDENTS AT MTs N 1 SURAKARTA BY USING FLASHCARD (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6

IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE IMPROVING STUDENTS SPEAKING ABILITY BY USING ROLE-PLAY (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH AT THE SIXTH GRADE OF SDN 01 KARANGTURI-LASEM).

0 3 15

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION BY USING MINIMAL PAIRS DRILL IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOO

0 0 11